Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 04:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
NoEinstein wrote:
On May 23, 4:10�pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 22, 6:35�pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 22, 2:18�am, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 21, 7:16 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
If you are going to post a few thousand word essay on the subject
every few days, why not join the campaign directly and contribute?
Dear Eric: �I AM contributing! �� NoEinstein �
Yes, you are contributing off-topic noise about political crap to a
physics newsgroup.
What I mean is contribute your clearly large amount of free time to
the campaign of whoever you support.
Dear Eric: When was the last time you actually discussed science?
You are this college flunk-out needing work. You lift your sagging
ego by attacking someone who can talk science, AND work for the
betterment of mankind. Until you can get a mission in life, please
stop attacking me, because I have a mission. � NoEinstein
....a mission you say? What mission might that be?
.
- References:
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- Prev by Date: Re: question about strain resolution
- Next by Date: Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
- Previous by thread: Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- Next by thread: Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|