Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.


"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:QBp_j.125884$TT4.27298@xxxxxxxxxxxx
You seem happy, healthy and in need of a refresher course on
relativity! :-)

Why learn relativity again when it is just wrong if you jump frame of
reference.
Why not learn what actually happens to cause the clock to malfuntion (time
dilation)
instead of this "time changing rate SciFi thing" going on that even allows
time travel in itself.
and come up with a much better theory that works for everything in the
Universe?
Isn't that what people are trying to do anyway since Relativity does have
problems
with frame jumping?

I bet you could actually come up with a TOE if you actually read and thought
about the simple stuff I state about clocks and time.
( Yes, I do know you are smart Sam, but you seem to have forgotten what made
you
smart ... learning and thinking and yes....-re-thinking )

anyways..
Here is a new sig just for you because It is just so wierd to see you
post without adding it.

--
James Driscoll Jr
Space***.
:)


.

Loading