Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: "Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 11:39:09 -0400
"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:483aceb0$0$20345$9a6e19ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You don't even know what frame jumping is, Specimen.
Hi Greg!
Feel free to jump in a starship and travel at 0.9c.
and use your frame of reference clock to make sure planets are not in your
way.
LOL
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: G. L. Bradford
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- References:
- It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Greg Neill
- It is time, yet again. I am back.
- Prev by Date: Re: Conservation of Angular momentum question
- Next by Date: Re: (rev 4.5) Defining God correctly - and Heaven, and Hell - What ...
- Previous by thread: Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- Next by thread: Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading