Re: Science Scientists and Scientism

ANDRO!.. DID YOU HEAR WHAT KRONEY SAID
ABOUT YOUR QUESTION?... wow... WOW!

ahahahaha... Kroney, you are a good sport. You didn't
run away from the game... ... but talk to Andro. Not me!

Guys, guys don't answer my posts. Talk to each other.
You guys provide great cyber excitement.
You are good at it.
ahahaha... ahahahahanson

<kronecker@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d6661af0-f1a4-484e-a80a-8f4da1aefc68@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 4, 8:46 am, "hanson" <han...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<kronec...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:cca0e68a-5438-4246-a9ae-37d7fe694354@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"Androcles";
<Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<kronec...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in

hanson wrote:

Hey Kroney, I said this here
before:http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/da5adb5e0fea8855
and then the "you said -- he said" started with:

Kronecker wrote:

Have you, Andro, you just bs your way through life?
I am a professional .. blah, blah, blah....
Now be a good chap ...your mummy is calling you to tea..

Andro wrote:

Kronecker, I'll take on any day (until I'm bored).
*** off, Kroney, if you can't answer my question:

::: Why did Einstein say
::: the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
::: the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
::: the "time" each way is the same?

::: 1/2[tau(A)+tau(A')]= tau(B)
::: where
::: A = (0,0,0,t)
::: A' =(0,0,0,t+x'/(c-v) +x'/(c+v))
::: B = (x',0,0,t+x'/(c-v))
::: x' = x-vt
:::
Ref:http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img22.gif
::: "Easy: he did NOT say that." - cretin
harald.vanlintelButNotT...@xxxxxxx

hanson wrote:

Now, Kroney, after you have advertised your exquisite
qualifications, you really should answer Andro's question.
Else the game is ---[ Andro 1 : Kronecker 0 ]---
Come on "Now be a good chap"... never mind mummy...
... and of course, thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson

<kronecker@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
Doesn't matter WHY he said it. The experiments bare out what he said.
Goes against common sense for sure but that doesn't make it wrong.
Now the beauty of Science as opposed to religion is that you will be
given the opportunity to prove by experiment that he is wrong - and if
you are right then we accept your explanation. No such opportunity
with religion though...that's the difference.Now your point may be
that some Scientists are "blind" to new ideas. Well maybe, but you
need firm evidence to back up any claim and then people may well then
listen.
K.



.

Quantcast