Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: jjsajd@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 09:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
On May 22, 4:14 am, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
Good debate over your wrong, fantastic...
Relative observer measurements, GR, SR, and Conservation of Energy,
this means nothing for c.
I agree.
But I think those theories have limits, and do not hold trueExcept that it agrees with observation
Universally across infinity.
EVIDENCE: Hubble redshift.Wrong we've been over this get it though your thick skull redshift
causing energy loss is wrong due to conservation of energy. Which you
agreed was correct.
<snip>
Wrong, energy loss violates conservation of energy, and speed loss
Energy is lost in aged photons (old idea) AND (here's the new idea)
the aged photon's velocity decreases, eventually limps in just above
absolute zero, and goes dead.
violates the lorentz invariant. You already agreed with me so you've
already agreed your wrong.
<snip, uninformed crap>
Cheers
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- References:
- Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: jjsajd
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: jjsajd
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: jjsajd
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: jjsajd
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: jjsajd
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: Michael Helland
- Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- Prev by Date: Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
- Next by Date: Re: electric field along an electromagnetic ray
- Previous by thread: Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- Next by thread: Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|