Re: FTL question
- From: PD <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 2, 3:19 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Timo A. Nieminen" <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:Pine.WNT.4.64.0806030602180.280@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Why not consider the case where you only have the tips of the pole. Take
two masses on the ends of a light rope, and swing them around your head.
Make it even simpler, and just consider one of the masses. What stops you
from swinging it around your head (on a very long, unbreakable, massless
string) until it's moving FTL?
Exactly the same thing that stops you from moving it at FTL in a stright
line - you need to have infinite kinetic energy.
You do not need infinite anything to get a finite answer of a speed.
If the answer of what speed it is doing is "186,000 mile per second".
No inifinities are needed for such a non infinite speed.
What's the kinetic energy of a rod of 1 kg whose tip is moving at
186.000 miles/second, James?
The only thing stopping it is the problems with what happens
to matter at that speed.
Nothing infinite about any of it.
:)
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FTL question
- From: Spaceman
- Re: FTL question
- References:
- FTL question
- From: Bernie Kovack
- Re: FTL question
- From: Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: FTL question
- From: Spaceman
- FTL question
- Prev by Date: Re: FTL question
- Next by Date: Re: FTL question
- Previous by thread: Re: FTL question
- Next by thread: Re: FTL question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|