Ah, that old chestestute of the uneducated, The Luminiferous Aerther.
- From: "hhc314@xxxxxxxxx" <hhc314@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
Ok, here is where these rather silly and bizarre current concepts
actually origiate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_element
Here is a second.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phlogiston_theory
Now if you really believe in the Aether, here is still another
citation that you may want to read.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_ether
Now if you wish to discount all of this information, you are either an
idiot some somewho wishes to dwell in the age of 18th Century
folklore. So why continue to post idiotic fantasies in a science
newsgroup such as sci.physics, to the extent that they now vastly
outnumber posts on actual physics, posted by physics students and
actual physicists?
Same thing holds true for those that cannot grap Einsteins theory of
Special Relativity, which he explained in terms that even an 8th Grade
student can absorb. Now some of you crackpots like to dismiss this as
brainwashing, but still, can you make an accerator that operates at
high energies without making rest mass corrections as Einstein
specifically defined in his Special Theory of Relativity. In fact,
can you accomplish anything real with your deluded beliefs.
Crackpots who are either to lazy or dumb to acquire even an
introductory education in physics for whatever reason, but who
constantly posts their fantasy beliefs on pseudo-science here really
and truly do 'piss me off' but I have no ability to restrict them from
posting on a sci. newsgroup, when they would be far better suited to
post in an alt. newsgroup like alt.paranormal or some other newgroup
that attracts unstable, uneducated individuals and lunatics. Idiot.
For the idiots and crackpots posting such nonsense, don't you wonder
if the sort of posting that you do will ultimately catch up with you
on your job, unless you are instituationalize as some posters are.
Mean spirited I know, but after nearly 15 years on the net, I have
little sympathy to these idiots that destroy once serious newsgroups.
Harry C.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
- Next by Date: Re: Dark Energy: The 21st Century's Version of Ether
- Previous by thread: Re: Is a magnetic field "attached to" it's source?
- Next by thread: Reduced helicopter landing load?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
