Re: It is time, yet again. I am back.

"G. L. Bradford" <glbrad01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EoOdnQejkqqzvKbVnZ2dnUVZ_tjinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Since the mid 1700s navigators have depended upon clocks to help travel
the seas. And since a traveler will have no idea of velocity -- no clue
concerning velocity -- while traveling the universe (in general), that
traveler will be heavily dependent upon clocks to be an aid in navigation
of
the universe. The traveler's [space] coordinates will estimates of
distances
in units of [light time] rather than miles or kilometers. Light seconds
being traveled [will not] be one to one with clock seconds passing. It's
an
all history universe out there and the traveler will cross it traveling
both
directions of history all at once.

Until it is an exact one to one, or a clock that adjusts for such
acceleration problems
is invented.
Space travelers that experience acceleration without adjusting the clock are
screwed if allowing the time dilated clock to be considered your 'real' time
traveled, and you will eventually crash.

It will merely be a repeat of the history of the clock.
That is really sad for physics people to not get such a simple problem with
the
clock and actually find the physical reason for the clock malfunction
instead
of this 'time changing rate complete bull***' that is being worshipped
today.

So basically, Go ahead fly a starship, swear that according to todays
physics
time changed rate for your traveling frame and crash into the thing that was
not supposed to be there yet according to your local 'travel' time
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman


.