Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious

On May 21, 2:32 pm, jjs...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On May 21, 4:35 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<snip>

Hubble redshift is what is observed, and f = 1 / t

Relative observer measurements, GR, SR, and Conservation of Energy,
this means nothing for c.


I agree.

But I think those theories have limits, and do not hold true
Universally across infinity.

EVIDENCE: Hubble redshift.

Plain and simple.

Energy is lost in aged photons (old idea) AND (here's the new idea)
the aged photon's velocity decreases, eventually limps in just above
absolute zero, and goes dead.

That is a novel description of the CMB and because the time it takes
for light to complete its journey increases - just as it does under
expansion - its predictions for supernova light curve and surface
brightness should be equal to expansion.
.

Quantcast