Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein <noeinstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 08:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
On May 15, 1:45 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OBAMA TAKES THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FOR GRANTED
While the beleaguered Democratic race for the presidential nomination
goes on, Barack Obama has rolled-down his trademark, Screaming Howard
Dean, ‘rolled-up sleeves’. The latter sleeve positions were one of
the ways that Obama mimicked, and MOCKED, the hard-working men and
women of America. Obama has had substantially more success at
attracting people who are naïve, near-sighted, or blind; i.e., those
who favor continuing our failed party-against-party, group-against-
group, and class-against-class contests. But the latter, perennially
ineffectual, contests have been negating the democratic,
representative form of government we deserve, and which we so
desperately need, again.
Instead of rolled-up sleeves, recently, Obama has been wearing the
more conventional, coat and tie attire of a President of the USA. He
hopes that by “looking” presidential, he can steam-roll the remaining
undecideds in Kentucky, Oregon, and Puerto Rico. But mainly he
expects that enough weak-minded super delegates will get on his Pied
Piper Bandwagon to give him… the fateful “numbers” that he needs.
Those RATS will follow him out of town. But it would be best for
America if they would follow him out of this country!
CNN’s Wolf Blitzer interviewed Hillary Clinton, recently. When
Blitzer asked Hillary about her daughter, Chelsea, Hillary started to
cry. Those were most telling tears. They were tears that should TUG
at the heart of America! And they were tears that should separate the
GENUINE candidate from the phony. Blitzer’s implied question wasn’t
so much about: “Don’t you have a wonderful daughter.” It was about
having a wonderful daughter who is putting her HEART and SOUL into
having her mother be elected President of the United States of
America. And it is about having Chelsea’s noble efforts be wasted… in
a fundamentally flawed political race.
In part, I’m working to have Clinton be elected President, because I
won’t allow some phony, egotistical jerk like Barack Obama to be
disrespectful to a genuine-hearted woman like Hillary Clinton. He has
been disrespectful to her in the debates, and ever since he made his
first “acceptance speech” after the IOWA caucuses. And he has been
doing that same thing, more intensely, with every corrupt endorsement,
and with every new look at… ‘the numbers’ that come along. Obama’s
being Black does NOT justify his being discourteous to any woman in
America!!! And I don’t think most Blacks believe that it does!
When Obama told a crowd in Oregon that he will make his ’victory’
speech from there this next Tuesday, the last-straw-of-a-chance that
there is decency anywhere inside of Barack Obama got burned. Though
Obama has won only one state in months, he thinks that it’s a forgone
conclusion that voters in Oregon are naïve, near-sighted or blind. By
his words of premature celebration-in-the-end-zone, Obama shows that
he is UNSPORTSMANLIKE, inconsiderate of WOMEN, and he is taking the
citizens of Oregon and of America for granted!!!
Obama’s words have a more tyrannical sound now that President Bush and
John McCain are ignoring Clinton. They attack Obama as though he is
the presumptive nominee. And that is most inconsiderate of her,
because the race is still continuing. Jay Leno and the others who
make for-pay humor keep on berating Clinton, while she clings to the
hope that our failed political system and societal systems will show
her the fairness that she so rightly deserves. There’s something
fundamentally wrong in America, when THE most qualified person for the
Oval Office gets belittled by high-paid news commentators and by
shallow-mined comedians like Jay Leno. Is there no chivalry in
America?
With his normal bias, Wolf Blitzer asked Clinton if she’s staying in
the race. By that question, asked hundreds of times daily, the askers
are being inconsiderate of Clinton. Of course she wants to win. But
she doesn’t have the “luxury” that Obama has to presume to win.
“Right is on her side; but WRONG has a few more delegates.”
The founding fathers wanted us to have the closest thing to a
democracy. But in the 18th century it wasn’t practical to keep all of
the citizens informed; count the widely spread votes; and communicate
the results to the capital. In national elections and referenda,
electors would represent and relay the results of the various
contests. Our founding fathers would be appalled that we still have
the Electoral College system! That’s because present technology
allows the popular vote to be tallied, quickly. At no point did the
Constitution ever intend that ‘approximations’ of the votes of the
people—as by using state apportioned electors—should take precedence
over the accurately counted popular vote!
The fatally flawed, sequential primary system allocates a certain
number of delegates to each state in proportion to the states’
populations. That sounds good if those delegates were the ones
actually voting at the convention. And if they did so at the same
time. But the delegates are supposed to be representing those
citizens who did vote. That not-so-subtle difference makes everyone’s
votes have different degrees of importance. In a democracy—like this
country doesn’t come close to being—every citizen’s vote must carry
the same weight and importance as any other citizen’s vote.
Suppose two states of equal population have 25 delegates each. If one
state turns-out twice as many voters as the other, when the delegates
are allocated, the weight or value of the votes in the high-turn-up
state is exactly 50% as important as in the lesser turn-out state.
Folks, THAT is anti-democracy, and is thus unconstitutional by the
SPIRIT of the Constitution! The Electoral College is also
unconstitutional by the SPIRIT of the Constitution. The founding
fathers would never allow any ‘best approximation’ system of vote-
taking to hold sway over the actual, accurately-tallied, popular vote
taken without regard for where those votes were cast. If a thousand
people in Alaska want something, those votes should carry the same
weight as a thousand people in California who do.
The reason no one before me has corrected the glaring deficiencies in
our Constitution is because: “A politician’s power can be most evident
in a flawed system.” Those desiring nearly dictatorial powers, like
Barack Obama desires, don’t want a democracy. A democracy rightly
allocates the power to the PEOPLE. So, what glory can a politician
have, if the people get the credit? Folks, THAT is a justification
for ratifying my New Constitution! I have taken the ego component out
of the decision-making processes!
It’s likely that Barack Obama’s ego is swelling even as I write.
Imagine how bloated it will be if… “Because he’s Black, and that
changes things…” gets him elected to be President. But… “The bigger
they are, the harder they fall.” Obama’s ego—and his delusional
“entitlement” to be President—will cause the biggest failed presidency
in this country’s history. George W. Bush will look like a SAINT by
comparison!
The American people are largely oblivious to the threats against
democracy in this country. But unless democracy can be restored as
the foundation of this nation, corrupt influences will dominate every
area of our existence, and more and more. Even ‘fighting dirty’ won’t
protect us from the looming dangers of terrorism and wars. But if we
will start PLAYING FAIR, and being more equitable with ourselves and
with other nations, our hope of surviving, as a nation, past the next
millennium will improve. A thing as simple as fair play can protect
us by improving America’s image in the world.
With each new communication and transportation advance, planet Earth
shrinks in size. We Earthlings are all riding in the same boat. If
we row together we can be saved. But not if we willingly let the
tainted rules and processes lock us to a failed status quo. The
“changes” best for America, are the changes needed to unite us. A New
Constitution is poised for that purpose!
Please elect Hillary Rodham Clinton President of the United States Of
America!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
On May 14, 11:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JOHN EDWARDS GOES TO JAIL.
The New Constitution will be a bastion for democracy and fair play in
America! A democracy isn’t about who you know, or how influential
they think that they are. It isn’t about 'networking' to get some
leverage in an obviously corrupt system of government. And it isn’t
about pulling-the-wool-over-the-eyes of the electorate to try to use
them as pawns for one’s own selfish motives.
Barack Obama will look STUNNING in an orange prison uniform as he
gives interviews while looking between closely spaced steel bars.
Folks, screwing with our democracy is a treasonable offense!
Yesterday, John Edwards made an endorsement of “his ideal” for
President. By that act, Edwards is ‘influence peddling’. He, like
Bill Richardson, Tom Daschle, Bob Casey and so many others, has jumped
on the teeter totter to try to counter each and every increase in
momentum that Hillary Clinton gets. Those men are selfishly bent on
padding their own nests. With each endorsement that Obama gets, he
dilutes his might-have-been devotion to work for the best interests of
the electorate. Instead, he must now work for the whims of those to
whom he is beholden.
A good friend of mine told me that, while in office, Senator John
Edwards of NC wasn’t very good at his job. Apparently, Edwards
dropped out of Congress just in time to avoid going down in defeat in
NC. JFK was a well-liked pretty boy. With the proper goals and
actions, Edwards could have been another such youthful presence that
might have inspired this nation.
I now live in South Carolina. Very early I started getting pollsters’
phone calls. During such I was asked, regarding the SC primary, for
whom I would be voting. Because Edwards had “shown promise”, and
because he was born within 50 miles of where I was born, I vowed to
vote for the man. Then, Edwards started flooding the TV with his
campaign ads that touted how ‘poor’ his family was when he was born in
Seneca. Textile mills had closed, there; and Edwards kept saying that
workers are worth every bit as much as managers. He vowed he would
‘fight for’ workers.
Edwards is this multi-millionaire vowing to work for those he
apparently… “feels sorry for”. Edward’s ads were condescending and
effectively elitist. Most hard-working people are wise enough to know
that managers are deserving of more pay then they themselves receive.
And most hard-working people like the idea that the potential is there
for them to move up,too. What Edwards was implying amounts to
socialism. Fortunately, SC Democrats were smart enough to reject
Edward’s condescending attitude toward “their condition”.
As promised, I voted for Edwards. But I wasn’ttoosad to have him be
defeated. However, the racist, mindless, and anti-democracy ‘block
vote’ of those 90 plus percent of Black voters for Obama, didn’t boost
my hopes for America. Clearly, Hillary Clinton was, and still is, the
only qualified candidate. Yet, the shallow, racist issue that is now
wagging-the-mongrel is: Get a Black into the Oval Office, and to HELL
with the consequences for America…
Standing together on that podium, Obama and Edwards were these two
selfish elitists who are vowing to help… the poor. Not since FDR has
such a ‘platform’ gotten anyone elected to be President. So, as
broadly as those two were smiling, the chances that the USA will be
better off with them being on the same side is slim to none. And
smiles—ah la Jamal Simmons—should inspire NON trust, rather than
trust. As with used car salesman, if they smile at ‘the deal’—watch
out!
Where there are inappropriate smiles, it’s likely that there are
corrupt dealings. Tom Daschle “smiled” when James Carville proposed
that Clinton’s supporters would pay to redo the Michigan primary. If
“democracy’ had been part of Daschle’s and Obama’s value system, they
would have expedited letting Clinton get her fair share of the
delegates in FL and MI—earlier, rather than later! But as with the US
Supreme Court, Obama supporters pick-and-choose to ‘value’ the
unconstitutional ‘rules’ of the DNC above the fundamental RULE of
having democracy… IN a democracy!
So, as more and more people side with Obama’s RAPE of democracy,
newspaper columnists like Flavia Colgan smile at ‘the fantasy’. For
her, it’s not about doing what is right; it’s about having one’s own
selfish enjoyment. Barbara Walters “yielded” to those same fantasies
with a Black senator. Now, she wishes to elevate her own declining
celebrity by bragging about: “The blacker the berry, the sweeter the
juice.” Rejoice, whites everywhere, and SUPPORT the candidate of
those who are not satisfied with their own kind…
While the anti-democracy primary debacle plays out—like the
unsportsmanlike CAD that he is—Obama is prematurelycampaigning
against John McCain. For Obama, it’s a foregone conclusion the “the
numbers” will give him the nomination. Actually, if anything gives
him the nomination it will be the corrupt DNC’s urging that the super
delegates “commit” before the August convention. Those dreg,
political insiders who do so by publicly endorsing that CAD, Obama,
hope that their ‘straw of support’ will tilt the camel for Obama and
thus make Obama more beholden to that particular super delegate, or to
his ilk.
It’s a sad state of events when our could-be democratic processes keep
getting defeated at every turn. As such travesties keep happening,
the leaders who have been encouraging those very same treasonous
actions, are evincing the same ‘sick pleasure’ of a Flavia Colgan,
Barbara Walters, or Jamal Simmons.
“But where there be discontent, surely, there can be hope!”
That moron McCain continues to read from teleprompters in front of a
backdrop of American flags. And he is in direct violation of the New
Constitution! Politicians, candidates, and government office holders
aren’t America! America is the PEOPLE, and their positive SPIRIT,
collectively! Never again will those in government be considered to
be “the” USA. Rather, those in government shall be THE SERVANTS of
the USA, and of the PEOPLE! Never again will the American flag be
allowed to be denigrated by having those be used as a backdrops by
Government officials—other than the President and the Secretary of
State. Nor shall our cherished Stars and Stripes ever be used as a
backdrop to “legitimize” a TRAITOR to democracy like Barack Obama
surely is.
Those of you longing for “A Change You Can Believe In” should realize
that you have been, and are now being, flimflammed! Barack Obama is
this low life, MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE who will gladly destroy America—if
that advances his own selfish ends, and those of his corrupt endorsers
like John Edwards. Remember, Adolph Hitler was a GREAT public
speaker,too.
In the most positive vein, please vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton to
be President of the United States of America!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
On Apr 21, 9:37 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
SUPER DELEGATES CAN BRING AMERICA DOWN OR SAVE IT.
At every level of our social, economic, and political existence FAIR
PLAY has become the virtue least in evidence. Toooften the rule-of-
thumb is: “Do bad things unto others, before they can do bad things
unto you.” Such philosophy reigns supreme in the USA because: People
see others “getting ahead” by doing bad, often immoral, and sometimes
criminal things. By those examples, people figure they,too, have a
“right” to get ahead in those ways. Would-have-been ‘good people’,
are good whenever such virtue advances their purposes, and they are
bad whenever such vices will “benefit” them. By degrees, the majority
of Americans are… two faced.
The above moral decline in America can be reversed only by having
people come to realize that most people will BENEFIT simply by having
the great majority play fair! If there is a ‘trickle down’ effect
that benefits everyone, it is having people care about the effects of
their actions on their neighbors—far and wide. If businesses ‘seem’
to have prices that aretoohigh, some feel such prices justify their
shoplifting. But across America, shoplifting is a… ‘cost of doing
business’ that adds 15% to the cost of the products being sold. So,
part of the cause of the high prices—that some feel justifies their
shoplifting—is shoplifting itself!
When an American company can’t be price-competitive without out-
sourcing work to other countries, part of the reason for that is: the
cost of labor, here, is simplytoohigh. And the other costs of doing
business, are becomingtoogreat. Ask any company executive, and you
will hear that the cost of providing health care benefits to employees
has gone-through-the-roof. And you will hear that the cost of
litigation due to product liability suits has gone-through-the-roof.
As a ‘defense’, businesses employ expensive lawyers to side-step those
lawsuits. And lawyers will do so by lobbying for laws favorable to
businesses—at the expense of those who have been harmed.
Folks, America is in DIRE STRAITS, because our businesses and our
disparate groups aren’t fighting fair. Toofew of us get the Big
Picture! But if most could get the Big Picture—and act wisely based
on that knowledge—the majority of the socio-economic problems that
adversely affect every one of us would begin to SHRINK, and to the
benefit of everyone!
At this moment, the single greatest threat to the survival of the USA,
and perhaps to the survival of the entire human race is… BARACK
OBAMA… His is a campaign that is rooted in UNFAIR PLAY. The USA is
...
read more »- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- References:
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- Prev by Date: Re: Light always travels at c, energy is always conserved, and Jesu...
- Next by Date: Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- Previous by thread: Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- Next by thread: Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|