Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 11:18:43 -0400
"Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:XuednYoxTvj-VafVnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:_Py_j.180720$yE1.23248@xxxxxxxxxxxx
I was thinking you've never learn relativity at all, nor
appreciated the fact that there has never been an observation
that has contradicted a prediction of relativity.
It has never been an observation inside the scope of relativity because it
won't accept frame jumping.
But alas, frame jumping is reality.
You don't even know what frame jumping is, Specimen.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- References:
- It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Spaceman
- It is time, yet again. I am back.
- Prev by Date: Re: Matrix as Set Transposition
- Next by Date: Re: Is a moon based needed to go to Mars?
- Previous by thread: Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- Next by thread: Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading