Le Sage theory verses GR predictions


Short & to the point,

LeSage theory correctly accounts for,

1. The Pioneer drag (Drag = kv, Where k is the LeSagian momentum flux divided by the mean propagation speed
of the LeSagian particles ~ 7.1E-14 sec-1, and v = net speed in m/sec)

2. Net Thermal Planetary Emissions (Thermal Flux [Watts/m^2] = KM/r Where K is the LeSagian induction constant
~2.4E-19 m/sec^3, M is the mass of the body, r is the effective radius)

3. Titus-Bodes's Law See:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TJ4-4KNMB04-3&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=8a02dc081dbecf3dd3a2599e5d127ee7

4. The observed Galactic Rotation Profile See: http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0411292

For which GR does not either predict, or matches, observation of these.

For those that have been around long enough, they know that I predicted that the LeSage's model would correctly account for both #3
& #4. I also correctly (within 10%) predicted the net thermal emisson of Neptune before it was accurately measured by Voyager using
the thermal equation above.

Hmmm, what does Ockham's Razor tell us?

.