Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
 From: Sam Wormley <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx>
 Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 03:07:01 GMT
Michael Helland wrote:
On May 13, 5:14 pm, jjs...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:On May 13, 6:07 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
Really? So do you understand what a relativistic doppler shift is? OrNo actually hubble redshift isn't, if you actually understood anyI understand that.
cosmology you understand that....
how about the Friedmann Equations? Do even know what they are? Or what
about a harmonic oscillator, or the maxwell equations? Understand any
of that? If no then you don't know jack shit about what the hell your
talking about....
At the very least, I understand Hubble redshift needs expansion, or an
explanation that yields the same results.
I understand that if redshift meant recessional velocity, that wouldBecause you think your incredible ignorance has gained you access to
place us at the center of something, which can't be right, (Copernican
principle) and that if every point were receding from every point,
like expansion we have something that makes more sense.
I understand that, and that expansion/big bang cosmology is what most
people accept as a fact.
But I don't.
some information to which only ignorant people like you are privy that
all the rest of us who are really scientists have nothing to
contribute since you know best.
Maybe.
Or maybe I just don't accept it.
If light signals decelerated in steady space along the same curve asExcept for the minor point of that isn't observed anywhere...
expansion, it would appear that every point were receding from every
point but that is merely an optical illusion.
If light slowed down in steady space; it would appear as if space was
expanding.
That is observed everywhere.
You like to fool yourself... Expanding space has consequences that
account for the abundances of hydrogen and helium, trace elements
like lithium and the CMB.
No Center
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html
Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html
WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html
WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
.
I've made 3 predictions that can be tested within 5 to 10 years,Well don't hold your breath mike I wouldn't want you to die before you
depending on when the next super telescope comes out.
We'll see.
see how dumb your idea is...
Oh and just out of curiosity do you know what this is?
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SphericalHarmonicDifferentialEquation.html
Do you know how to solve it?
Nope.
 References:
 Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
 From: Michael Helland
 Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
 From: Eric Gisse
 Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
 From: Michael Helland
 Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
 From: The Ghost In The Machine
 Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
 From: Michael Helland
 Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
 From: Eric Gisse
 Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
 From: Michael Helland
 Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
 From: jjsajd
 Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
 From: Michael Helland
 Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
 From: jjsajd
 Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
 From: Michael Helland
 Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
 Prev by Date: Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
 Next by Date: Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
 Previous by thread: Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
 Next by thread: Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
 Index(es):
Relevant Pages
