Zero Origin Universe Update.



The Zero Origin Universe.

The basis of the concept is that the universe has evolved from
an origin of absolutely nothing. No matter or energy, no time or
dimension, evolving from absolute non existence. Every attempt
to comprehend the pre-universe always breaks down because there
is absolutely nothing to comprehend. However, trying to
comprehend infinity is no lesser challenge. But one thing that
is certain is that (what we assume would be) infinity and a point
of (what we assume to be) zero dimension are integral parts of
our universe. Those two parameters become relative as the
universe evolves.

The initial consequence of the zero origin is that the time
required to start the ball rolling from the stationary time rate
of non existence is an eternity. The universe, right from the
infinitesimally minute origin, has always been of infinite
proportions.

Stating that the initial disturbance was infinitesimally minute
doesn't really capture just how minute that would have been.
Absolutely nothing is far closer to the mark.

In order to create the very first signs of existence, there would
need to have been some disturbance which disrupted the "state"
of non existence. Non existence can be considered as a state
because it became relative to existence at the instant when time
began, even though the two states are always absolutely separated
in time. Whatever the cause of the initial disturbance it cannot
possibly be explained, but due to its infinitesimally minor
origin it is infinitely more logical than any theory that
requires some kind of eternally existing stuff of indeterminate
origin from which a universe can emerge. Such a theory exists on
some astral plane with nothing whatever supporting it.

Prior to the initial disturbance, before the beginning of time,
the state of non existence was _necessarily_ in absolute balance.
The initial disturbance must then have been drawn from that
absolute balance in equal amounts on "either side" of non
existence. The only possible "sides" are necessarily absolute
opposites, creating some kind of direction and dimension for them
to be relative in, with the non existent state as the focal
point. Direction as we perceive it cannot apply in that realm.
The two sides of the disturbance must simultaneously extend from
non existence in every possible direction in their opposing
dimensions, and being generated from non existence should be
geared to return there through some kind of elastic recoil
action. Only then can the disturbance return to non existence
when everything has again settled down. If a force can't be
absorbed elsewhere, it will elastically return from whence it
came.

Initially, there was only the one disturbance in the entire
universe. The fact that the universe has evolved to its current
state is proof enough that the initial disturbance was not
annulled, but has carried on to generate countless other
disturbances of the same nature.

Figure (1) of the image linked below represents the negative
dimension. The negative side of the disturbance is drawing into
a lesser dimension than the non existent state, which sets the
origin of dimension as infinity. Figure (2) is the positive
dimension, where the positive side of the disturbance is drawing
into a dimension which is greater than the origin of dimension,
being perceived as point sized. Negative and positive time rates
must also apply in the respective dimensions.

The direction arrows shown in the image indicate the initial
offset direction relative to non existence. The recoil direction
that would annul the disturbance is opposite.

http://members.optusnet.com.au/maxkeon/start.jpg

The origin of the positive dimension is a point, while the origin
of the negative dimension is infinity. If the two realms are
overlaid, as in diagram (3), time distances between the
dimensional origins appear to reduce any relationship between
the disturbances to zero. But that's not so at all. If the origin
of dimension for the positive dimension is a point, _so too is
the origin of the negative dimension as seen from the positive
dimension_. If the origin of the negative dimension is infinity,
_so too is the origin of the positive dimension from the
viewpoint in the negative dimension_. The non existent state is
exactly where it appears to be in each dimension. It can't be in
two places at the same time.

The relationship between the positive and negative disturbances
is therefore immediate in each realm, so they will not only be
drawn toward an annulment in the non existent state, but will
also be drawn through the window of non existence toward their
counterparts to what seems to be the direction of annulment
between each other, which is in fact the completely wrong
direction. The disturbance is maintained in existence by this
false attraction, forever.

Specifying zero size or infinite size for the focal point of
dimension in the state of non existent is illogical. The
dimensions which extend from that focal point are designating it
a zero and infinite size, but it obviously can't exist in _any_
kind of dimension.

The e- and e+ charges which are labeled electron and positron
are the two sides of the disturbance. They are each the origin
of their own dimension and are both point sized in the positive
dimension. Currently accepted theory is that when a pair of these
particles are drawn together they are converted to E/M energy and
completely removed from existence, which falsifies this theory
if true. But the fact that they can both be resurrected out of
nowhere by an E/M packet carrying the same or greater energy than
the combined pair is fairly conclusive evidence that it's not
true at all. How can E/M radiation possibly know how to make an
electron or positron? How does it determine how much charge goes
into each before the creation process turns off, leaving any
excess radiation to carry on as normal? How can it possible carry
that kind of information?

Electrons and positrons fill the roles with a precision that is
far too precise to be coincidence. But I can't attach the label
of electron or positron to the disturbances because I have no
idea which is which.

Because the positive side of the disturbance in one pair is
constantly advancing into the negative dimension in pursuit of
it's counterpart, while still remaining the origin of the past
dimension it's creating, it's leaving the past behind at the
speed at which it's advancing, and nothing else will ever enter
the past dimension because the same laws will also apply for
everything else that exists as well. Everything will be drawing
away from everything else at the rate of advance, or the speed
of light at the time.

But the negative side of the disturbance is also drawing from
non existence at the same rate, but into the positive dimension,
which is in the opposite direction to the positive side of the
disturbance. The focal point of the charge force relationship,
being the non existent state, is simultaneously carried in two
opposing directions. The positive and negative dimensions are
necessarily still retreating from that relationship at the speed
of light, but the focal point in the relationship is now
generally fixed relative to anything else that could likewise
exists.

The origins of the two dimensions are seen as the absolute
minimum size from the viewpoint in the positive dimension and as
the absolute maximum size from the negative dimension. The false
directions of attraction are inward beyond a point and outward
beyond the absolute maximum size respectively. But from each
side, the view through the window of non existence to the other
side would be reversed. It's clearly not going to be unaffected.
The inward attraction direction in the positive dimension is
reversed to point outward when it enters the negative realm, and
vice versa from the negative viewpoint. To put it another way,
from the viewpoint in the positive dimension the past in the two
dimensions both extend outward as one dimension, and from the
viewpoint in the negative dimension the past in the two
dimensions both extend inward as one dimension.

The orientation of the universe is primarily set around the
initial disturbance and any consequent disturbance would be
generated from that. The distance relationship between every new
arrival and the rest initially remains fixed. The electromagnetic
image from each is left behind in the _stationary_ past to travel
the universe at what would have been an almost non existent speed
of light relative to now.

Light is always in motion relative to matter, or matter is always
in motion relative to light. The latter is the truth.

It may all seem rather bizarre, but the laws generated from
within dimension can't be applied for the creation of dimension.
There were no preset laws. They were whatever and wherever they
needed to be. The current mode of interaction in the immediate
charge force relationship is recorded where they once resided,
being left in the dimension that they leave behind as they, as
the origins of dimension, move onward into the realms of each
other. The global interaction between two attracting forces is
clearly apparent in the dimension that they create. If the entire
2D stretch of dimension perpendicular to any direct line from
the source is taken back to its origin, the true global nature
of the interaction at the source becomes obvious.

There were no rules in place regulating what the initial
disturbance would be. It could have been _anything_ at all. If
it consisted of three interacting components which were somehow
the complete opposites of each other the universe would be
completely different. For starters, the surface area of a sphere
would be pi times diameter cubed.

The true initial charge force relationship would have been
immediate, with nothing extending beyond that relationship that
could electromagnetically interact with anything outside the
relationship. But there would be a distortion in the surrounding
dimension indicating its presence, and it would be drawn toward
other such newly created relationships through this space
distortion. The charge force relationships, being immediate from
a viewpoint in either dimension, can collect together in the same
place and interact immediately with each other. The components
are now free to move about within multiple relationships, and
even exist in isolation from a counterpart somewhere that must
also exist in isolation.

But the most likely scenario is that the proton with its resident
electron would be first to form.

------

As the universe evolves, everything that exists is being slowly
but surely drawn into a deepening void of dimension, where both
the speed of light and time increase. Time as measured by life
cycles, clocks or anything else that involves the motion of
matter, slows down.

The evolving universe is perhaps progressing toward singularities
everywhere. Within each singularity, everything that exists (in
the matter world) would be housed within an instantaneously
infinite dimension. So there is room for infinite numbers of
singularities to develop within the immediately infinite space,
everywhere, and they will all be absolutely removed from each
other. But it doesn't ever end. An eternity of time will pass by
once more during another instant at a lesser evolved state.

The expanding distances between developing singularities could
perhaps slow the development of each singularity, but new matter
would be more likely to be dragged up into existence in a more
violently interacting environment. In this case, from a viewpoint
in a fixed time zone, a "near" singularity will overtoggle into
almost instantaneous development as it nears its ultimate goal.

Whatever the case, the development direction is certain.
Everything that exists is on a one way journey into an ever
deepening turmoil, for eternity. And there is no way out. The
zero origin universe is truly the universe from hell.

To be continued.

-----

Max Keon

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: randomness
    ... If I instantiate a concrete instance mimicing you line by line I might ... To specify dimension isn't random. ... If a feedback mechanism is inherently operational ... How do you build partial existence? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe?
    ... It's no less a task than comprehending infinity. ... In a universe where time stands still, dimension does not exist. ... Infinite dimension is incomprehendable, but its existence is beyond ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe?
    ... It's no less a task than comprehending infinity. ... In a universe where time stands still, dimension does not exist. ... Infinite dimension is incomprehendable, but its existence is beyond ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Simple question (Yes or No) Is there a Pre-Bang Universe?
    ... It's no less a task than comprehending infinity. ... In a universe where time stands still, dimension does not exist. ... Infinite dimension is incomprehendable, but its existence is beyond ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: Getting out of this world?
    ... dimension one's body has no extension into. ... It's trying to put the destination into a theory, ... Why do you assume the other universe is lacking something ... Wormholes don't sound like something someone could build here. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.science)