Re: Fair orbital question
- From: "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:53:42 -0400
"Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EdKdnb_WO_pVJdPVnZ2dnUVZ_rLinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:484eb10f$0$25318$9a6e19ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That's silly. Think about it. If the seasonal
change is uniform, then you'll be swapping same
for same, with no resulting difference.
No swapping is necesary for seasonal change Greg,
even with no tilt, Earth would still have seasons,
but without the eliptical orbit, Earth would not.
Well, that's true enough. But they would be just
about opposite to what we have now (hottest during
our winter and coolest during our summer), and the
size of the variation would be miniscule, maybe a
couple of degrees average variation over the year
for a given location.
the tilt does "enhance it", but it is not the cause".
the orbit is the cause, the tilt is the enhancement.
Nope. The major component of the seasons is caused
by the tilt. Do the energy balance calculation, James.
Incorrect. The length of daylight hours and angle
of incidence of the sun's rays at any given place
on the plaent is an effect of the tilt.
nope,
that is the effect for the seasonal swap.
not the seasons themselves.
again, you need to remove the dang tilt and think
instead of just a "read only memory" use.
I've done both, James. That's what comes of reading to
understand rather than to entertain.
LOL
You have not checked it out enough without reading Greg.
LOL
Without the eliptical orbit the seasons would be gone
even with the tilt left.
Well, you're definitely wrong on this point, as the
calculations would show you. That you are of a fixed
mindset regarding it only highlights your characteristic
denial of inconvenient (to you) facts.
Hey James, why do suppose it is that people using
photovoltaic cells to produce elecricity take care
to aim their solar panels so that they are
perpendicular to the Sun's rays?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: oriel36
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fair orbital question
- References:
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: oriel36
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: calvin
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: calvin
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Fair orbital question
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fair orbital question
- Prev by Date: Re: Fair orbital question
- Next by Date: Re: Fair orbital question
- Previous by thread: Re: Fair orbital question
- Next by thread: Re: Fair orbital question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|