Re: A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena

On Jun 3, 3:37 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 3, 12:16 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Here's the paper I've been working on, I just updated it today. You
may want to hit refresh on it.

I'll take in a little criticism, and then I'll try to publish it.

I think it has a nifty title, mostly stolen, so it must be good.

A Monadic Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Phenomena

    “A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its
opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its
opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is
familiar with it.” -Max Planck

    “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed..
Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-
evident.” -Arthur Schopenhauer

abstract:
The observation of Hubble redshift has been taken to indicate a new
physical property of space: that it expands. With the proposal of
expanding space, Hubble redshift seems to fit nicely in with the rest
of physics: the range of the electromagnetic force is infinite, the
speed of light is constant across all infinity, and energy is never
lost at any scale in the Universe. This paper begins to examine a
novel interpretation of Hubble redshift that is simply taboo in the
context of established physics. The new interpretation places limits
on the range of the EM force, the distance light can travel at
constant c, and the conservation of energy. While this new
interpretation of Hubble redshift leaves out the expansion of space,
it preserves the expansion of time in a photon's journey across
cosmological distances, and therefore should make the same predictions
as expansion cosmology if luminosity is calculated as a function of
time. The broader consequences of this new cosmology are proposed to
be an elegant method of understanding and modeling quantum and
relativistic phenomena, a single model that supersedes both quantum
mechanics and general relativity, and a resolution to the hard problem
of consciousness.

* Newton, I. (1867) Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica
* Einstein, A. (1920) Relativity: The Special and General Theory
* Heisenberg (1972) Physics and Beyond - Encounters and Conversations
Harper Torchbooks, p. 63
* Leibniz, G. W. (1714) Monadology
* Nakagomi, T. (1992). Quantum monadology: a world model to interpret
quantum mechanics and relativity. Open Syst. Inform. Dync. I, 355-378
* Smolin, L. and Barbour, J. B. (1992) Extremal variety as the
foundation of a cosmological quantum theory
* Cahill, R. T. (2003) Process Physics
* Smythies, J. (2003) Space, Time and Consciousness. Journal of
Consciousness Studies (Vol.10, No.3)
* Lanza, R. (2007) "A New Theory of the Universe", Spring 2007 The
American Scholar

Here's the link:

http://www.cloudmusiccompany.com/paper.htm

Mike, this is amazing, it is quite possibly the most elegantly formed
turd you have ever created. It is both sweeping in its claims, absent
of any evidence and flaccid in its argumentation. It is the most
ludicrous string of buzz words I have seen in a while. With a list of
references that have little or no effect on the scientific content of
the paper. Apparently all the posts over the last months have had no
effect. All I can say is WOW and ROFL...

For someone who fails to grasp the math of physics it is amazing that
you'd post this and think that it would be published. Not to mention
you may want to check your punctuation and grammar.

Oh just out of curiosity what part of consciousness did your paper
solve? And what role would a nuclear physicist play in your idea?

But don't let me stop you please submit it and embarrass yourself.

Cheers
.

Relevant Pages
Loading