Re: What is Ether?

On May 24, 7:05 pm, bz <bz+...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I just looked at part of what you have published.
The page http://www.16pi2.com/eddy_currents.htm

There are apparent typographical errors [for example: As the magnet fell
through the tube and reached the points where the voltmeter probes were
attached, the resistance increased to 30 Ohm to 100 Ohm, depending on the
rate of drop.  As the magnet continued its drop passed the probe points,
the resistance returned to .4 Ohm.] I assume that you do NOT mean 30 and
100 ohms because those make no sense together with .4 ohms nor with your
graph, but rather .3 to 1.0 Ohms.

You are incorrect. I published the actual measurements of the
experiment as measured by the HP34970A DAQ switch. You need to
perform the experiment for yourself if you wish to question the
results.

There is also an apparent lack of understanding of what resistance is and
how one goes about measuring it.

Actually, the misunderstanding belongs to modern science. To begin
with, modern science incorrectly notates most units of charge, thus
incorrectly concluding that resistance is the reciprocal of
conductance. In reality, magnetic flux is the reciprocal of
conductance. Second, resistance is not a property of materials, it is
a property of the space in which electrons move. Materials can alter
the properties of space, thus causing what is perceived as resistance
(along with optical effects, friction, and other qualities).

When one is measuring very low resistance, one needs to use kelvin [4 wire]
measurement equipment if one hopes for any accuracy at all.****

You are trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill. The four wire
measurement technique would merely eliminate the resistance of the
lead wires. The lead wire resistance is less than 1% of the total
resistance, which is negligible. Whether using a four wire or two
wire resistance measurement, the data remains the same when the
measurement is made in whole units (Ohms). Your argument is
frivolous.

Also, anything that induces a dc voltage into the object being measured is
going to interfere with dc measurements of resistance.

You need to read the page again. I addressed this concern. The
change in voltmeter measurement was desirable as it clearly
demonstrates the math concerning eddy currents, which I presented on
the page. It is true that a DC current is being fed back into the
voltmeter. It is true that the DC potential changes the apparent
resistance measurement. This is exactly what is expected when eddy
currents are taken into consideration.

If you want to measure the actual resistance in the presence of eddy
currents, you are going to need to use a pulsed driving voltage or an ac
voltage

If the point was to merely measure the resistance relating to the
copper pipe, then there is no point in creating eddy current.
However, the point was to observe the apparent change in resistance
when a potential is induced by a moving magnetic field. That is
exactly what the graph shows, the apparent change in resistance, which
is indicative of the physics behind eddy current as quantified on the
page.

There is nothing magic about eddy currents and they are well known.

Not as well known as you think. There is a lot more that can be
learned about eddy current compared to what modern science thinks it
knows.

The fact that you did not realize that this is the proper explanation for
the phenomena you saw tells me that you need to go back and reexamine ALL
your assumptions and conclusions.

The fact that you did not understand the point of the experiment tells
me you need to go back and read the page more carefully. You also
need to study the theory underlying the units of the Aether Physics
Model.

please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.

Pardon granted.

Dave
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Measuring tiny unknown resistance?
    ... > Anyone know a simple way I can measure a small, unknown resistance? ... less than 100 ohms. ... On the 200 ohm scale the maximum resistance that can be measured ... take you measurement of your 0.5ohm to 1 ohm resistance and ...
    (sci.electronics.basics)
  • Re: IGNORE this DAMN FOOL
    ... Sorry - that should be resistance of the "output transformer primaries". ... Better is to add 10 ohms R between each anode and the OPT ... but that measurement is less critical than the voltage ... guitar amps with reasonably well-matched tubes and in circuit board amps ...
    (rec.audio.tubes)
  • Re: Multimeters (My first post to sci.electronics.basics)
    ... I set up two small lamps in series, and test the resistance ... > measured with the same multimeter as used to measure the total ... measurement current from the meter. ... If that's the case, each bulb has ...
    (sci.electronics.basics)
  • Chapter 19A from "Reflections III" - Step 2 response
    ... circuit (from plate to ground) with an HP-4815 Vector Impedance Meter. ... The resistance is found to be approximately 1400 ohms. ... one measurement made from the plate ...
    (rec.radio.amateur.antenna)
  • Re: Whats my amp putting out ???
    ... Resistance is a component of impedance. ... it will show you resistance. ... Some you can get 8 Ohms ... search and see how many websites list units of measurement for impedance. ...
    (rec.audio.car)