Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
- From: srp2inc@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 07:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
On 10 mai, 17:31, srp2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 10 mai, 12:33, cjcountess <cjcount...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
It may be more palatable for some if I said that c^2 is associated
with a frequency where the angular momentum of the wave equals and
balances the linear momentum. for a balance of centrifugal and
centripetal forces that create circular or spherical motion and rest
mass. After all if E=hf/c^2 measures energy of EM waves than at some
point at high end of EM spectrum, E must = hf = c^2 exactly where a
waves attains rest mass.
You are not far from the truth here even if your formulation is
incomplete,
and this is why I said you have potential, but your equation should
write
E=hf=mc^2
I have explored this in the past and found that this direct equality
can be true only for the energy making up the rest mass of the
electron (or positron), which is 8.18710414E-14 Joules
(or .511 MeV)
André Michaud
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
- From: srp2inc
- Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
- References:
- Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
- From: Androcles
- Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
- From: cjcountess
- Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
- From: john
- Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
- From: cjcountess
- Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
- From: srp2inc
- Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
- Prev by Date: Re: illustration about the em-field
- Next by Date: Relativity Drive as a Slow Wave Force Device- Fails!
- Previous by thread: Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
- Next by thread: Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading