Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious

On May 21, 12:28 pm, jjs...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On May 21, 2:14 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:> On May 21, 8:38 am, jjs...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:


So, really instead of something obvious and simple, we didn't want
question the limits of relativity and came up with the expansion of
the Universe.

No because all observation points to speed of light being constant and
an expanding universe, try some self education.... why the hell am I
talking to the token physics crank... go away mike...


All observation points to loss of frequency, and expanding time.

That matches every observation.

Expanding space puts limits on the size and age of the Universe, and
that isn't always supported by observation.

Yes, the inflation period solves that.

But how many band-aids does expanding space need, before we realize
it's not the best mechanism to explain expanding time and a loss of
frequency?
.

Quantcast