Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: Michael Helland <mobydikc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 07:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
On May 22, 9:41 am, jjs...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On May 22, 4:14 am, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
Relative observer measurements, GR, SR, and Conservation of Energy,
this means nothing for c.
I agree.
Good debate over your wrong, fantastic...
But I think those theories have limits, and do not hold true
Universally across infinity.
Except that it agrees with observation
Observations of finite space agree that energy is conserved across
infinity and light can travel infinitely far without slowing down?
LOL.
Have a little more kool-aid.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: jjsajd
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: jjsajd
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: jjsajd
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: jjsajd
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: jjsajd
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- From: jjsajd
- Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- Prev by Date: Re: Quantum Gravity 254.92: Another Direction Toward n: Critical Pair Theory in Groups/Sets/Posets
- Next by Date: Re: Centripetal Force & g forces
- Previous by thread: Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- Next by thread: Re: Expansion is wrong and its soooo freakin' obvious
- Index(es):