sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Black hole Paradigm shift leading to a TOE.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :The Happening
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: directions of gravity
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :The Happening
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Quantum Tunneling
  • From: BURT
• Re: Symmetrical
  • From: BURT
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :The Happening
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Physics of sound waves (reflection vs transmission) question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :The Happening
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :The Happening
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :The Happening
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :It has begun
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Symmetrical
  • From: Uncle Al
• Physics of sound waves (reflection vs transmission) question
  • From: Ker_01
• Re: Quantum Tunneling
  • From: tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Tunneling
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Dark Energy: 21st Century Version Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Precession effect on helicopter - Why 90 degrees?
  • From: Edward Green
• "Gravity"
  • From: Wen
• Symmetrical
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum Tunneling
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum Tunneling
  • From: rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Tunneling
  • From: john
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum Tunneling
  • From: PD
• Re: Quantum Tunneling
  • From: PD
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :It has begun
  • From: Just_Jackcd
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: mL
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Jun 30, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Quantum Tunneling
  • From: RichD
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: RichD
• Re: Double Helix Molecule (DNA)
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Quantum Tunneling
  • From: muser
• Re: Cylinder/piston pressure multiplier River water pump
  • From: Matos de Matos
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 273.5: 1 + sqrt(2) = Silver Ratio/number generates Pell Numbers
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 273.4: (1 + sqrt(n))/(n-1) (Generalization of Golden Mean)
  • From: OsherD
• Basti Newsgroup: computer science (public)
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Dark Energy: 21st Century Version Ether
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Re: Dark Energy: 21st Century Version Ether
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dark Energy: 21st Century Version Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Some fun stuff to think about
  • From: Spaceman
• Dark Energy: 21st Century Version Ether
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Re: Why is more inefficient for hydrogen propulsion *VS* hydrogen piston engines at highway speeds?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :It has begun
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :It has begun
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Are there applications for ultra-high-frequency electricity?
  • From: jimp
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :It has begun
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Are there applications for ultra-high-frequency electricity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are there applications for ultra-high-frequency electricity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Are there applications for ultra-high-frequency electricity?
  • From: jimp
• Are there applications for ultra-high-frequency electricity?
  • From: 2.7182818284590...
• Why is more inefficient for hydrogen propulsion *VS* hydrogen piston engines at highway speeds?
  • From: 2.7182818284590...
• Quantum Gravity 272.9: Jacobson Radical and PI (Probable Causation/Influence) Raise the Question: Why Wasn't the Algebra of Weighted Means More Developed?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :It has begun
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :It has begun
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :It has begun
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :It has begun
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :It has begun
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :It has begun
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :It has begun
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification :It has begun
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Cockcroft and Walton
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: directions of gravity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Cylinder/piston pressure multiplier River water pump
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Quantum Tunneling
  • From: PD
• Re: #1 book publishing by Archimedes Plutonium on the Internet
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: directions of gravity
  • From: zxcv_890
• Re: Cylinder/piston pressure multiplier River water pump
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: directions of gravity
  • From: zxcv_890
• Re: Double Helix Molecule (DNA)
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Cylinder/piston pressure multiplier River water pump
  • From: Sue...
• Inovabrasil 27_06_08 Indice PARCIAL (17 de 82 artigos postados)
  • From: Rogerio
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Rup
• Double Helix Molecule (DNA)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Quantum Tunneling
  • From: tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
• Re: Precession effect on helicopter - Why 90 degrees?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Precession effect on helicopter - Why 90 degrees?
  • From: bz
• Re: Precession effect on helicopter - Why 90 degrees?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Facism in the US, and Canada. I am in complete agreement with D Weitz on this one, Psychiatric Abuse is akin to Racism/Nazism and is touted by so-called "progressive" Universities everywhere. Things like this would make Hitler very happy.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Facism in the US, and Canada. I am in complete agreement with D Weitz on this one, Psychiatric Abuse is akin to Racism/Nazism and is touted by so-called "progressive" Universities everywhere. Things like this would make Hitler very happy.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Precession effect on helicopter - Why 90 degrees?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Cylinder/piston pressure multiplier River water pump
  • From: Matos de Matos
• Re: Quantum Tunneling
  • From: muser
• Re: Precession effect on helicopter - Why 90 degrees?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Precession effect on helicopter - Why 90 degrees?
  • From: Sammuel
• Re: Countdown to a black hole
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Precession effect on helicopter - Why 90 degrees?
  • From: Sammuel
• Re: Precession effect on helicopter - Why 90 degrees?
  • From: Sammuel
• Re: Precession effect on helicopter - Why 90 degrees?
  • From: Sammuel
• Re: Precession effect on helicopter - Why 90 degrees?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Precession effect on helicopter - Why 90 degrees?
  • From: Sammuel
• Re: Cylinder/piston pressure multiplier River water pump
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: jjsajd
• buying a 5-D “ SpaceTimeField ” ( hyoer-hyper-space ).
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Cylinder/piston pressure multiplier River water pump
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: CHIRAL gravitation on arxiv
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Solar System Compression Unit
  • From: Spaceman
• Solar System Compression Unit
  • From: Noke
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: BURT
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: directions of gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: directions of gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Black hole Paradigm shift leading to a TOE.
  • From: tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
• Re: directions of gravity
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: 140 $ per barrel !!
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: directions of gravity
  • From: Igor
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: directions of gravity
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• directions of gravity
  • From: zxcv_890
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: tidal forces from teh Moon creates Magma
  • From: Androcles
• Re: tidal forces from teh Moon creates Magma
  • From: Greg Neill
• CHIRAL gravitation on arxiv
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Nuclear Big Bang +Anti-matter
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Tidal Forces from the Moon creates Magma....
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Building a decent vacuum at the gravitational center of the Earth.
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Countdown to a black hole
  • From: BURT
• Re: Countdown to a black hole
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Cylinder/piston pressure multiplier River water pump
  • From: Matos de Matos
• Re: Tactical Planck Weapon
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Black hole Paradigm shift leading to a TOE.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Countdown to a black hole
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Relativistic density of momentum
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Countdown to a black hole
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Centripedal force not mv^2/r for non-contact forces?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Tactical Planck Weapon
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Tactical Planck Weapon
  • From: Noke
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Rup
• Re: Building a decent vacuum at the gravitational center of the Earth.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Cylinder/piston pressure multiplier River water pump
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Black hole Paradigm shift leading to a TOE.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: On Guidelines
  • From: bz
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Quantum Gravity 272.7: Some Remarkable Relationships Between Jacobson Radical Star/Circle Products and PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quantum Gravity 273.1: Hungary Relates Hyperdeterminants, Fundamental Set, Fermionic Entanglement
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Seraph a song...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Facism in the US, and Canada. I am in complete agreement with D Weitz ?on this one, Psychiatric Abuse is akin to Racism/Nazism and is touted by ?so-called "progressive" Universities everywhere. Things like this would make ?Hitler very happy.
  • From: jimp
• Facism in the US, and Canada. I am in complete agreement with D Weitz on this one, Psychiatric Abuse is akin to Racism/Nazism and is touted by so-called "progressive" Universities everywhere. Things like this would make Hitler very happy.
  • From: Huang
• Quantum Gravity 273.0: Australia Uses Fundamental Set in New Relativistic-Euclidean Geometries
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Larry Sanger's (A Founder of Wikipedia) Vendetta Against Osher Doctorow
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Building a decent vacuum at the gravitational center of the Earth.
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Larry Sanger's (A Founder of Wikipedia) Vendetta Against Osher Doctorow
  • From: western
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: Spaceman
• Cylinder/piston pressure multiplier River water pump
  • From: Matos de Matos
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum Tunneling
  • From: tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: QUANTUM ENIGMA, part 1
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jun 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Articles on Mathematics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Jun 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: mL
• QUANTUM ENIGMA, part 1
  • From: calvin
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Androcles
• On Guidelines
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: bz
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: Gamma-rays put limit on universe’s background light
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Articles on Mathematics
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Quantum Tunneling
  • From: PD
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: jjsajd
• Larry Sanger's (A Founder of Wikipedia) Vendetta Against Osher Doctorow
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: PD
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: PD
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: PD
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: bush GENIUS compared to IDIOTS gore, obama, mccain !!!!!!!
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• bush GENIUS compared to IDIOTS gore, obama, mccain !!!!!!!
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: PD
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: PD
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "I have been in several network marketing companies, but never have I seen a system this impressive that does so much soquickly!"
  • From: Uncle Al
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Rup
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Quantum Tunneling
  • From: muser
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The shape of a wave or field
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: PD
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: PD
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: PD
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: PD
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: PD
• Countdown to a black hole
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Quentin Grady
• 4-D fields diminish as entropy accrues ( net net ).
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Quentin Grady
• Re: Cockcroft and Walton
  • From: Ray Johnstone
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Quentin Grady
• "I have been in several network marketing companies, but never have I seen a system this impressive that does so much soquickly!"
  • From: yuva
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: hwabnig
• Re: now finally
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: hwabnig
• Re: Quantum Gravity 272.6: A Jacobson Radical Expression That Measures Statistical Dependence Via Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: now finally
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification
  • From: rick_sobie
• Quantum Gravity 272.6: A Jacobson Radical Expression That Measures Statistical Dependence Via Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Gamma-rays put limit on universe’s background light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification
  • From: rick_sobie
• M81: Feeding a Black Hole
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification
  • From: rick_sobie
• Gamma-rays put limit on universe’s background light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: The Emerging Mind :The up side of being a human
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :The up side of being a human
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: PD
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: now finally
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Seraph a song...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: now finally
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Can you nuke a Tsunami?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification
  • From: rick_sobie
• now finally
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• Re: frictional force question
  • From: sizors_1
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Zombification
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Can you nuke a Tsunami?
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Androcles
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 26 June 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Cockcroft and Walton
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Advantages of directive newsgroups
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Can you nuke a Tsunami?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can you nuke a Tsunami?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: THE SPLIT PERSONALITY OF ALBERT EINSTEIN
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Can you nuke a Tsunami?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Can you nuke a Tsunami?
  • From: jimp
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Can you nuke a Tsunami?
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Joe Cell (water car engine) a electrostatic generator?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Building a decent vacuum at the gravitational center of the Earth.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: shadow-forming wave
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Joe Cell (water car engine) a electrostatic generator?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Global Warming really alarming?
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Joe Cell (water car engine) a electrostatic generator?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Relativistic density of momentum
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: shadow-forming wave
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why gravitational lensing increases the brightness?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: bz
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Joe Cell (water car engine) a electrostatic generator?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Joe Cell (water car engine) a electrostatic generator?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Joe Cell (water car engine) a electrostatic generator?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Joe Cell (water car engine) a electrostatic generator?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why gravitational lensing increases the brightness?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Cockcroft and Walton
  • From: Ray Johnstone
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: Relativistic density of momentum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Joe Cell (water car engine) a electrostatic generator?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Joe Cell (water car engine) a electrostatic generator?
  • From: Valent
• Re: Joe Cell (water car engine) a electrostatic generator?
  • From: Valent
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• SPACE TIME ASTRONOMY WITH RE: ANISOTROPY UNIFYING STRONG QUANTUM NUCLEAR GRAVITATIONAL FORCES
  • From: rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gravity action
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Rup
• Re: Joe Cell (water car engine) a electrostatic generator?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Joe Cell (water car engine) a electrostatic generator?
  • From: Spaceman
• Joe Cell (water car engine) a electrostatic generator?
  • From: Valent
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Gabby
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Tom Potter
• Relativistic density of momentum
  • From: Eoghan
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is Global Warming really alarming?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: shadow-forming wave
  • From: hwabnig
• Quantum Gravity 272.5: Jacobson Radical in Quantum Theory: France and Slovak Republic
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 272.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Versus The Paradox of Non-Conservation of Energy in GR
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Benj
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Benj
• Re: Is Global Warming really alarming?
  • From: Benj
• Re: As usual...
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Is Global Warming really alarming?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Quantum Gravity 272.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Versus The Paradox of Non-Conservation of Energy in GR
  • From: Huang
• Re: frictional force question
  • From: PD
• Re: Welcome to Basti Newsgroups (sites)
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: BURT
• Re: frictional force question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: BURT
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Gabby
• Quantum Gravity 272.4: Outline of Proof of 272.3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: frictional force question
  • From: sizors_1
• Quantum Gravity 272.3: P(x-->y)P(z-->y) = yox + yoz - xoz + P(x+z --> y^2), where yox is Jacobson Radical Circle Product
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 272.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Versus The Paradox of Non-Conservation of Energy in GR
  • From: OsherD
• Building a decent vacuum at the gravitational center of the Earth.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: PD
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Time symmetric physical laws
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: As usual...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: PD
• Welcome to Basti Newsgroups (sites)
  • From: Mehran Basti
• shadow-forming wave
  • From: Hendrick
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: The standard of time and identical clocks
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The standard of time and identical clocks
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Gabby
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Igor
• Re: The standard of time and identical clocks
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: PD
• Re: The standard of time and identical clocks
  • From: Sue...
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: CERN hopes LHC report will dispel doomsday fears
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The standard of time and identical clocks
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The standard of time and identical clocks
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The standard of time and identical clocks
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: fred . zakity
• Basti Newsgroup (Math or Physics)
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: The standard of time and identical clocks
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Quantum Gravity 272.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Versus The Paradox of Non-Conservation of Energy in GR
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The standard of time and identical clocks
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The standard of time and identical clocks
  • From: BURT
• Re: The standard of time and identical clocks
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: z
• Has anyone tested MOND?
  • From: fred . zakity
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The standard of time and identical clocks
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Cockcroft and Walton
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is Global Warming really alarming?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Binaural Brainwave Generator
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: frictional force question
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Why gravitational lensing increases the brigtness?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why gravitational lensing increases the brigtness?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Gabby
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The standard of time and identical clocks
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The standard of time and identical clocks
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: frictional force question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: frictional force question
  • From: PD
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Lester Zick
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: frictional force question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Why gravitational lensing increases the brigtness?
  • From: Tegiri Nenashi
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: bz
• Can the Special Theory of Relativity be "explained"
  • From: andy everett
• Re: frictional force question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: frictional force question
  • From: PD
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: frictional force question
  • From: PD
• Re: CERN hopes LHC report will dispel doomsday fears
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The standard of time and identical clocks
  • From: Spaceman
• Cockcroft and Walton (2)
  • From: Ray Johnstone
• Cockcroft and Walton
  • From: Ray Johnstone
• Re: CERN hopes LHC report will dispel doomsday fears
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Global Warming really alarming?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• CERN hopes LHC report will dispel doomsday fears
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Binaural Brainwave Generator
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: PD
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: frictional force question
  • From: Cwatters
• “ up ” is the place with less pressure from above.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: PD
• Re: ARTHUR EDDINGTON (AND DIVINE ALBERT)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Box shaped lighting strikes?!
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is Global Warming really alarming?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is Global Warming really alarming?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Global Warming really alarming?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: As usual...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: PD
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: PD
• Re: Using "Google Trends" to discover causes and effects.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Using "Google Trends" to discover causes and effects.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: bz
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: AETHER: The Physicalists' God
  • From: Laurent
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Thomas
• Re: Why gravitational lensing increases the brigtness?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why gravitational lensing increases the brigtness?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Quentin Grady
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Quentin Grady
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Quentin Grady
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Quentin Grady
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Quentin Grady
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Quentin Grady
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Quentin Grady
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: As usual...
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 272.2: What the Phases Do in the Lucas Numbers
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 272.1: 272.0 Related to Fibonacci Identities
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 272.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Versus The Paradox of Non-Conservation of Energy in GR
  • From: Huang
• Re: Why gravitational lensing increases the brigtness?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 272.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Versus The Paradox of Non-Conservation of Energy in GR
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The global population curve
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Is Global Warming really alarming?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• As usual...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: frictional force question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why gravitational lensing increases the brigtness?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Global Warming really alarming?
  • From: Edward Green
• Is Global Warming really alarming?
  • From: Gabby
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: frictional force question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: john
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Jim Black
• Why gravitational lensing increases the brigtness?
  • From: Tegiri Nenashi
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• frictional force question
  • From: sizors_1
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: PD
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Quantum Gravity 270.91: South Americans Hook Up With 2 Time-Analogous Phases in Quintessence Scalar Field Potentials
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: The global population curve
  • From: tadchem
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: PD
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: bz
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The SR definition led physicists to a 100 years of wild goose chase.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Application for membership (Physics)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: z
• Re: The global population curve
  • From: jimp
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Rup
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: PD
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: The global population curve
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The global population curve
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The global population curve
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The global population curve
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The global population curve
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The global population curve
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The global population curve
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Quentin Grady
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• A simple problem that puzzles me
  • From: Quentin Grady
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Contact email for Basti Newsgroups
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Stay Off Satan’s Road (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: Huang
• Contact email for Basti Newsgroups
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Application for membership (Physics)
  • From: eBayer
• Re: decimal to binary conversion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: decimal to binary conversion
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Application for membership (Physics)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The global population curve
  • From: WG
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Silly photon question
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: 3-D or 4-D space?
  • From: Sue...
• Application for membership (Physics)
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Silly photon question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: 3-D or 4-D space?
  • From: Igor
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Igor
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Pulsar to Black Hole
  • From: PD
• Re: johnreed take 24 - repost
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Pulsar to Black Hole
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Pulsar to Black Hole
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Expelled: If you don't believe in holy physics dogma ; you're fired!
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• johnreed take 24 - repost
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Earth's Axis Slipping
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The global population curve
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: 3-D or 4-D space?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: 3-D or 4-D space?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: 3-D or 4-D space?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: bz
• 3-D or 4-D space?
  • From: qquito
• Re: Quantum Gravity 270.91: South Americans Hook Up With 2 Time-Analogous Phases in Quintessence Scalar Field Potentials
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• An interesting "Google Trend"
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Application for membership
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Pulsar to Black Hole
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Pulsar to Black Hole
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Rup
• Re: Earth's Axis Slipping
  • From: Jamie
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Some drawbacks to the standard model...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Application for membership
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Gravity Probe B Defunded?
  • From: Franky
• Application for membership
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Quantum Gravity 270.92: Guess What is (Probably) Causal in the South American Paper?
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 270.92: Guess What is (Probably) Causal in the South American Paper?
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 270.91: South Americans Hook Up With 2 Time-Analogous Phases in Quintessence Scalar Field Potentials
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 270.4: USC (University of Southern California) in USA Relates to Track-Switching By 2-Time Gravitational Physics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The global population curve
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: bz
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Earth's Axis Continuing to Slip
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Earth's Axis Slipping
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum Gravity 270.8: Now Throw in Exponential Nature of Inflation to 2-Time Scenario
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Basti Newsgroup
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Biased gyros.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Biased gyros.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Black holes disproven Now
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Sam Wormley
• No wonder they needed a rubber ruler (length contraction)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The global population curve
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Basti Newsgroup
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: The global population curve
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Basti Newsgroup
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• The global population curve
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Basti Newsgroup
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: NASA's next trillion dollar program
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Basti Newsgroup
  • From: none
• Re: Creating a nuclear winter to counteract global warming
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Creating a nuclear winter to counteract global warming
  • From: Cwatters
• Stay Off Satan’s Road (is Copyrighted.)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Creating a nuclear winter to counteract global warming
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: TAM6 Call for papers: James Randi - blaspheming atheist fraud and his army of robot zombie followers
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 272.0: Quantum Mechanics As an Artificially Closed System via Schrodinger Equation and Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Nuo
• Re: Uusi kanava "Viisi"
  • From: Pekka Aho
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Creating a nuclear winter to counteract global warming
  • From: 2.7182818284590...
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: What is the shortest wavelength known for a photon?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Biased gyros.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: NASA's next trillion dollar program
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: TAM6 Call for papers: James Randi - blaspheming atheist fraud and his army of robot zombie followers
  • From: Benj
• Car Runs best on Air...(Hybrid)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Biased gyros.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What is the shortest wavelength known for a photon?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: bz
• Re: Quantum Gravity 270.9: USC Again and Phases as Different Types of Adjacent Regions in Space and/or Time and/or Anything Else Physical
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 270.9: USC Again and Phases as Different Types of Adjacent Regions in Space and/or Time and/or Anything Else Physical
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Basti Newsgroup
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Quantum Gravity 270.7: More Riccati Slow/Fast Times
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Basti Newsgroup
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Quantum Gravity 270.8: Now Throw in Exponential Nature of Inflation to 2-Time Scenario
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Basti Newsgroup
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Uncle Al's on the bi-polar roller coaster.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Basti Newsgroup
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: TAM6 Call for papers: James Randi - blaspheming atheist fraud and his army of robot zombie followers
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Black holes disproven Now
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Black holes disproven Now
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum Gravity 270.7: More Riccati Slow/Fast Times
  • From: Spaceman
• Quantum Gravity 270.7: More Riccati Slow/Fast Times
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Pulsar to Black Hole
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Rationalization and inquiry
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Rationalization and inquiry
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Pulsar to Black Hole
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Rationalization and inquiry
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Rationalization and inquiry
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Rationalization and inquiry
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Rationalization and inquiry
  • From: rick_sobie
• Quantum Gravity 270.6: Does Switching from k > 0 to k < 0 in dy/dt = ky(1 - y) Yield Change from Fast to Slow Times?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Rationalization and inquiry
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Rationalization and inquiry
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Quantum Gravity 270.4: USC (University of Southern California) in USA Relates to Track-Switching By 2-Time Gravitational Physics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Rationalization and inquiry
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Strong force question
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Strong force question
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Quantum Gravity 270.4: USC (University of Southern California) in USA Relates to Track-Switching By 2-Time Gravitational Physics
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Rationalization and inquiry
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Rationalization and inquiry
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Rationalization and inquiry
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Strong force question
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Rationalization and inquiry
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Quantum Gravity 270.4: USC (University of Southern California) in USA Relates to Track-Switching By 2-Time Gravitational Physics
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Rationalization and inquiry
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Rationalization and inquiry
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: How bare math equations alone can create physical reality.
  • From: No Bull Prize
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Rationalization and inquiry
  • From: rick_sobie
• Quantum Gravity 270.5: Limit of Logistic Differential Equation Satisfies 2-Time Scenario
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Rationalization and inquiry
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Binaural Brainwave Generator
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Faster than light ?????
  • From: Spaceman
• Basti Newsgroup
  • From: Basti05b
• Re: Faster than light ?????
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Strong force question
  • From: Craig Franck
• Re: Faster than light ?????
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Strong force question
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Faster than light ?????
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Faster than light ?????
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Strong force question
  • From: Craig Franck
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Questions about gluons and QCD!
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Faster than light ?????
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: NASA's next trillion dollar program
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Faster than light ?????
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Quantum Gravity 270.4: USC (University of Southern California) in USA Relates to Track-Switching By 2-Time Gravitational Physics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Another Bullet Cluster
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: NASA's next trillion dollar program
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Biased gyros.
  • From: Uncle Al
• "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Nuo
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Pulsar to Black Hole
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: NASA's next trillion dollar program
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Biased gyros.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Biased gyros.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Faster than light ?????
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 270.3: What "Slow Time" Looks Like in Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 270.2: Could Inflation Be "Slow Time"?
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 270.1: Are There Causal and Non-Causal Time Axes?
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 271.4: Jacobson Radical Part of Ternions, Found Important in (Quantum) Physics By Austria and Slovak Republic
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: NASA's next trillion dollar program
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Another Bullet Cluster
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: NASA's next trillion dollar program
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Twin Stars Not So Identical
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Another Bullet Cluster
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Faster than light ?????
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Biased gyros.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• NASA's next trillion dollar program
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Pulsar to Black Hole
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Don't ask about things you can't observe.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The Emerging Mind :The Conscious Computers
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :The Conscious Computers
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: The Emerging Mind :The Conscious Computers
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :The Conscious Computers
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind :The Conscious Computers
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Language and speech
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Language and speech
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Igor
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 20 Jun 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Pulsar to Black Hole
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: The Emerging Mind :Religion
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about strain
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Another funny thing about rubber ruler world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Nuo
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Car on water which instead of over 20 l/100km burns only aroun ...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Mars Phoenix provides further evidence that Viking may have m...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Emerging Mind :The Conscious Computers
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Question about strain
  • From: lionelgreenstreet
• nano micro vision control process and system fast moving substrates or fabrics
  • From: wernado
• Re: Quantum Gravity 271.3: U.K. and NYU Paper Also Have a Fundamental Combinatorics Quantity, the Multivariate Tutte Polynomial
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 271.3: U.K. and NYU Paper Also Have a Fundamental Combinatorics Quantity, the Multivariate Tutte Polynomial
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 271.2: The U.K. and NYU (USA) Find a Curious Explanation of the Number 32/27 = 2^5/3^3 in Relating Statistical Physics, Combinatorics of Graphs and Matroids, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: These are jobs that Americans dont want.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: These are jobs that Americans dont want.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Sam Wormley
• physicsworld.com newswire (Week 25)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Some drawbacks to the standard model...
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Faster than light ?????
  • From: katbo
• Quantum Gravity 271.1: Catalan Numbers, Hilbert Series, and Alternating Polynomials
  • From: OsherD
• Re: These are jobs that Americans dont want.
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Some drawbacks to the standard model...
  • From: Igor
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Igor
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Igor
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: TAM 6 Call for papers: James Randi - little lying atheist fraud
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Language and speech
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Language and speech
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Language and speech
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Language and speech
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Language and speech
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Language and speech
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: What if: Romans see potential of Steam Power?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Sun, Earth, Venus and Mars must be on same level of hierarchy
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Expelled: If you don't believe in holy physics dogma ; you're fired!
  • From: Benj
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Faster than light ?????
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Some drawbacks to the standard model...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Expelled: If you don't believe in holy physics dogma ; you're fired!
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: In a Monadic hypothesis, there is no need for an arrow of time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Spinning Dumbbell ????
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Language and speech
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Language and speech
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Language and speech
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Language and speech
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Faster than light ?????
  • From: No Bull Prize
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• E=mc^2 vs .5mv^2
  • From: Tom Impelluso
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: In a Monadic hypothesis, there is no need for an arrow of time
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Language and speech
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Language and speech
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Language and speech
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Language and speech
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Igor
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Igor
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A Game America Plays (is Copyrighted)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: BURT
• Re: A Game America Plays (is Copyrighted)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Shape of Universe Uncertain.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: In a Monadic hypothesis, there is no need for an arrow of time
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: If the universe goes on forever
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Mass resists changes in Gamma
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Spinning Dumbbell ????
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Wave Power. Is it the answer?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What if: Romans see potential of Steam Power?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Faster than light ?????
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Car on water which instead of over 20 l/100km burns only aroun ...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Shape of Universe Uncertain.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Nuo
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Re: What if: Romans see potential of Steam Power?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: What if: Romans see potential of Steam Power?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Online Tutoring
  • From: dmjoshi1@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• A finitely sized Universe with an infinite force? Hmmm
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: greysky
• Re: NGen to supply hydrogen to the world car market as an offshoot....
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Horatio
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spinning Dumbbell ????
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 271.0: U.K.'s Quantum Chromatic Numbers + Physics Phases + Pterosaur Shoulders = Expansive Force of Universe?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: These are jobs that Americans dont want.
  • From: Huang
• Re: Need Help -- Distance vs Height
  • From: Photon713
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: The Emerging Mind : The Turing Test, Searle and the Chinese Room
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind : The Turing Test, Searle and the Chinese Room
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind : The Turing Test, Searle and the Chinese Room
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: AdamG
• Re: The Emerging Mind : The Subconscious
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind : The Subconscious
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: In a Monadic hypothesis, there is no need for an arrow of time
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: In a Monadic hypothesis, there is no need for an arrow of time
  • From: Igor
• Re: Need Help -- Distance vs Height
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Biharmonic eqn and linear elasticity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Biharmonic eqn and linear elasticity
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Need Help -- Distance vs Height
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: The Emerging Mind : The Subconscious
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind : The Subconscious
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Petitio principii in "Classical Mechanics" - an open letter to Professor John Taylor
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Petitio principii in "Classical Mechanics" - an open letter to Professor John Taylor
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: The Emerging Mind : The Subconscious
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Car That Runs on Water [debunked]
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Probability functions, part1
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Time. /My opinion./
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: NGen to supply hydrogen to the world car market as an offshoot....
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Life Cooked Up in Outer Space?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Need Help -- Distance vs Height
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Need Help -- Distance vs Height
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spinning Dumbbell ????
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why is it windier on ocean than on land?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Nuo
• Probability functions, part 2
  • From: richardskaa
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: Androcles
• Probability functions, part1
  • From: richardskaa
• Need Help -- Distance vs Height
  • From: Photon713
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: AdamG
• Re: Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Effect of temperature on sound wave
  • From: AdamG
• Time. /My opinion./
  • From: socratus
• Biharmonic eqn and linear elasticity
  • From: tttttesten
• Re: These are jobs that Americans dont want.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: NGen to supply hydrogen to the world car market as an offshoot....
  • From: tadchem
• Quantum Gravity 270.0: Harvard, CERN (Geneva), and Russians Bring Back Superluminality
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: These are jobs that Americans dont want.
  • From: Huang
• Re: Dear Spaceshit....
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Dear Spaceshit....
  • From: Greg Neill
• Life Cooked Up in Outer Space?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dear Spaceshit....
  • From: Spaceman
• Disorder puts the brakes on matter waves
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dear Spaceshit....
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum Gravity 268.98: (1,1, ...,1) Bounds in Quantum Measurements and Tomography from Western Canada
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Re: These are jobs that Americans dont want.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Spaceman
• Quantum Gravity 268.99: More Re U. Calgary's f(1,...,1) Quantum Bounds
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Quantum Gravity 268.98: (1,1, ...,1) Bounds in Quantum Measurements and Tomography from Western Canada
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: In a Monadic hypothesis, there is no need for an arrow of time
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Who is who?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: In a Monadic hypothesis, there is no need for an arrow of time
  • From: Igor
• Re: SOLUTIONS MANUALS GETSOLUTION TEAM 2008
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dear Spaceshit....
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dear Spaceshit....
  • From: BURT
• Re: Dear Spaceshit....
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dear Spaceshit....
  • From: BURT
• Re: Dear Spaceshit....
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percentage of the universe taken up by matter
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: BURT
• Re: water temperature and energy
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Dear Spaceshit....
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: The Emerging Mind : The Mind Body Problem
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Dear Spaceshit....
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Emerging Mind : The Mind Body Problem
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: water temperature and energy
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dear Spaceshit....
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Centripedal force not mv^2/r for non-contact forces?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: The Emerging Mind : The quantum mind
  • From: rick_sobie
• In a Monadic hypothesis, there is no need for an arrow of time
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: The Emerging Mind : The quantum mind
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: The Emerging Mind : What does it mean to be alive
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind : The Mind Body Problem
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind : The Mind Body Problem
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: The Emerging Mind : The Mind Body Problem
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Why is it windier on ocean than on land?
  • From: dedanoe
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Nuo
• Re: trialities and vortices
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: These are jobs that Americans dont want.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Centripedal force not mv^2/r for non-contact forces?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Genepax
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: Genepax
  • From: AussieLondoner
• Re: Genepax
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: water temperature and energy
  • From: Androcles
• Who is who?
  • From: socratus
• Re: How to expand Debye potentials of a plane wave into spherical harmonics?
  • From: Bob Cain
• trialities and vortices
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Quantum Gravity 268.97: 0 and 1 or Infinity in Mathematics and Physics
  • From: OsherD
• Centripedal force not mv^2/r for non-contact forces?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: These are jobs that Americans dont want.
  • From: jimp
• Re: These are jobs that Americans dont want.
  • From: Huang
• Re: Percentage of the universe taken up by matter
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Percentage of the universe taken up by matter
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Three Modest Inquiries on the Aether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dear Spaceshit....
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dear Spaceshit....
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Dear Spaceshit....
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ceramics in microwave ovens (was Re: Cell phone popcorn)
  • From: jimp
• Re: water temperature and energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• water temperature and energy
  • From: md
• Re: ceramics in microwave ovens (was Re: Cell phone popcorn)
  • From: bz
• Re: Dear Spaceshit....
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Three Modest Inquiries on the Aether
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Percentage of the universe taken up by matter
  • From: Anon Email
• Re: These are jobs that Americans dont want.
  • From: OsherD
• Dear Spaceshit....
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 269.0: Princeton U. Brings Back Warm Inflation With Staggered Multifield Scenario
  • From: OsherD
• These are jobs that Americans dont want.
  • From: Huang
• Re: Three Modest Inquiries on the Aether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ceramics in microwave ovens (was Re: Cell phone popcorn)
  • From: jimp
• Re: Three Modest Inquiries on the Aether
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Concluding remarks
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Three Modest Inquiries on the Aether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ceramics in microwave ovens (was Re: Cell phone popcorn)
  • From: bz
• Re: Three Modest Inquiries on the Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ceramics in microwave ovens (was Re: Cell phone popcorn)
  • From: jimp
• Re: Three Modest Inquiries on the Aether
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Effect of pressure on freezing point
  • From: Cwatters
• Quantum Gravity 268.96: y/x - x/y = 1 Generates the Golden Mean and sqrt(5)
  • From: OsherD
• ceramics in microwave ovens (was Re: Cell phone popcorn)
  • From: bz
• Re: The Emerging Mind : Making the leap to abstract thought
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind : What then the will
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind : What then learning
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Genepax
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Emerging Mind : What then contemplation
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind : What then intelligence
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: A Game America Plays (is Copyrighted)
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: concentric rings of 16
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Physics and trialities
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Three Modest Inquiries on the Aether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Emerging Mind : What then free will
  • From: rick_sobie
• A Game America Plays (is Copyrighted)
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Wash your Clothes with a cup of water
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Emerging Mind : What then free will
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Geometry of matter's wave function
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: concentric rings of 16
  • From: Igor
• Re: Three Modest Inquiries on the Aether
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why is it windier on ocean than on land?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Physics and trialities
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Quantum Gravity 268.95: But Where is My Mechanism for Inverting Force?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Spinning Dumbbell ????
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Cell phone popcorn
  • From: jimp
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: rbwinn
• Quantum Gravity 268.94: Is Quantum Gravity Just Changing from Addition to Subtraction (F to -F) or From F to 1/F?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Three Modest Inquiries on the Aether
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why is it windier on ocean than on land?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why is it windier on ocean than on land?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Spinning Dumbbell ????
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• NASA tries to wrap fire with paper
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Why is it windier on ocean than on land?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Cell phone popcorn
  • From: bz
• Quantum Gravity 268.93: From F = Gm1m2/r^2 to F (or F_1) = r^2/(Gm1m2)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why is it windier on ocean than on land?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why is it windier on ocean than on land?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Ino
• Re: oops, the milky way isn't Carbon, it's Oxygen
  • From: john
• Re: Why is it windier on ocean than on land?
  • From: Spaceman
• concentric rings of 16
  • From: john
• Re: oops, the milky way isn't Carbon, it's Oxygen
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 268.92: P '(A-->B) + P ' (B-->A) = 2 Again
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why is it windier on ocean than on land?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physics and trialities
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Genepax
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: Cell phone popcorn
  • From: jimp
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Ongelma Telewell tw-ea510 v3 ja wds yhteydessä
  • From: Juhana Mäki
• Quantum Gravity 268.91: More Re Mass/Energy, Big Bang, Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Getting power to a rotating table
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Quantum Gravity 268.9: Did Mass/Energy Cause the Big Bang, the Big Bang Cause Mass/Energy, or Both?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Why is it windier on ocean than on land?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anomalous Popping of Popcorn?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Cell phone popcorn
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Cell phone popcorn
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Anomalous Popping of Popcorn?
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Percentage of the universe taken up by matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: PHYSICAL ASTRONOMY
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: 3 dimensional curved space is the universal gravitational field
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Why is it windier on ocean than on land?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: oops, the milky way isn't Carbon, it's Oxygen
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Household Electricity Question
  • From: Anon Email
• Re: Percentage of the universe taken up by matter
  • From: Anon Email
• Re: Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: Anon Email
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Cell phone popcorn
  • From: jimp
• Re: Cell phone popcorn
  • From: jimp
• Re: Cell phone popcorn
  • From: bz
• Re: Effect of pressure on freezing point
  • From: tadchem
• Re: PHYSICAL ASTRONOMY
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Physics and trialities
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Cell phone popcorn
  • From: bz
• Re: Three Modest Inquiries on the Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why is it windier on ocean than on land?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Three Modest Inquiries on the Aether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ANISOTROPY UNIFYING STRONG QUANTUM NUCLEAR GRAVITATIONAL FORCES: MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL SOLUTION TO CLASSICAL ORBITAL ATOMIC THEORY FUSING WITH QUANTUM "ELECTRONIC CLOUD" PHYSICS THEORY: A "BLACK-HOLE EFFECT"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why is it windier on ocean than on land?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Anomalous Popping of Popcorn?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PHYSICAL ASTRONOMY
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physics and trialities
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Anomalous Popping of Popcorn?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why is it windier on ocean than on land?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Anomalous Popping of Popcorn?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Three Modest Inquiries on the Aether
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Anomalous Popping of Popcorn?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Anomalous Popping of Popcorn?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Cell phone popcorn
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Anomalous Popping of Popcorn?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anomalous Popping of Popcorn?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: oops, the milky way isn't Carbon, it's Oxygen
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why is it windier on ocean than on land?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Anomalous Popping of Popcorn?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why is it windier on ocean than on land?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Anomalous Popping of Popcorn?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Anomalous Popping of Popcorn?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anomalous Popping of Popcorn?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Effect of pressure on freezing point
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: ScienceNOW Daily News: The Ozone Layer's Unwelcome Return?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Cell phone popcorn
  • From: jimp
• Re: Anomalous Popping of Popcorn?
  • From: Greg Neill
• oops, the milky way isn't Carbon, it's Oxygen
  • From: john
• Re: Light is a force
  • From: BURT
• Re: Anomalous Popping of Popcorn?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Anomalous Popping of Popcorn?
  • From: Spaceman
• Anomalous Popping of Popcorn?
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Why is it windier on ocean than on land?
  • From: 2.7182818284590...
• Re: ScienceNOW Daily News: The Ozone Layer's Unwelcome Return?
  • From: bz
• Re: Cell phone popcorn
  • From: bz
• Re: Effect of pressure on freezing point
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light is a force
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: ANISOTROPY UNIFYING STRONG QUANTUM NUCLEAR GRAVITATIONAL FORCES: MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL SOLUTION TO CLASSICAL ORBITAL ATOMIC THEORY FUSING WITH QUANTUM "ELECTRONIC CLOUD" PHYSICS THEORY: A "BLACK-HOLE EFFECT"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Effect of pressure on freezing point
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ScienceNOW Daily News: The Ozone Layer's Unwelcome Return?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Physics and trialities
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Quantum Gravity 268.8: Supreme Court Example of Plurality-Orientation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Cell phone popcorn
  • From: jimp
• Re: Cell phone popcorn
  • From: jimp
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Cell phone popcorn
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: Edward Green
• Quantum Gravity 268.7: Individual Justification for Fundamental Set
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: PHYSICAL ASTRONOMY
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Percentage of the universe taken up by matter
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Percentage of the universe taken up by matter
  • From: dedanoe
• Quantum Gravity 268.6: Probabilistic "Justification" of Fundamental Set
  • From: OsherD
• PHYSICAL ASTRONOMY
  • From: rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Percentage of the universe taken up by matter
  • From: Spaceman
• Quantum Gravity 268.5: Physical and Statistical "Justification" of Fundamental Set
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• "Gravity"
  • From: Ino
• Re: is the EM field a complex vector ?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Percentage of the universe taken up by matter
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Physics and trialities
  • From: tadchem
• Re: ScienceNOW Daily News: The Ozone Layer's Unwelcome Return?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Physics and trialities
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Cell phone popcorn
  • From: bz
• Re: ScienceNOW Daily News: The Ozone Layer's Unwelcome Return?
  • From: bz
• Re: Percentage of the universe taken up by matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 13 Jun 08 Washington, DC
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• test, please ignore
  • From: Qubing
• Quantum Gravity 268.4: A Reminder About sqrt(2), sqrt(5), 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 13
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Quantum Gravity 268.3: Where Did The 26 in Poland's Results Come From?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 268.2: Poland Using 26 Discovers Photonic Portal Between Charged and Uncharged Universes
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 268.2: Poland Using 26 Discovers Photonic Portal Between Charged and Uncharged Universes
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Percentage of the universe taken up by matter
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Household Electricity Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Household Electricity Question
  • From: jimp
• Re: Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: Anon Email
• Percentage of the universe taken up by matter
  • From: Anon Email
• Re: Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: Androcles
• Household Electricity Question
  • From: Anon Email
• Re: Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: Anon Email
• Re: Desktop Continental Drift
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: ScienceNOW Daily News: The Ozone Layer's Unwelcome Return?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Desktop Continental Drift
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Apocalypse Now: NASA Martian soil micrograph shows many clear cell remains
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: ScienceNOW Daily News: The Ozone Layer's Unwelcome Return?
  • From: bz
• Re: Desktop Continental Drift
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: ScienceNOW Daily News: The Ozone Layer's Unwelcome Return?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Some huge Martian glia remains could be lymph nodes
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Quantum Gravity 268.2: Poland Using 26 Discovers Photonic Portal Between Charged and Uncharged Universes
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Quantum Gravity 268.2: Poland Using 26 Discovers Photonic Portal Between Charged and Uncharged Universes
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is this a Thermal Imager?
  • From: Gabby
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 13 Jun 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 13 Jun 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Three Modest Inquiries on the Aether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Three Modest Inquiries on the Aether
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Three Modest Inquiries on the Aether
  • From: Spaceman
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 13 Jun 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Desktop Continental Drift
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• The Emerging Mind Reith Lecture 2003 - BBC Broadcast
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Desktop Continental Drift
  • From: Florian
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ScienceNOW Daily News: The Ozone Layer's Unwelcome Return?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: ScienceNOW Daily News: The Ozone Layer's Unwelcome Return?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Re: Desktop Continental Drift
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Reduced helicopter landing load?
  • From: Androcles
• Desktop Continental Drift
  • From: Sam Wormley
• ScienceNOW Daily News: The Ozone Layer's Unwelcome Return?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Reduced helicopter landing load?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Is this a Thermal Imager?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Reduced helicopter landing load?
  • From: Androcles
• Hilbert subspaces and Unitary transformations
  • From: JohnF
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Reduced helicopter landing load?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Reduced helicopter landing load?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: is the EM field a complex vector ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: is the EM field a complex vector ?
  • From: broli
• Re: Is this a Thermal Imager?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Reduced helicopter landing load?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Gravity 268.1: More Re Malaysian Paper
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 268.1: More Re Malaysian Paper
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 268.0: Malaysia Quantum Minimization of Epstein Zeta Function Agrees With Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Optimization
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Reduced helicopter landing load?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: is the EM field a complex vector ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: Anon Email
• physicsworld.com newswire (Week 24)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum Gravity 267.0: Is Superluminality From c to 2c Causal-Reversed?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: is the EM field a complex vector ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Is this a Thermal Imager?
  • From: Gabby
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Reduced helicopter landing load?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: john
• Re: Reduced helicopter landing load?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: is the EM field a complex vector ?
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 267.1: Construction of a Causation-Reversed Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• is the EM field a complex vector ?
  • From: broli
• Re: is the EM field a complex vector ?
  • From: broli
• is the EM field a complex vector ?
  • From: broli
• Quantum Gravity 267.0: Is Superluminality From c to 2c Causal-Reversed?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Re: Three Modest Inquiries on the Aether
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Re: Reduced helicopter landing load?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: John Park
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does an antimatter apple fall up?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Wash your Clothes with a cup of water
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Reduced helicopter landing load?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Ino
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Size of the sun?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Light doesn't have gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: 3 dimensional curved space is the universal gravitational field
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Three Modest Inquiries on the Aether
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Reduced helicopter landing load?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• ITER will cost between 1.2 and 1.6 billion Euro more.....
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Reduced helicopter landing load?
  • From: Androcles
• Online Tutoring
  • From: helpfromtutors
• Re: Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Re: de broglie wave velocity
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Energy is the *amount* of mass in motion!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Reduced helicopter landing load?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: PD
• Reduced helicopter landing load?
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: AETHER: The Physicalists' God
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: Anon Email
• Re: 3 dimensional curved space is the universal gravitational field
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: 3 dimensional curved space is the universal gravitational field
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Getting power to a rotating table
  • From: Benj
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: dedanoe secured HEAVY HIPPY UNIFIED MEDAL on MAKINOVA FAIR OF INNOVATIOS
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Ah, that old chestestute of the uneducated, The Luminiferous Aerther.
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Re: 2634 Solutions manuals
  • From: Spammers deserve spam
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is a magnetic field "attached to" it's source?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• dedanoe secured HEAVY HIPPY UNIFIED MEDAL on MAKINOVA FAIR OF INNOVATIOS
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: David Hilbert's Explanation of Albert Einstein's Success
  • From: John Park
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Getting power to a rotating table
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Getting power to a rotating table
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Getting power to a rotating table
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: AETHER: The Physicalists' God
  • From: Florian
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: AETHER: The Physicalists' God
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Neil B.
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Uncle Al
• AETHER: The Physicalists' God
  • From: Laurent
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• The human bone decay clock is ignoring relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: PD
• Re: Energy is the *amount* of mass in motion!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: NASA mistook a bronchus for a spring coil of Mars Lander Phoenix
  • From: bz
• "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Ino
• NASA mistook a bronchus for a spring coil of Mars Lander Phoenix
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Cell phone popcorn
  • From: bz
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: bz
• This couldn't be spring coil of Phoenix Lander on Mars
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• 2634 Solutions manuals
  • From: BERGH
• Exciting Business Offer(Requirement of Franchise / Channel Partner in Pakistan).
  • From: Resea
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Physics of Cell phone popcorn
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Quantum Gravity 266.9: Western Canada and France Go Superluminal
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 266.8: Georgia USA Gets Superluminal Kerr-Newman Disk States
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Energy is the *amount* of mass in motion!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Energy is the *amount* of mass in motion!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Quantum Gravity 266.7: U. North Carolina Chapel Hill Now in My List of Top 16 USA Universities
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: bz
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum Gravity 266.7: U. North Carolina Chapel Hill Now in My List of Top 16 USA Universities
  • From: Namehere
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Quantum Gravity 266.7: U. North Carolina Chapel Hill Now in My List of Top 16 USA Universities
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Quantum Gravity 266.6: More Re North Carolina's and North Dakota's Entropy
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 266.5: U. North Carolina Chapel Hill and North Dakota State U. Revolutionize Entropy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Cell phone popcorn
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: a moron asks about quantum field theory...
  • From: Igor
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Igor
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: PD
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Androcles
• Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
  • From: paul707
• Re: a moron asks about quantum field theory...
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: bz
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: PD
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: bz
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: bz
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Energy is the *amount* of mass in motion!
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gasoline Per Barrel Of Oil ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: PD
• Re: Ed, you might like this, Bi-photons.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Ed, you might like this, Bi-photons.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Quantum Gravity 264.2: Sqrt(5) Key in Diophantine Approximation
  • From: Namehere
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Quantum Gravity 264.4: Heisenberg's and Einstein's Errors in Choosing Multiplication for Fundamental Laws of Universe in HUP and Special Relativity Respectively
  • From: Namehere
• Re: a moron asks about quantum field theory...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Proclus (411 - 485 AD) on time, "c", quanta, continuity, infinity, etc.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• It's a bronchi, not a spring coil of Phoenix Mars Lander
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Ed, you might like this, Bi-photons.
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: PD
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: broli
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: bz
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: bz
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: PD
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: PD
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Gasoline Per Barrel Of Oil ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Spinning ammonia molecule + inhomogeneous electric field.
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Gasoline Per Barrel Of Oil ?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Ino
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: calvin
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Energy is the *amount* of mass in motion!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: PD
• Gasoline Per Barrel Of Oil ?
  • From: Robert11
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: PD
• Re: Positron And Electron as Shown??
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Quantum Gravity 264.4: Heisenberg's and Einstein's Errors in Choosing Multiplication for Fundamental Laws of Universe in HUP and Special Relativity Respectively
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 264.4: Heisenberg's and Einstein's Errors in Choosing Multiplication for Fundamental Laws of Universe in HUP and Special Relativity Respectively
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 264.3: Why Summation (+/-, via Probable Correlation/Influence (PI)) is More Important Than Multiplication or Division in the Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Energy is the *amount* of mass in motion!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Energy is the *amount* of mass in motion!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Quantum Gravity 264.2: Sqrt(5) Key in Diophantine Approximation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 9 June 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: calvin
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: a moron asks about quantum field theory...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: a moron asks about differential operators...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: BURT
• Re: Positron And Electron as Shown??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• a moron asks about quantum field theory...
  • From: Edward Green
• a moron asks about differential operators...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Spinning ammonia molecule + inhomogeneous electric field.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: PD
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: PD
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: PD
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: bz
• Re: Energy is the *amount* of mass in motion!
  • From: BURT
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: calvin
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Energy is the *amount* of mass in motion!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: calvin
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: PD
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Uni
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Ino
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: PD
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: bz
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Energy is the *amount* of mass in motion!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Spinning ammonia molecule + inhomogeneous electric field.
  • From: bz
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: FTL question
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: If I only had a brain
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum Gravity 266.4: 266.3 refers to John Nash's "Nash Equilibrium," Nobel Laureate Whose Life Was Depicted in "A Beautiful Mind"
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: calvin
• Re: Conduction and the shape of electricity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Energy is the *amount* of mass in motion!
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Positron And Electron as Shown??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: bz
• Spinning ammonia molecule + inhomogeneous electric field.
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Phoenix Lander on Mars is burning glias in ovens.
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: PD
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: PD
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum Gravity 266.4: 266.3 refers to John Nash's "Nash Equilibrium," Nobel Laureate Whose Life Was Depicted in "A Beautiful Mind"
  • From: Namehere
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Life after death
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Proclus (411 - 485 AD) on time, "c", quanta, continuity, infinity, etc.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Proclus (411 - 485 AD) on time, "c", quanta, continuity, infinity, etc.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Jun 09, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Proving Bernoulli's equation without Calculus?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 266.4: 266.3 refers to John Nash's "Nash Equilibrium," Nobel Laureate Whose Life Was Depicted in "A Beautiful Mind"
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 266.3: Probable Causation/Influence Relates to Quantum Games Multiple Nash Equilibria
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 266.2: Belgium Furthers Theory of Superluminal Massive Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Proving Bernoulli's equation without Calculus?
  • From: fhussain44
• Angular Velocity.. derivation from rotation matrix
  • From: Sammuel
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: PLATES TECTONIC IS A FAST MOVING THEORIES INDEED
  • From: eBayer
• Quantum Gravity 266.1: In Probable Causation/Influence (PI), Inflation of Geometry Appears to Require Inflation of Matter/Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Quantum Gravity 266.0: The Riccati (Nonlinear) Differential Equation Related to the Ermakov 2nd Order Almost-Linear Differential Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Quantum Gravity 265.8: Using Fundamental Set to Choose an Accelerating Universe Model
  • From: OsherD
• Re: MHD spin water
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Igor
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• MHD spin water
  • From: Dale Henderson
• Re: s there an electrical device to split the workload between two plug outlets?
  • From: bz
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: new milky way model
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Phoenix Lander found more Martian brain tissue almost intact after 2.5 billion years
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: s there an electrical device to split the workload between two plug outlets?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: s there an electrical device to split the workload between two plug ?outlets?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: bz
• Re: s there an electrical device to split the workload between two plug outlets?
  • From: Androcles
• new milky way model
  • From: john
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: calvin
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• s there an electrical device to split the workload between two plug outlets?
  • From: 2.7182818284590...
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum Gravity 265.8: Using Fundamental Set to Choose an Accelerating Universe Model
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Quantum Gravity 265.9: Derivation of Current, Mass, Resistance, Inductance, Capacitance From Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Androcles
• A look at Earth from a different point of view
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Illusion is a wonderful thing
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Have the magnetic moment of a single electron ever been measured?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Have the magnetic moment of a single electron ever been measured?
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: PD
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: PD
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: calvin
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: bz
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Greg Neill
• Here it is again.. Twin paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: lasers to generate plasma in atmosphere
  • From: Agent Smith
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Agent Smith
• Re: Phoenix Lander found more Martian brain tissue almost intact after 2.5 billion years
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Phoenix Lander found more Martian brain tissue almost intact after 2.5 billion years
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Vanhasen erolla voi rikastua
  • From: Timo Järvinen
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Quantum Gravity 265.8: Using Fundamental Set to Choose an Accelerating Universe Model
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• puun palaminen
  • From: Sulo Ström
• Multi-particle entanglement in solid is a first
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Inovabrasil - 06_06_08 Indice PARCIAL (21 de 88 artigos postados)
  • From: Rogerio
• Re: Modest Inquiries on the Mechanical Properties of the Aether
  • From: Florian
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: What sort of worlds would permit Quantum Mechancis?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: John Andrews - water fuel [1916]
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY: THE UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS,CHEMISTRY,BIOLOGY, AND MATHEMATICS (pages 1-30 of 400)
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: calvin
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: calvin
• Re: Plane mirror
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: FTL question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: calvin
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• constraint on state functions and operators (quantum mechanics)
  • From: narutocanada@xxxxxxxxx
• What sort of worlds would permit Quantum Mechancis?
  • From: narutocanada@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A relativistic collision waiting to happen?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A relativistic collision waiting to happen?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A relativistic collision waiting to happen?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: calvin
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: A relativistic collision waiting to happen?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A relativistic collision waiting to happen?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A relativistic collision waiting to happen?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A relativistic collision waiting to happen?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A relativistic collision waiting to happen?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Phoenix Lander found obvious proof of Martian fossil
  • From: eBayer
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: calvin
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Science Earthquake Prediction
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: John Andrews - water fuel [1916]
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A relativistic collision waiting to happen?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A relativistic collision waiting to happen?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Phoenix Lander found obvious proof of Martian fossil
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: A relativistic collision waiting to happen?
  • From: PD
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: best scientist in the world in 2007 prize
  • From: PD
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: PD
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: PD
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: calvin
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Uni
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A relativistic collision waiting to happen?
  • From: Spaceman
• Phoenix Lander found obvious proof of Martian fossil
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Acceleration For A Car Going In A Circle ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Could universe be electrically charged?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: John Andrews - water fuel [1916]
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: FTL question
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Age Of Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Science Earthquake Prediction
  • From: Richter
• Quantum Gravity 265.7: Correlations, Masses, and Currents in Quantum, String, Twistor Theory
  • From: OsherD
• The Begining of Time - The Equation for Matter!
  • From: The Jackal
• Re: Modest Inquiries on the Mechanical Properties of the Aether
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Hawking doing commercials!
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Plane mirror
  • From: Will Janoschka
• Re: A relativistic collision waiting to happen?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Resonant frequency Earth
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Have the magnetic moment of a single electron ever been measured?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Four unmistakable glia remains found right under Phoenix
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: #1 book publishing by Archimedes Plutonium on the Internet
  • From: Plum Topper
• Does expansion predict a maximum redshift?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Martian dust fully labeled on NASA micrograph by Phoenix Lander
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: calvin
• Re: Have the magnetic moment of a single electron ever been measured?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 265.6: The Corresponding Theorem for P(A-->B) in Acceleration
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 265.6: Physical Interpretation of Last Inequality
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Four unmistakable glia remains found right under Phoenix
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Resonant frequency Earth
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: NoEinstein
• Quantum Gravity 265.5: Universe Accelerates (Correlation-wise) iff Dtt(x) + Dtt(z) < = 2Dtt(y) with x = P(A), y = P(AB), z = P(B)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 3 dimensional curved space is the universal gravitational field
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: 3 dimensional curved space is the universal gravitational field
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: lasers to generate plasma in atmosphere
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• A relativistic collision waiting to happen?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 6 Jun 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 6 Jun 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: "Space, Vacuum, and the Aether"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "Space, Vacuum, and the Aether"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Report on planned US participation in high energy physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "Space, Vacuum, and the Aether"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Modest Inquiries on the Mechanical Properties of the Aether
  • From: Florian
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: PD
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: srp2inc
• Hawking doing commercials!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: PD
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: Spaceman
• "Space, Vacuum, and the Aether"
  • From: Uni
• Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: Uni
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Resonant frequency Earth
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: PD
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: PD
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Resonant frequency Earth
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Resonant frequency Earth
  • From: Luke Stafford
• Re: Resonant frequency Earth
  • From: Luke Stafford
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Modest Inquiries on the Mechanical Properties of the Aether
  • From: Benj
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Modest Inquiries on the Mechanical Properties of the Aether
  • From: Benj
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: PD
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Modest Inquiries on the Mechanical Properties of the Aether
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Modest Inquiries on the Mechanical Properties of the Aether
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Resonant frequency Earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• physicsworld.com newswire (Week 23)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 265.4: More Regarding 265.3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Modest Inquiries on the Mechanical Properties of the Aether
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 265.4: More Regarding 265.3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Modest Inquiries on the Mechanical Properties of the Aether
  • From: Florian
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: 1 revolution per second.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: 1 revolution per second.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Modest Inquiries on the Mechanical Properties of the Aether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Have the magnetic moment of a single electron ever been measured?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Modest Inquiries on the Mechanical Properties of the Aether
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Modest Inquiries on the Mechanical Properties of the Aether
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Modest Inquiries on the Mechanical Properties of the Aether
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Perturbing the Schwarzschild metric
  • From: Androcles
• Re: radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Resonant frequency Earth
  • From: Dwib
• Quantum Gravity 265.3: Some Cases In Which P(A<-->B) Increases in the Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 265.2: Does P(A<-->B) (Probable Correlation) Increase or Decrease in the Universe?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: bz
• Re: Have the magnetic moment of a single electron ever been measured?
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: Resonant frequency Earth
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Have the magnetic moment of a single electron ever been measured?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Plane mirror
  • From: Uncle Al
• Resonant frequency Earth
  • From: Luke Stafford
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Perturbing the Schwarzschild metric
  • From: Graven Water
• Perturbing the Schwarzschild metric
  • From: Graven Water
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: 3 dimensional curved space is the universal gravitational field
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Have the magnetic moment of a single electron ever been measured?
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: Plane mirror
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: lasers to generate plasma in atmosphere
  • From: Androcles
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: lasers to generate plasma in atmosphere
  • From: jimp
• Re: lasers to generate plasma in atmosphere
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: lasers to generate plasma in atmosphere
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: lasers to generate plasma in atmosphere
  • From: zashi
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: lasers to generate plasma in atmosphere
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: lasers to generate plasma in atmosphere
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: lasers to generate plasma in atmosphere
  • From: zashi
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Plane mirror
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The Jews are desparate to derail Obama
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Acceleration For A Car Going In A Circle ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: lasers to generate plasma in atmosphere
  • From: Androcles
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Electricity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Plane mirror
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Things that can't be & can't exist
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: best scientist in the world in 2007 prize
  • From: robertmugabe
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: best scientist in the world in 2007 prize
  • From: robertmugabe
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light in a vacuum and other trivia
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• lasers to generate plasma in atmosphere
  • From: zashi
• Re: 1 revolution per second.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: Positron
• Re: radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: bz
• Re: radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: bz
• Re: The speed of light in a vacuum and other trivia
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: broli
• Re: Quantum Gravity 265.1: Is Probable Causation Increasing or Decreasing in the Universe?
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 265.1: Is Probable Causation Increasing or Decreasing in the Universe?
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 265.0: Chile and the Slightly Extended Fundamental Set in Warm-Chaplygin Inflationary Universe Model
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 264.1: More Re Brownian Repulsion
  • From: OsherD
• The speed of light in a vacuum and other trivia
  • From: Matt Giwer
• Quantum Gravity 264.1: More Re Brownian Repulsion
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: PD
• Quantum Gravity 264.0: Israel and U.K. (Cambridge) Pioneer in Brownian Entropic Repulsion Motion
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 262.7: More Re Intuition Behind P(A-->B) Intepretation of Universe's Expansion
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 262.7: More Re Intuition Behind P(A-->B) Intepretation of Universe's Expansion
  • From: Namehere
• Re: 1 revolution per second.
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How to expand Debye potentials of a plane wave into spherical harmonics?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: 1 revolution per second.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: 1 revolution per second.
  • From: Igor
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: best scientist in the world in 2007 prize
  • From: PD
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Help on Science Project (Reward: Laptop)
  • From: PD
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: PD
• Re: radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: oriel36
• Accelerating Electrons to the Speed of Light? (and possibly past)
  • From: Positron
• Re: 3 dimensional curved space is the universal gravitational field
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: 3 dimensional curved space is the universal gravitational field
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Help on Science Project (Reward: Laptop)
  • From: festusbyrne
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: PD
• best scientist in the world in 2007 prize
  • From: robertmugabe
• Re: radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: Dwib
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: oriel36
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: broli
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: broli
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Re: radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: bz
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: PD
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: FTL question
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: FTL question
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: FTL question
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: broli
• Re: radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: andy everett
• ORBITAL MOTION
  • From: ACE
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: PD
• r
  • From: justinlewis100@xxxxxxxxx
• radar cross section of a sphere
  • From: broli
• Coulomb excitation and Coulomb barrier?
  • From: Amine
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: Androcles
• Re: FTL question
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: FTL question
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Quantum Gravity 263.0: Entanglement Versus Resource Theory For Quantum Reference Frames: U.K. (Cambridge U.) and Canada (U. Calgary Alberta) Pioneer Again
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 263.0: Entanglement Versus Resource Theory For Quantum Reference Frames: U.K. (Cambridge U.) and Canada (U. Calgary Alberta) Pioneer Again
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 262.7: More Re Intuition Behind P(A-->B) Intepretation of Universe's Expansion
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 262.5: How Increases and Decreases of Variables in Physics and Especially Cosmology Relate To Sets Via Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How to expand Debye potentials of a plane wave into spherical harmonics?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• How to expand Debye potentials of a plane wave into spherical harmonics?
  • From: PuZHANG0702@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Solution Manual
  • From: pylox_5
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Eric Gisse
• 3 dimensional curved space is the universal gravitational field
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: hanson
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: kronecker
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Newton and the inverse square law
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Help on Science Project (Reward: Laptop)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Sean Carroll promoting their wrong and unscientific views again
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: powerball powerstation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Help on Science Project (Reward: Laptop)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: PD
• Re: Help on Science Project (Reward: Laptop)
  • From: Namehere
• Re: Quantum Gravity 262.5: How Increases and Decreases of Variables in Physics and Especially Cosmology Relate To Sets Via Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: Namehere
• Help on Science Project (Reward: Laptop)
  • From: Miege
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: PD
• Re: FTL question
  • From: PD
• Re: newtons laws
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: PD
• Re: Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: PD
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• powerball powerstation
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Re: 1 revolution per second.
  • From: PD
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: hanson
• Re: newtons laws
  • From: CWatters
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Quantum Gravity 262.6: Expansion-Contraction Come Directly From P(A-->B)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Quantum Gravity 262.5: How Increases and Decreases of Variables in Physics and Especially Cosmology Relate To Sets Via Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 1 revolution per second.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: Androcles
• A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Quantum Gravity 262.5: How Increases and Decreases of Variables in Physics and Especially Cosmology Relate To Sets Via Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: Namehere
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: kronecker
• 1 revolution per second.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: FTL question
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: FTL question
  • From: PD
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Full Nexus between Newtonian and Relativistic Mechanics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: Androcles
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Shell Theorem (gravity cancels inside a symmetric spherical shell) in non-Euclidean geometries
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Full Nexus between Newtonian and Relativistic Mechanics
  • From: gsardin
• Re: FTL question
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "Causality"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: hanson
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: PD
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Androcles
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: PD
• "Causality"
  • From: Uni
• Re: Calories burned question ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: TimR
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: Androcles
• newtons laws
  • From: brendanmenezes
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: kronecker
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Shell Theorem (gravity cancels inside a symmetric spherical shell) in non-Euclidean geometries
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum Gravity 262.5: How Increases and Decreases of Variables in Physics and Especially Cosmology Relate To Sets Via Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 262.5: How Increases and Decreases of Variables in Physics and Especially Cosmology Relate To Sets Via Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Interference pattern - textbook wrong?
  • From: Anon Email
• Re: Moon spinning away from earth
  • From: Anon Email
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Plane mirror
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Calories burned question ?
  • From: steviekm3
• Re: Shell Theorem (gravity cancels inside a symmetric spherical shell) in non-Euclidean geometries
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Shell Theorem (gravity cancels inside a symmetric spherical shell) in non-Euclidean geometries
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Shell Theorem (gravity cancels inside a symmetric spherical shell) in non-Euclidean geometries
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Things that can't be & can't exist
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Shell Theorem (gravity cancels inside a symmetric spherical shell) in non-Euclidean geometries
  • From: George Smith
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Things that can't be & can't exist
  • From: Huang
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: New Government Report Tackles Global Warming Effects
  • From: Benj
• Re: Things that can't be & can't exist
  • From: Plum Topper
• Re: FTL question
  • From: PD
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Things that can't be & can't exist
  • From: prk via NatScience.com
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Wood's metal and styrofoam
  • From: Matt Giwer
• Re: Wood's metal and styrofoam
  • From: Matt Giwer
• Re: A question on relativity.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: PD
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: A question on relativity.
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: FTL question
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Plane mirror
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A question on relativity.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: New Government Report Tackles Global Warming Effects
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Calories burned question ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Calories burned question ?
  • From: steviekm3
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: FTL question
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Calories burned question ?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Plane mirror
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Acceleration For A Car Going In A Circle ?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Acceleration For A Car Going In A Circle ?
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Plane mirror
  • From: Harry
• Re: Plane mirror
  • From: PD
• Re: Plane mirror
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A question on relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: A question on relativity.
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: Hey, Obama -this is an election, not a Madonna Concert !
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Plane mirror
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Plane mirror
  • From: Harry
• Re: A question on relativity.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A question on relativity.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: Impact Parameter
  • From: giovanni
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: A question on relativity.
  • From: Saysero
• Re: A question on relativity.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: A question on relativity.
  • From: Saysero
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A question on relativity.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• A question on relativity.
  • From: Saysero
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: barley a physics, hot days during summer....
  • From: CWatters
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Calories burned question ?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Calories burned question ?
  • From: steviekm3
• New Government Report Tackles Global Warming Effects
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: Jakob Nielsen
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: barley a physics, hot days during summer....
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Phoenix's photo shows unmistakable nerve cell,blood vessel, etc.
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: Jakob Nielsen
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: Androcles
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: The future of the universe: More and more distance
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: FTL question
  • From: PD
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Rolf
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 262.2: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Picture of Universe as a "Substance"
  • From: gernic
• Re: barley a physics, hot days during summer....
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: PD
• Re: Best Scientists in World.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Uni
• Discovered: another mummified Martian skull with clear facial features
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Calories burned question ?
  • From: steviekm3
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Physiology Question.
  • From: jmfbah
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: Jakob Nielsen
• barley a physics, hot days during summer....
  • From: Thomas
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: Androcles
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: Androcles
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Jun 02, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: Androcles
• Re: illustration about the em-field
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: hanson
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: Jakob Nielsen
• Re: FTL question
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Quantum Gravity 262.4: Is Mass or Matter "Dying Causation"?
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 262.3: Are Space, Mass, Energy in (Probable) Causation or in Time?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: kronecker
• Quantum Gravity 262.2: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Picture of Universe as a "Substance"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: hanson
• Quantum Gravity 262.1: The Universe as a "Substance"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: Artfishlintlgenz
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: hanson
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: Jakob Nielsen
• FTL question
  • From: Bernie Kovack
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Living in a black hole, what should I bring?
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: hanson
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light at Gamma One
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The Jews are desparate to derail Obama
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Jews are desparate to derail Obama
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Jews are desparate to derail Obama
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Quantum Gravity 262.0: Chicago, Maryland, CalTech, Florida Either Restore Ether or Approximate Space = Mass/Energy
  • From: BURT
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: rick_sobie
• Quantum Gravity 262.0: Chicago, Maryland, CalTech, Florida Either Restore Ether or Approximate Space = Mass/Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: emr and matter are linked orthogonal rotations of energy in 1:1 and 1:2 ratios respectively
  • From: mitch . nicolas . raemsch
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Androcles
• Science Scientists and Scientism
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Hydrodynamics
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: Kenneth Doyle
• Re: The Jews are desparate to derail Obama
  • From: Artfishlintlgenz
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.91: Carroll on Entropy
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: john
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: Jakob Nielsen
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.91: Carroll on Entropy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Hydrogen explosion pressure?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Hydrogen explosion pressure?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.91: Carroll on Entropy
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Light at Gamma One
  • From: BURT
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: BURT
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.91: Carroll on Entropy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Jews are desparate to derail Obama
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.91: Carroll on Entropy
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.91: Carroll on Entropy
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.91: Carroll on Entropy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Is Length Contraction Physically Real??
  • From: PD
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The Jews are desparate to derail Obama
  • From: hanson
• Re: The Jews are desparate to derail Obama
  • From: hanson
• Re: The Jews are desparate to derail Obama
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.91: Carroll on Entropy
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: guskz
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.91: Carroll on Entropy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.91: Carroll on Entropy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Hydrogen explosion pressure?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: The Jews are desparate to derail Obama
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Hydrogen explosion pressure?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.91: Carroll on Entropy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ESTIMATING MASS OF A UNIT PHO-TON PARTICLE
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.91: Carroll on Entropy
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.91: Carroll on Entropy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Hydrogen explosion pressure?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Hydrogen explosion pressure?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.91: Carroll on Entropy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A thought experiment... Is it possible tha the Walk for AIDS w...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Kro
• Re: Force from punch
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Jews are desparate to derail Obama
  • From: Artfishlintlgenz
• Re: The Jews are desparate to derail Obama
  • From: jmfbah
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• The Zeeman Effect. /My opinion/.
  • From: socratus
• Discovered: another mummified Martian skull with clear facial features
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: The Jews are desparate to derail Obama
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Force from punch
  • From: thomas . greenleaf
• Re: ESTIMATING MASS OF A UNIT PHO-TON PARTICLE
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: The Jews are desparate to derail Obama
  • From: hanson
• Re: Fair orbital question
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Hydrogen explosion pressure?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Jews are desparate to derail Obama
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: The Jews are desparate to derail Obama
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Hydrogen explosion pressure?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Hydrogen explosion pressure?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Hydrogen explosion pressure?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.91: Carroll on Entropy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.91: Carroll on Entropy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The Jews are desparate to derail Obama
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 259.91: Carroll on Entropy
  • From: Spaceman
• The Jews are desparate to derail Obama
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quantum Gravity 259.91: Carroll on Entropy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Hydrogen explosion pressure?
  • From: Spaceman
• Quantum Gravity 259.9: CalTech and U. Chicago and Scientific American via Sean M. Carroll Reveal (Arguably) How Entropy and Other Variables Can Be Misinterpreted
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: Huang
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: ESTIMATING MASS OF A UNIT PHO-TON PARTICLE
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Acceleration For A Car Going In A Circle ?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why does the topic of God appear on a physics board?
  • From: Agent Smith
• ESTIMATING MASS OF A UNIT PHO-TON PARTICLE
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Acceleration For A Car Going In A Circle ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Acceleration For A Car Going In A Circle ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Acceleration For A Car Going In A Circle ?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Acceleration For A Car Going In A Circle ?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Acceleration For A Car Going In A Circle ?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: What is Ether?
  • From: bz
• Re: Acceleration For A Car Going In A Circle ?
  • From: Spaceman
• get latest news
  • From: Banuchandar200
• Re: The absolute time clock (how to build)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Acceleration For A Car Going In A Circle ?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A SERIOUS flaw in Einstein's Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The future of the universe: More and more distance
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Acceleration For A Car Going In A Circle ?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Le Sage theory verses GR predictions
  • From: Aetherist