Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: "G. L. Bradford" <glbrad01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 14:50:00 -0400
"Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:7fadnT0NVqdIRKfVnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:483aceb0$0$20345$9a6e19ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYou don't even know what frame jumping is, Specimen.
Hi Greg!
Feel free to jump in a starship and travel at 0.9c.
and use your frame of reference clock to make sure planets are not in your
way.
LOL
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman
"0.9c" is relative. 'c' is not.
GLB
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- References:
- It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- From: Spaceman
- It is time, yet again. I am back.
- Prev by Date: Re: Impact Parameter
- Next by Date: Re: Gravity Probe B comes last in NASA review
- Previous by thread: Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- Next by thread: Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading