Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious

On May 16, 7:53 am, jjs...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On May 16, 1:40 am, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>

Common sense.

Mike your to ignorant to have any...

EM holds atoms together.

Hmmm.... and what about strong nuclear force? the one that happens to
hold the nucleus together?


Good point.

That one has a very short range.

Because the Universe has better things to do than hold nuclei together
over long distances.

Just like it has better things to do than manage electron interactions
at distances of trillions of light years.


If the Universe is infinitely large, it probably has better things to
do than manage the EM interactions between atoms trillions of light
years apart.

That is pitiful Mike even for you....


It's true for the strong nuclear force.

Why not the em force?

Because light always travels at c, and Jesus loves you.



Therefore, the EM field actually has a finite range, and as it dies
out redshifted galaxies, quasars, then the CMB appears before it all
goes black.

Did you read anything about gravitational redshift, do even understand
the basics of conservation of energy, or relativistic observation?


If c is not a Universal constant, but the default velocity of each
individual photon, and that velocity drops in conjunction with it's
frequency (Hubble redshift) then the properties of space-time are
going to be different for that photon.

Seems to me the conservations laws would alter similarly as a
consequence.

In other words, the conservation laws change where redshift is
observed.


And since you seem to be in the mood to dodge questions let me restate
them for you:

Why do photons decelerate?

Because they have a finite range.


What form is the energy loss?

Deceleration.


Is the energy lost or converted?

Lost.


How do you maintain the conservation of mass and energy, that are both
held by GR, SR?


The first law of thermodynamics says:

"The increase in the internal energy of a system is equal to the
amount of energy added by heating the system, minus the amount lost as
a result of the work done by the system on its surroundings."

In a deceleration model (just as in expansion) there is no increase in
the internal energy of a system, nor any work being done.

It simply loses energy through observed redshift, caused either by
expansion or deceleration.
.

Quantcast