Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious



On May 15, 4:38 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 15, 1:31 pm, jjs...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:


<snip, trash>


Well, according to Sean Carroll, it's not conserved.

So if deceleration is in hot water for not conserving energy, so is
expansion:

"Actually, there is a field of physics in which energy is not
conserved: it's called general relativity. In an expanding universe,
as we have known for many decades, the total energy is not conserved.
Nothing fancy to do with dark energy -- the same thing is true for
ordinary radiation. Every photon loses energy by redshifting as the
universe expands, while the total number of photons remains conserved,
so the total energy decreases. An effect which has, of course, been
observed. "

http://preposterousuniverse.blogspot.com/2004/05/doubt-and-dissent-ar....

This is of course complete trash since conservation of energy is
supported by both SR and GR.

This does not save you Mike since he never states photons lose energy
nor does he make the argument. Even if he did its an unpublished blog
post so who gives a ***...

"Sean Carroll is a Senior Research Associate in the Department of
Physics at the California Institute of Technology. His research
interests include theoretical aspects of cosmology, field theory, and
gravitation. He is the author of a graduate-level textbook, Spacetime
and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity. And if you’re not
(yet) in grad school, you should buy his Teaching Company lectures on
dark matter and dark energy. His first blogging experience was at
Preposterous Universe."

http://cosmicvariance.com/sean/

Still trash, its a blog not a published paper... it makes comments on
another's work and does not have any scientific relevance... just
because he is a scientist doesn't make him right, take Wolfram... he
made a crackpot idea for the history books its called NKS...

<snip, trash>

Mike do you actually have an argument to make that is sensible or are
you determined to be the biggest idiot you can be. You have not made a
theory here, nor have you presented scientific evidence, sorry. A Blog
post is not a scientific support for anything. You don't understand
the math or the theory behind any of this so what the hell are you
doing here...?

Your a diversity hire mike.... go away until you grow an infantile
intellect...

Cheers
.


Quantcast