Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2

On May 9, 2:56 pm, cjcountess <cjcount...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello this is Conrad

Thank you John that was very interesting, and the relation to the
periodic table really set it off. I am going to study your ideas more
as I am sure I can learn something from them and I have some more of
my own that you might be interested in also including one concerning
periodic table.
Hello Uncle Al and Androcles. Didn't take either of you long to
descend.

If Al and Androcles are dissin' you, you're somebody.

Every separate thing is moving energy, and the energy, far
from being random, must move in a constant way
when unperturbed by other bits of moving energy.

Light is a frequency moving at c with a
certain attitude wrt that direction. Now we
transpose that movement at c to an orthogonal
frequency. We now have a wave travelling in a circle.
A standing wave.

In mine I find that second frequency to be
twice the first.

John
Galaxy Model
.

Loading