Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
- From: Uncle Al <UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 12:35:46 -0700
cjcountess wrote:
Hello this is Conrad Countess.
Bull*** meters are aquiver.
I first published this idea of c^2 as a
frequency at the high end of the electromagnetic spectrum where energy
turns to matter back in May of 2005 on sci physics and got some
interesting responses.
Here are a couple more,
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/analysis.jpg
< I explained it as the speed of light in linear
direction times the speed of light in frequency or right angular[snip rest of crap]
direction, resulting in the speed of light in circular motion due to a
balance of centrifugal and centripetal forces as one of the
explanations .
http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf
Dunning-Kruger effect (2000 Ig Nobel Prize): ignorance more
frequently begets confidence than does knowledge
1) Incompetent individuals tend to overestimate their own level of
skill.
2) Incompetent individuals fail to recognize genuine skill in
others.
3) Incompetent individuals fail to recognize the extremity of their
inadequacy.
http://www.meninhats.com/d/20040430.html
Idiot.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Formula for Decelerating Light
- Next by Date: Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
- Previous by thread: Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
- Next by thread: Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
- Index(es):