Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.

On Jun 1, 8:54 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

A NEW CONSTITUTION IS THE “CHANGE” THAT AMERICA NEEDS!

Yesterday, Barack Obama made one of his most impassioned speeches. He
was in Mitchell, SD, and he spoke in front of the world famous Corn
Palace. I’ve visited the Corn Palace, myself. I’ve also visited
Mount Rushmore. Because of highway construction, my arrival at Mount
Rushmore was delayed until dusk. But I got to take a time-exposure
photograph of the four Presidents—lit by LIGHTNING strikes! The photo
is blue, and it is gorgeous!

I admire the independence of the people in South Dakota. I certainly
admire those same qualities in the citizens of Montana—and throughout
America. From remote perspectives, it would be far better if the
decisions made in Washington would just maintain the stability we all
want. But, too often, bad laws and bad policies reach across the
miles to adversely affect us… wherever we live. Why can’t government
stop screwing things up?

Obama’s speech in Mitchell, SD, began with his oft-repeated
explanation of “why” he entered the presidential race at such a young
age. He continues to deny that he is selfishly motivated. Instead,
he talks like a man “chosen”—who’s the only one who cares about the
people. Seemly, if you will just elect Obama, he will go to
Washington and kick ***. But that ‘fighting attitude’ will doom his
chances. That’s because Congress, like Obama, is composed of mostly
egotistical and headstrong individuals who themselves went to
Washington to change things, but couldn’t. And they won’t let Obama
change things, either.

Obama regularly talks about how he hasn’t accepted any… PAC money. He
wrongly implies that there will be no one ‘pulling his strings’. But
with each new endorsement he received, Obama reveled. Perhaps he was
unaware that he was being bought. Obama often bragged that his
contributors have been mostly the low dollar givers. 90 plus percent
of Blacks are voting for Obama—“Come Hell or High Water!”… So, isn’t
it obvious that Obama has already been bought by that same voting
block, and others, to make decisions favorable to… them?

Obama got pushed into office as the Manchurian Candidate of the
Democratic Party leadership. Screaming Howard Dean knows that he,
himself, will never be President. But if a ‘weak’ (on experience)
candidate like Obama gets in, the party powers-that-be will get to use
him as their puppet to continue business as usual. On the other hand,
the Clintons are so knowledgeable concerning how the Executive Branch
should be run—From Day One!—that they won’t be needing the advice of
others.

An Obama presidency would surely be compromised because he has ZERO
executive experience. He would have to ask others how things should
be done. The Democratic Party leadership loves Obama’s inexperience!
They desperately want a weak President, whom they can control. But
folks, you can count on this: Hillary Clinton won’t be needing those
scoundrels at all!

Over a year ago, I learned that Barack Obama’s personality type is
wrong for a Chief Executive. An ideal President should be principled,
easy going, polite, diplomatic, and likable. Those qualities will
allow making the wise concessions needed at this important time in
America’s history. President Ronald Reagan exemplified those
qualities “Well…”! As I’ve mentioned before, I’m one of the top
graphologists in the world. Because of my talent for analyzing
handwriting, I can say—with confidence—that Hillary Clinton has those
same desirable personality qualities. But Barack Obama completely
lacks them!

It is most telling that the Obamas have just now decided to resign
from that “hate the USA” church of theirs. So, both of the Obamas are
lacking in moral judgment. For them, it has taken years to do what
most people would do in a heartbeat. Additionally, Obama has lacked
the moral judgment to insist that Hillary Clinton be treated fairly in
FL and MI. Far more hurtful to her than the robbing, this past
weekend, of half of her delegates in FL and MI, was the months of
delay by the DNC. That long delay allowed Obama to attract more of
his trademark “win at any cost” crowd… They have willingly kicked
dust in the face of democracy.

Obama’s crowd smiled in the same sick way that George Bush’s crooks
had smiled during the Florida vote-counting fiasco in the 2000
presidential election. If Obama had, immediately, been considerate to
those FL and MI voters—and to Clinton—he might have converted even me
to his side. But when I realized that the block-vote of the Blacks
for Obama didn’t care that he was morally weak, and would keep right
on voting for him, regardless, I knew that the USA would be in grave
danger… if Obama were to become President. Corruption in Washington
must STOP! Having a corrupt Barack Obama become President could well
be the final ‘straw that breaks the Camel’s back…’

In Mitchell, SD, Obama talked about his experiences during the SC
primary. In SC—which is my home state—he had promised a lady that he
would visit the city of Greenwood in order to gain her support. After
a one and a half hour drive in the rain, Obama met a “fired-up” local
politician. Apparently, that person’s mantra had the effect of
motivating Obama to try harder to win. Obama told the SD crowd that
the moral of his story was: “One person can make a difference in a
town, a state, a nation, and in the world.”

Coincidently, the latter is the EXACT reason that I have spent much of
the last twelve years of my life writing a New Constitution! Such
document will correct the glaring problems that our failed political
system can’t correct by itself. The corruption in government runs
much too deep. But IF the mostly good-at-heart American people will
disregard their group-against-group, party-against-party, and class-
against-class divisiveness, there are OPTIMUM solutions that can
benefit the vast majority—not just the tiny “winners” in the petty
issues of the moment.

I am 1/16 American Indian. Because of that connection, I am a closest
living relative of pioneer Daniel Boone. Boone fathered a child with
a Shawnee squaw while he was held captive by the Shawnee. That
exceptional child, Kaziah, was my great, great grandmother! So, if
anyone can sense my PASSION for doing what is right for America,
perhaps my bloodline is part of it!

Another of my relatives was the Major who was in charge of Fort
McHenry during the War of 1812. The British wanted to take back
America. Washington had already been burned. If Baltimore was taken,
the British were on their way to victory. But the wise Major urged
that an earthen fortress be built on the eastern side of the city.
And he ordered that a huge new American flag be commissioned. When
Baltimore Harbor filled with British ships, the Major—brevetted to the
rank of Lieutenant Colonel—got the soldiers out of the fort during the
bombardment that followed. The next morning, with there having been
few casualties, the Lt. Colonel ordered the men back into the fort.
They ran up that pristine flag and began blasting those ships out of
the harbor. Because of that Lt. Colonel—my relative—this country was
saved from the British, and our ‘Star Spangled Banner’ was written!

In the most positive light, please vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton for
President of the United States of America!

Respectfully submitted,

— NoEinstein —


On May 29, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

WARNING: THE USA IS POISED TO FAIL, UNLESS WE DEPART FROM OUR ERRANT
WAYS.

In this country, fartoomany people place more importance on
“winning” than on doing what is best.  The sporting events that
command our attention appeal to our primal instincts to fight for
survival.  But such mock fights—whether the players are collegiate or
professional—always have 50% losers.  Yet, the ‘rush’ of winning
continues to maintain our addictions to sports of all kinds… even to
‘Ballot Bowl’.

The Republicans and Democrats are, consistently, 50% losers.  Yet the
“love of the fight” has allowed those ‘quasi governments’ to squelch
the principles of democracy that our founding fathers hoped would
guide us on our journey as a nation.

When important national decisions need to be made,toooften we trust
and defer to our group leaders.  Those leaders tend to be highly
verbal people who enjoy participating in meetings of all kinds.  They
flourish in group settings—often getting their ‘rush’ in faction
against faction victories without ever accomplishing the objectives of
the members as a whole.  And they tend to be staid, older people, who
are less caring about the members’ fundamental objectives than they
are about maintaining their images of invincibility in group settings.

The Democratic Rules and Bylaws Committee members exemplify the above
personality model.  For their whole lives, most of those people have
been go-to-meeting types.  They revel in formalities, while being
morally BANKRUPT to do what is best for the members of the larger
group.  Yesterday’s decision by such committee—to punish the voters of
FL and MI for ‘violation’ of its unconstitutional rules—amounts to the
continuing RAPE of democracy.  Covering our eyes to such happenings
will surely bring down this nation of ours…   However, IF we will
start holding our leaders accountable for any of their actions which
aren’t in the best interest of the group—and not in the best interest
of the membership of us all in the human race—then, there might still
be HOPE for the survival of the USA!

Hillary Rodham Clinton is THE most qualified candidate for President.
She’s got a gregarious personality nottoodifferent from that of
Ronald Reagan.  Barack Obama, on the other hand, is a domineering,
egotistical man.  He’s a detail oriented loner who doesn’t work well
in, or with, groups.  Yet, that less-than-qualified man is being swept
along on the-team-must-win wave.  And BE DAMNED with the consequences
to the USA, as a whole, and to the human race.

In the 2000 election, the Supreme Court picked George Bush to be
President.  They did so because they placed more importance on the
traditions of ‘scheduling’ than they placed on democracy itself.
Eight years later, the DNC is placing more importance on its own
unconstitutional rules regarding the ‘scheduling’ of primaries than it
places on basic principles of democracy.  Can anyone not see how such
repeated corruption is placing the USA in peril?

A sad fact of political life in America is that office seekers must
try to appeal to a majority, while trying not to alienate the rest.
Clinton continues to give lip service to having a unified democratic
party.  For months, even though the race with Obama has been neck and
neck, the unprincipled supporters of Obama have kept insisting that it
is Clinton’s responsibility to “unify” the party.  Why hasn’t that
Manchurian Candidate, Barack Obama, dropped out—to unify the party
behind the most qualified candidate, Hillary Clinton?

Those who value “winning” above playing fair, cling to the delegate
count numbers as the “standard” for victory.  In the Electoral
College, those electors were conceived by the founding fathers as a
best-at-the-time APPROXIMATION of fair democracy.  But when modern
technology can allow holding political contests in a single day, and
counting the votes nearly that quickly, the rationale for continuing
to have the Electoral College just isn’t there any more.  Similarly,
the rationale for having… delegates for going to conventions to
‘represent’ the will of Democrats, just isn’t there anymore, if the
POPULAR VOTE of all of the Democrats in the USA can select the
candidate, directly—without even necessitating a convention!  Is this
country so steeped in tradition, that it favors… PROCESS above fair
democracy?

Any Democrat who doesn’t value the supremacy of the POPULAR vote above
the clearly outmoded delegate count is valuing “winning” above playing
fair—and above doing what is best for the USA, and for the human
race.  Many Democrats are reveling in the stampede-to-unity ‘numbers
victory’ that has been pending for so long for that featherweight,
Obama.  One of my own quotes: “Those who lust for POWER favor
wrongdoing, because the glory of doing the right things must be shared
with the moral imperative.”

It’s time that America starts doing the right things.  In the most
positive light, please vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton for President
of the United States of America!

Respectfully submitted,

— NoEinstein —





On May 26, 4:47 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

THOSE WHO BURY HEADS IN SAND WILL GET THEIR ASSES KICKED!

The corrupt news media looks at what its cohorts in crime are doing,
and says: I’m OK; you’re OK.  But the media is sick—really sick!  It
has no “corporate” moral judgment nor conscience.  Its motives: Fill
time or column space; get viewers or readers; make lots of advertising
money; and if anyone will listen, screw up democracy and any hope for
the long-term survival of the USA.

All of this will come to a head, soon, when the corrupt DNC ‘resolves’
the FL and MI primary issues by, it is hinted, giving the voters in
those states only half of the delegates that they deserve.  It seems—
from the Democratic Rules Committee’s perspective—that what it says
trumps democracy itself.  Where is it written in any document that
innocent voters can be ‘punished’ for decisions made by legislatures
controlled by the opposition party?

Another sick bit of rationale by some Democrats (mostly Obama
supporters) is that the “the UNITY of the Democratic Party” justifies
prodding super delegates to commit before the August convention.  Ever
since that Super Tuesday when Obama jumped into the lead, he and his
tribe of con artists have been bragging victory.  And they have been
promising everything—including the kitchen sink—to get “influential”
backers to perhaps swing delegates his way.

Nancy Peloci has endorsed Obama.  Her ‘high position’ demands that she
not… peddle influence.  But she is pretending objectivity by saying
that “the will of the people” counts, while she calls super delegates
to get the last (and the likely best) of those to commit for Obama.

Experience has shown that the corrupt people in Washington like being
on the winning side.  Those super delegates who haven’t committed
surely feel those same motives.  But Hillary Clinton is winning the
popular vote,   And she’s on the moral (good girl) side.  Clinton
hasn’t had the luxury to stampede delegates her way.  And she hasn’t
been the candidate spending the most money on advertising.  What’s her
‘reward’ for being the most qualified candidate by far?  She’s fair
game for all of those irresponsible types, like Jay Leno, who get to
poke fun for pay.  Stiff shirts like Wolf Blitzer do that more slyly
by “paraphrasing” every negative assessment about the numbers for
Hillary.  The “machine” at CNN, and the rest of those networks, is
corrupt from top to bottom.  A few good guys like Lu Dobbs… are
probably afraid to make any real protests, lest they be fired.  He is
just the “fair and balanced” that isn’t.

The “poll” that is most telling about Obama is the weight that he has
lost in the last week or so.  Apparently his heart is healthy, but his
motives for becoming President aren’t.  Barack is looking more like
the featherweight that he is.  How well would he fare on prison food,
I wonder?  Obama is at the top of the list of those who are more than
willing to kick dust in the face of democracy, if that dastardliness
can get him nominated.

Imagine, if you will, that my New Constitution now has the following
stipulation—subject of course, to being ratified by the people on,
say, the first Tuesday in November of 2010: “The will of the people is
the foundation of government.  So, Citizens’ votes shall have parity
without compromise.  Because principles of democracy shall reign
supreme in the USA, any civil or private person(s) who uses the
“authority” or influence of their job to actively or tacitly argue
against democracy shall be guilty of a crime.  Any person so acting,
beginning with the 2008 Democratic Party primaries, shall be held
culpable, retroactively.  Those found guilty can be punished up to and
including the death penalty.”

The citizens of Puerto Rico ‘get’ delegates, but not electors.  Why is
that?  For decades those people have desired to be made a state.  But
the corrupt powers-that-be in Washington don’t want a new “practical
thinking” state to, perhaps, interfere with the failed power
structures already in place.  My New Constitution leaves
‘controversial’ issues up to the direct vote of the People.  That way,
there are no clandestine influences to deny Puerto Rico their own
star.  The American Flag can be designed with the extra star.  I’m in
favor of it!

So, as Obama supporters (in the media or otherwise) keep taking pot
shots at Clinton, people like Nancy Peloci and Howard Dean should try

...

read more »- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

.