Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein <noeinstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 08:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 21, 9:37 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
SUPER DELEGATES CAN BRING AMERICA DOWN OR SAVE IT.
At every level of our social, economic, and political existence FAIR
PLAY has become the virtue least in evidence. Too often the rule-of-
thumb is: “Do bad things unto others, before they can do bad things
unto you.” Such philosophy reigns supreme in the USA because: People
see others “getting ahead” by doing bad, often immoral, and sometimes
criminal things. By those examples, people figure they, too, have a
“right” to get ahead in those ways. Would-have-been ‘good people’,
are good whenever such virtue advances their purposes, and they are
bad whenever such vices will “benefit” them. By degrees, the majority
of Americans are… two faced.
The above moral decline in America can be reversed only by having
people come to realize that most people will BENEFIT simply by having
the great majority play fair! If there is a ‘trickle down’ effect
that benefits everyone, it is having people care about the effects of
their actions on their neighbors—far and wide. If businesses ‘seem’
to have prices that are too high, some feel such prices justify their
shoplifting. But across America, shoplifting is a… ‘cost of doing
business’ that adds 15% to the cost of the products being sold. So,
part of the cause of the high prices—that some feel justifies their
shoplifting—is shoplifting itself!
When an American company can’t be price-competitive without out-
sourcing work to other countries, part of the reason for that is: the
cost of labor, here, is simply too high. And the other costs of doing
business, are becoming too great. Ask any company executive, and you
will hear that the cost of providing health care benefits to employees
has gone-through-the-roof. And you will hear that the cost of
litigation due to product liability suits has gone-through-the-roof.
As a ‘defense’, businesses employ expensive lawyers to side-step those
lawsuits. And lawyers will do so by lobbying for laws favorable to
businesses—at the expense of those who have been harmed.
Folks, America is in DIRE STRAITS, because our businesses and our
disparate groups aren’t fighting fair. Too few of us get the Big
Picture! But if most could get the Big Picture—and act wisely based
on that knowledge—the majority of the socio-economic problems that
adversely affect every one of us would begin to SHRINK, and to the
benefit of everyone!
At this moment, the single greatest threat to the survival of the USA,
and perhaps to the survival of the entire human race is… BARACK
OBAMA… His is a campaign that is rooted in UNFAIR PLAY. The USA is
despised in many parts of the world because our capitalist philosophy
seems to be: ‘win at all costs, and to-hell with how anyone else in
the world feels about it.’ And we are despised by many Muslims, in
particular, because we support Israel. Though the Jews have suffered
humongous and inhuman tortures and death, those acts should NEVER be
allowed to become a carte blanche for Jews to act for their own
selfish benefit without considering the consequences of their acts on
others. The Jewish controlled media in this country is backing Obama,
a minority candidate. Is that “an endorsement” that should sit well
with the American people?
Individually, Jews are some very fine people. I’ve had Jews for
friends and associates. But as a race, Jews use nepotism, back room
power plays, and immorality whenever those things will benefit their
race. And they think that they have a right to act unfairly, because
they are… “the chosen people”. That ‘Manchurian Candidate’, Barack
Obama, and Jews—as a race—are the two greatest threats to the survival
of the human race. So, can everyone see why I am so passionately
against having Obama become President?
Hillary Clinton continues to show her MOMENTUM in the Democratic race
for President by winning most of the primaries in the last few
months. Yet Obama keeps using his blatant, anti-democracy tactics to…
hang on. In a neck-and-neck horse race the winner is sometimes
decided in a photo finish. But even a ’winner’, so decided, isn’t
valid until the race has been reviewed to see if there are any late
infractions by the winning jockey that might disqualify such.
The closest semblance of a “democracy” via the present, sequential-
primary, debacle would be to have the super delegates vote—at the
convention—to break the Clinton-Obama tie. But Screaming Howard Dean
started pushing to get super delegates to decide ‘early’… for the
“benefit” of the party. But what that’s actually doing is encouraging
those super delegates to endorse a candidate. As I have explained
time and again in this post, the majority of the supporters of Obama
do so because he shows the testosterone of a fighter. In their naïve
minds they believe that by having a fighting President, they will
finally get their personal grievances addressed.
Every two years since this country was founded, the voters have been
sending… ‘fighters’ to Congress, and to the Executive Branch. But the
USA keeps getting worse and worse off. Now, 82% of Americans are
unsatisfied with the direction this country is headed. Ask
yourselves: Is it probable that a mean-spirited, egotistical jerk like
Barack Obama can convince Congress to suddenly correct deficiencies
that those very same congressman brought into existence by their own
votes?
After four years as President, Obama would be lucky to have gotten a
health care plan enacted. And such plan would probably be a far-cry
from the one that Obama now thinks he’s figured out better than anyone
else. As a rule: The success of a politician is in INVERSE proportion
to the size of his… ego. So, those voting for him can only “rejoice”
at having ram-rodded-in the “winner”. But is doing so, worth
DESTROYING the last chance America could ever have to correct its
ills?
Most of the super delegates are ‘party insiders’. Maybe those have
better judgment than the common delegates. However, the latter seems
highly unlikely. As Obama argues to get super delegates to his side,
those who yield show themselves to be shallow-minded, team-against-
team thinkers rather than: Choose the candidate who’s BEST for America
thinkers.
If and when my New Constitution gets ratified by the people, in a one-
day national referendum, most of those super delegates will be put out
of their “career” governmental jobs. But our selfish, elected
officials, and most of the super delegates, would rather have the
FAILED party system continue controlling this country, than to correct
the flawed Constitution that has allowed the yearly decline in trust
of the People for our governments.
Clinton has a huge case to cry: “FOUL!”, that is… unless she’s
selected to be the party’s nominee. That’s because the principles of
democracy on which this country was founded have been raped by the
parties; and to her personal detriment. Of course, she ‘could’ sue.
But most courts are corrupt places. Only by ratifying my New
Constitution will the Judiciary be put in its rightful place: I’ve
made the Judiciary a “lesser” branch of government!
Presently, one group of citizens controls one whole branch of
government, and effectively controls the other two branches. [Hint:
That group begins with the letter “a…”, and often adds an egotistical
“E…” after their names.] My New Constitution will put those “a…s” in
their proper place—or it will imprison those who don’t fall into
line. If the supporters of Obama are doing so for want of “change”,
the best way to GET change would be to vote for Hillary Rodham
Clinton!
I will not “air” my labor-of-love New Constitution to any person not
valuing democracy in America. If you out there will just value
DEMOCRACY as the most important issue for you, the economy will
improve; the wars will end (or at least I pray, so); and the bad image
of America in the world can start to improve. Unless the latter
happens, the USA could find itself on the receiving end of terrorism
that might well foment nuclear annihilation. So… is “the economy” an
issue more important than the lives and security of your own children
and… theirs?
There are a lot of “Cooter” Jones out there who can’t think beyond the
hoods of their orange hot rods. It’s amazing to me that CNN keeps
digging up these low mentalities to BARK for that dog Obama. In the
past I’ve been a blue (or yellow) dog democrat. But Obama is one anti-
America TRAITORIST whom I will never support! The corrupt national
media, in all of its branches, supposes that it will be Clinton’s duty
to ‘unite’ the democratic party. But by a two to one margin, her
supporters would rather abandon the party than to support Obama!
Never before in the history of this nation has she faced such a dire
crisis. While the starch-for-a-smile, and headlights-for-teeth Jamal
Simmons types keep SELLING Obama to the detriment of the human race,
there is this lone voice of hope bent on saving mankind and bringing
peace and prosperity to the world. My disproofs of Einstein’s
theories would, if our corrupt institutions of higher learning would
allow it, usher in a technological REVOLUTION that would create new
jobs and improve the lives of the citizens of the entire world! But
the cancer of national corruption is in every area of our existence:
social, business, educational, and governmental.
The time has come to ’Pay It Forward’—like in that made for TV movie.
If enough people will realize how showing our better sides can have a
snow-balling effect toward improving our national and world condition,
then hope will again rise in America. The present Democratic race
isn’t some game... It is a life or death struggle for the SURVIVAL of
the human race!
Please vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton for President of the United
States of America!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
On Apr 15, 10:25 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Heretofore, we humans have tried to find security by siding with a
strong group with a strong leader or leaders. Often this had been for
the protection of our own physical well-being, not just to gain some
vague economic or sociological advantage. In the last two centuries
Blacks have rallied together for their common cause of reducing
discrimination against their numbers. Though they have been hugely
successful, there are areas in which discrimination still exists. So,
any ‘ideal’ America must address the concerns of Blacks—fairly and
equitably.
There has never been a Black President of the USA. Jesse Jackson,
Colin Powell, Al Sharpton, and now Barack Obama are smart Black men
who have each been considered for this country’s highest office. A
recent poll showed that 76% of voters would be willing to consider a
Black candidate for President. Since Obama is the Black candidate of
the moment, his spinners quickly implied that 76% of the voters want
‘him’. But his viability as a candidate is being brought into
question because of the recent negative press over Reverend Jeremiah
Wright’s “damn the USA” sermon, and due to Obama’s candid remarks
showing his frustration in trying to appeal to those who have fallen
on hard times in the “small towns” of Pennsylvania, and across
America.
In recent weeks I’ve explained how the apparent unity of the Black
community behind Obama is, actually, an ominous sign for America. How
could that be? Obviously, there would be racial pride among Blacks in
finally having a Black elected President. But is that “pride” a
sufficient justification for electing Obama?
A prudent observer would expect that a candidate’s support would vary
up and down as new revelations about his or her qualifications are
aired. When negative aspects concerning Obama surfaced before the
Texas and Ohio primaries, Obama’s support among Blacks ‘should’ have
varied,too. But his 90 plus percent of the Black vote stayed
steady… And THAT fact is what is most ominous—because it shows that a
huge voting block is biased, beyond reason, to support a candidate who
isn’t qualified either by experience, or because of his character or
lack of same, to be President.
“The orator”, Obama, comes across as an angry fighter for his causes.
He appeals to those who are angry enough to fight… or who will rally
around someone who will do so for them. Electing people to “fight for
us” in Washington is what has been going on in this country since it
was established. After a typical election, about 50% of the voters
are losers, and they don’t like it. Nor does the losing party “like
it”. So, whatever good sounding rhetoric that got a politician
elected, usually gets squelched in the constant “fights” in our
perennial, ineffectual congresses. So, an Obama Presidency would be a
loose/loose situation for America.
In our time of discontent, the USA has an untapped UNITY that holds
perhaps the only promise of salvation for this country! To wit: 81%
of adults are “unhappy with the direction this country is headed”.
And such number of citizens—if united for the common objective of
correcting the problems—can FORCE the needed changes! Only by being
“united in our discontent” can the American people MEET the
constitutional requirements to change things! And there isn’t
anything that Congress or the Courts can do to stop it!
Presently, Barack Obama’s continued candidacy for President is the
main obstacle to correcting those solvable problems! Fortoolong our
political parties—unsanctioned by the Constitution—have royally
screwed up America! They have done so, primarily, by inserting…
political party sanctions into our could have been democracy-
approximating form of government. Without fair representation of each
individual citizen, regardless of race, sex, color or creed, this
country is on a path to failure. We “discontented citizens of the
USA” must NOT let that happen!
CNN’s John King points out that Obama’s best chance to win in
Pennsylvania is by his getting a high percentage of… the Black vote in
Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. But if those Blacks are united behind
Obama because of his “color” alone, then racial issues have DIVIDED
America much more than they ever were before Obama came on the scene!
If Blacks are rallying behind Obama, because he seems… mad and wants
to fight, they are KILLING any chance they might have had to correct
the remaining discrimination against their numbers. Blacks must NOT
be one-dimensional, color-is-all-that-matters, people! As strong a
voting block as their numbers are, there aren’t enough Blacks to
counter the likely WHITE discontent that will surface if there is any
color based, reverse discrimination in this country. So, there is no
way that Obama can help to end the discrimination against Blacks.
Daily, thousands of Blacks who have felt so disenfranchised that they
have never registered to vote, are being hustled to support Obama.
But voting is a PRIVATE privilege, NOT a predestined duty for one
candidate! Obama is violating principles of democracy by inserting
his organization into the voter registration process in any way
whatsoever.
The best and perhaps only way for Blacks to get fair treatment is for
them to UNITE to change our governmental processes to be more closely
a democracy. But this read-between-the-lines process to change won’t
happen if Blacks cause this country to become more polarized along
racial lines by continuing to support Barack Obama! The most positive
outcome in Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Indiana is to have a
DECREASING percentage of BLACKS voting for that man! Then, and only
then, will Blacks show that they haven’t been BOUGHT by anyone!
If Blacks want their just and equitable share of power, they can have
it by voting for Hillary Rodham Clinton for President of the United
States of America. If they will do so, ALL Americans will be the
beneficiaries!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
On Apr 11, 5:15 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is that 'bad day' every year when Americans are reminded how
costly "what government does" can be. Those being pressed by home
mortgages without fixed interest rates; or depressed home values--
because of the exodus of the unemployed--especially, have reasons to
feel unhappy.
It has been said: "Misery likes company." A recent poll shows that
81% of American adults are unhappy with the present direction our
country is headed. Should that datum be a cause for us to feel
depression, or to feel hope? Actually, it is one of the most positive
things to ever happen to this country! You ask: How could that be?
"Well..."--as President Reagan liked to begin salient comments by saying--
when Americans are united for a good cause, there is no force on Earth
that can lessen their resolve!
Horrific WW II happens to have been: "The greatest concerted effort in
the history of mankind!" Americans were rightly incensed when our
international friends and allies were invaded. And such was being
perpetrated by a proud, but economically depressed, German people.
Adolph Hitler happens to have been the wrong "artist", at the right
time, with the wrong solution. Even so, he managed to foment the
German masses, because of his exceptional oratory ability.
Barack Obama is acknowledged to have exceptional oratory ability.
Most shy Americans trembled-through their deliveries of oral book
reports in school. So, they consider a speaker... masterful, if he or
she can get through a speech without showing stage fright. Obama has
never shown the emotion of freight--nor any other normal emotion--in his
tone of delivery, or in the expressiveness of his voice. That seems
strange; very strange.
Graphology has been my serious hobby since before I was a teen. I've
been a keen observer of the diverse personalities of those I see
writing. And because I, also, have a knowledge of people in general,
I have a basis for making generalities.
Barack Obama had an unhappy childhood. And he's using such fact to
try to counter his just-now-being-recognized elitism. He claims that
he can identity with the discontented voters to whom he appeals. And
he says he can do so because he was once poor, himself. The Clintons'
tax documents show the obvious fruits of their successes--not their
failures. I ask you: Who is better qualified to lead this country
toward success: A person who likes to brag that he hasn't always been
successful; or the person who has for most of their life been
successful?
The most recent icon of the Democratic Party was certainly JFK. His
family was very rich, yet he was a Democrat--concerned with the lives
of those who are disadvantaged. Many of the richest people in the
world used their wealth to build universities, hospitals, research
centers, or to make grants beneficial to those less fortunate.
America must never stymie an individual's opportunity for economic
attainment, that is... if such attainment has been fairly and honorably
achieved.
Both Clinton and Obama are pressing the objective of improving the lot
of those in the middle class. Every four years, "the rich" in this
country are targeted as beingtoofavored in the tax laws. Since
there are more people of average income, than there are in the high
ranges, it makes good political sense to appeal to: Where the most
voters are. But is such a class-against-class battle what is best for
the future of America? No way!
If and when our systems of government can become like well-oiled
machines, there are optimum objectives that should improve everyone's
opportunities, fairly. Socialism
...
read more »- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- Prev by Date: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
- Next by Date: Re: Riccati and its applications
- Previous by thread: Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- Next by thread: Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
