Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein <noeinstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 21, 3:10 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
TIM RUSSERT PERSONIFIED WHAT’S WRONG ABOUT THE MEDIA.
Many would suppose that it is… the ‘American way’ to advance from a
lowly Washington reporter to have been one of the ‘most watched’
leaders of the media. But Tim Russert was about as anti-American as
they come. Yes, he used smiles to punctuate his trademark attacks on
the ‘weaknesses’ of his many guests. And he sometimes punctuated
those attacks with looks of cynicism. But, getting good Nelson
Ratings shouldn’t be the standard by which any media figure is judged.
While Russet’s star was just rising, I had the ‘inside scoop’ on
felonious acts committed by one of our most notorious US senators.
Sounds like… ‘news’, doesn’t it? But over several years—while I kept
trying to get my story out—I learned that the media is corrupt-to-the-
core. To wit: The media assumes that so-called ‘public figures’
aren’t required to live by the same standards of lawfulness as other
citizens.
Because Tim Russert seemed to be someone who ‘attacked’ his news
stories, I poured-my-heart-out to him in a letter that also included
pages of documentation copied on the old 3.5” floppy disks. But
Russert, nor any of the thirty or so other media ‘icons’ whom I
contacted would even consider that… ‘news’ might come from someone who
isn’t a celebrity. What gets covered as news in this country must
pass through layers of… editors, before some of it leaks through. It
is that same process—that eventually found Tim Russert at or near the
top of the media pecking order—that allows me to rightly peg Russert
as anti-American. The tacit role of the media is to inform the
Citizens. Tim failed to properly do so, because of his bias and
egotistical elitism.
The media is comforted by its united front. These days, there are no
maverick investigative reporters. I should know; I’ve looked high and
low! CNN contributor, Carl Bernstein, once made a splash by helping
to break Watergate. But he won’t make ‘a ripple’, now, to let it be
told that I have disproved Einstein’s theories of relativity. And
Bernstein isn’t interested in breaking a story—much more important
than Watergate ever was—that none of the twenty plus universities
which I have contacted care to correct the errors in their teaching
which the trusting public just assumes are error free. In effect, the
media is protecting the status quo both in government, and in
education. And that is why the media is the one ‘institution’ most
threatening to the survival of the USA. It is even MORE threatening
than all of our failed governments combined!
In addition to my seeking justice via the media for my injuries due to
that… US senator, I also tried to seek justice by contacting the likes
of Al Gore, while he was President of the Senate. And I contacted the
US Justice Department, and eventually, the Chief Justice of the US
Supreme Court. None of those, and dozens more like them, care to hold
any public figure accountable for felonious acts. Such a realization
is what prompted me to write a New Constitution. The primary purpose
of such is to kick out the rascals in Washington, a little at a time,
by restricting our representatives—other than our President and V.
Pres.—to those who have NEVER held any public office at the local,
state, or federal levels. Career politicians are verboten!
George W. Bush is a lame duck whose public esteem is about as low as
it can go. But to his credit, Bush is one of the best from-the-heart
speakers. The man has great speech writers. Even though the words he
expresses aren‘t always his own, his comments seem genuine—like he
cares. I admit that I don’t listen anytime that Bush talks about… his
war. His caring, there, is less than ideal. But if I could go hiking
or fishing with Bush, that would be something special.
Part of the reason George Bush ‘won’ in 2000 was because he got the
endorsement of that felonious US senator whom I’ve alluded to, above.
Bush praised that senator, even after I had written to Bush—as I did
to every state governor in the USA, apprising him, and all of them, of
the senator’s apt crime(s). Apparently, politicians, and the media,
are more than willing to look the other way to the wrongful acts of
public figures. They seem to know, intuitively, that their own
chances of escaping civil retribution for bad deeds goes way up if
they will only look-the-other-way to the wrongs done by public
figures.
After George W. Bush failed to act morally regarding that felonious
senator, I immediately wrote to Senator John McCain. I informed
McCain that he could easily win the Republican nomination if he would
just explain to the media that Bush had knowingly praised and embraced
a felonious senator. I don’t know what… ‘dirt’ the Republican party
had on McCain, but he passed up the last and the best hope he has ever
had to become President… and that was before the loss of much of his
mental wherewithal—which will prevent him from winning the present
presidential race.
I’ve had, perhaps, ’the scoop’ of the century regarding that senator.
And I’ve had the scientific achievement of the century by disproving
Einstein. Recently, I’ve begun to reveal details concerning my labor-
of-love New Constitution. Such has been inspired to correct our
nation’s problems, and in ways that will be most advantageous to the
American People. Incredibly, none of those things, or all three
combined, rises to the threshold of being even “fifteen minutes” of…
news, Because of our corrupt media, America is in big trouble—very big
trouble!
Tim Russert, and his ilk, got or get, personal enjoyment from making
others be uncomfortable, because of pointed questions or comments. A
real gentleman wouldn’t do that. There was something in Russet’s
‘value system’ that just wasn’t right. That’s why I listed him,
first, of those anti-democracy media figures who should face
retribution for their crimes. It has been said that Russert had
enthusiasm. But his enthusiasm was, quite simply, for doing the wrong
things in his job; doing things not in the best interest of the
country; and getting paid a huge salary to do so. Past ‘monetary
compensation’ won’t stand anyone in good stead at the Pearly Gates.
George Carlin, bless his soul, had more vision for how America should
be than any politician in Washington, or any media icon! The man
perceived truths! Very few people can do that so insightfully, for so
long, and with such fervor. His shoes will be very difficult ones to
fill.
The ruinous media keeps right on doing their 24/7 “nothings” that they
pass off as… news. Thinking Americans everywhere should wake up and
realize how hugely biased the media is toward the status quo. If any
of you are craving listening to talk, turn to the public radio and TV
stations. To begin to save the last hope for America: democracy, by
all means, STOP REPLYING TO ANY POLITICAL POLLSTERS! Don’t give the
ubiquitous media fools any ’scores’ to justify their commenting
regarding politics, or anything else, as in Ballot Bowl or etc.
Politics is NOT a game!
Hopefully, Barack Obama is the last of a long line of political two-
faces. He has never reached a high enough moral plateau to qualify to
be President. He didn’t treat Clinton with the respect that she
deserved; and he didn’t honor simple principles of democracy regarding
the FL and MI primaries. Those two things, and others, show that
Obama is unprincipled. He likes anything—corrupt or not—that improves
his chances of winning. People who think like that are the exact ones
my New Constitution will send packing. The main ‘changes’ that the
USA needs are as simple as straightening out the ‘quality of the
personnel’ that we hire to work for us in Washington, and in our local
and state governments.
Please know: “A New Constitution is the only ’change’ that we need!”
Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
On Jun 17, 8:28 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
THE POLLS ARE IN… AND THE POLLS DON’T LOOK GOOD.
The media has a ‘lock’ on what news the American people are allowed to
learn. The standard operating procedure regarding the ubiquitous news
commentary shows, is to plan them at least a day in advance. News
columnists get even more lag time. The purpose of the planning is to
assure that the overpaid, over-hyped, and otherwise clueless,
commentators and columnists always get to appear smooth and polished.
After all, those people are the ‘celebrities’ who attract the viewers
and readers. And if they can keep doing so—and nothing more—and the
people ‘upstairs’ will remain happy. These days, the media isn’t
about trivial things like the “news”. The media is about market
share, readership, and corporate profits. Its foundation is the
Almighty dollar, and any other motive be damned.
The media, its advertisers and investors are pro Big Business.
Anything which might shake up the status quo of Big Business is
actively, and/or tacitly, put down by the media. Heretofore, the
Republican Party has been considered the more pro business party.
That’s where most of businesses’ power was vested. But to be totally
powerful, Big Business gained control of the Democratic Party as
well. From the perspective of businesses, as long as a Republican or
a Democrat gets elected, they’re contented. In either case, it is
they who pull the strings, and it will be they who tell our government
officials “how high” to jump.
Regularly, I tell readers of my posts that the process of selecting
our President, and other officials, isn’t a game. Games are for
RECREATION. The future of the USA—and perhaps the survival of the
human race—could well depend on what our nation does. Nothing has a
more profound effect on how we are regarded, than our international
business relationships. Americans are largely oblivious to now
despise the USA is, in many third world countries. We are disliked,
in part, because our businesses regularly exploit the cheap labor in
such places. And those same businesses cause discontent, here, by
closing factories.
How could any nation be expected to think positively about America,
when we keep using our military might to protect our questionable
interests abroad? Unfortunately, doing bad things here at home, or
anywhere in the world, is placing us in danger of retribution through
terrorism or war.
Barack Obama continues to tout his lofty promise of “change”. Change
is the ultimate anti status quo. And that’s anti business. So,
Obama won’t be allowed to change things, much. His failure won’t be
in the “game” of winning. He keeps stacking the deck so that he will
“win”. His failure will come AFTER the “game” win—because of his
inability to correct the glaring problems.
America is in a loose-loose situation with Obama and McCain. If
either of those “win”, the business powers-that-be remain unaffected.
The latter have replaced the consensus of the American people to
direct our own course. Even so, every two or four years, we keep
going through the motions of trying to get our perennially failed
political processes to “change” things—but to no avail.
The media is a bastion of the status quo. The media gets to dwell on
the “game” of politics. Thereby, it holds sway on the outcome.
Public Opinion Polls are an important reason that happens. Polls are
the window on the current ‘score’ in the game of politics. Without
polls, there would be no “game”! My New Constitution will outlaw poll
taking regarding any upcoming election or referenda. Polls are an
anathema!
The one thing Americans can do, today, to help restore some semblance of democracy is to tell pollsters: “I will be expressing my opinions in the ballot booth. I won’t respond to political polls of any kind!” <<<
Ross Perot had the business expertise; the executive experience; and
the strong personal constitution to have been a President who could
change things. But the media and the pollsters wouldn’t let him have
a fair chance. With our nation facing the worst loose-loose situation
in its history, we need a third party candidate who isn’t controlled
by Big Business.
Congressman Ron Paul has the right ideas, and he sticks to his
principles. Congressman Dennis Kucinich has right ideas, and argues
them, vociferously. Having those two become President and Vice
President would be good for America! So, why are they cowering when
they are so needed? Obama wants to BUY the election with a billion
dollars in campaign ads. But that money would be better spent by
portioning it out to the jobless and the homeless! If one’s positions
on the issues, and one’s character, are well known, not one red cent
needs to be spent to get elected!
My New Constitution is poised and polished to solve most of the
problems that the voters can only “hope” the present candidates will
solve. When you want something done right, sometimes you yourself
need to do that thing. When our political processes are broken—and
they clearly are—the processes should be fixed! Political insiders
have had centuries to correct the problems, but they haven’t done so.
However, 75 plus percent of voters in the USA can ratify the New
Constitution, in just one voting day. And that will restore the power
to the People! It will make governments our SERVANTS, not our lords!
There are OPTIMUM solutions that will benefit most Americans. To find
such, we must stop sending officials to Washington to fight futile
group-against-group, party-against-party, and class-against-class
fights. Never again shall we allow elitist, career politicians to
tell us what to do. The USA isn’t our government; it is the PEOPLE!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
On Jun 11, 8:20 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
GORE UPSTAGES OBAMA.
Al Gore has finally played-his-hand by endorsing Barack Obama. Gore’s
well composed speech has to rate as one of his more impassioned ones.
But was the late date of its delivery chosen to maximize the impact
for Obama? Or was the late date chosen to highlight the oft-hinted
personal spite of Gore for the Clintons?
Gore’s endorsement speech kept mentioning how “important” elections
are. But what he should have said was: …how important FAIR elections
are. Eight years ago, Al Gore was the man who brought many democracy-
loving people, like me, to near tears. In the 2000 presidential race,
no tears had been shed by Republicans over the handling of the Florida
vote counts. Many Republicans actually rejoiced that the majority of
the US Supreme Court valued the scheduling of already slated events
above democracy itself. That’s like rejoicing when your team wins the
Super Bowl, because of bad officiating. Democracy got raped in 2000,
and democracy continues to be raped, now. Who should be rejoicing?
Numbers of times, Obama was shown on camera as he listened to Gore’s
endorsement speech. Obama looked like a smiling, limp rag which has
been squeezed-outtoomany times. The scene was Detroit—where auto
makers are closing plants. And the scene was… Michigan, where Obama
had been an active, or at least a tacit participant, in the rape of
democracy which so favored his candidacy. To become President, Obama
must win Michigan. That’s why the Gore endorsement campaign rally was
held in Detroit. From Obama’s perspective, surely, Michigan voters
will support for him—if he honors them by visiting. But to get their
support, Michigan voters must have short memories.
The Clinton years were good years for this country. Those facing hard
times can remember that fact. Many of the eighteen million votes for
Clinton were cast because of her experience; confidence for the job;
and because she symbolized the hope and promise of having better
times, again. Only by his rhetoric for “change” has Obama been able
to rally dissatisfied voters.
In less than a week after the final primaries, Hillary Clinton changed-
her-spots to endorse Obama,too. Though her supporters in Washington
cheered, that was another dark day for democracy. Perhaps out of
deference to me, Clinton promised that she “will be on the frontlines
of democracy!” Yet, for whatever reason, she is siding with Obama—who
values any democracy, or the rape thereof, which benefits him.
In his speech, Al Gore referred, erroneously, to “our great
democracy”. The USA is the biggest ‘pusher’ of democracy in the
world. But since the inception of our nation, this country has only
had a crude approximation of a democracy. Electors are apportioned
based on the erroneous assumption that the voter turn-out will match
the states’ relative populations. And that causes the votes in
different states to have different weight. A working democracy—such
as my New Constitution will instate—requires that votes be equally
weighted, well informed, and accurately counted. Those three things
should be understandable by all Americans. Yet, many cling to a hope—
in Barack Obama, no less—that our failed system of government can
magically make things right, if only we’ll elect Obama.
Hillary Clinton took two painful slaps to the face, yesterday. The
first was Obama’s announcement that the former Clinton campaign manager
—whom she herself had fired—would become the ‘press secretary’ for the
vice presidential nominee. So, Clinton is OUT as Vice President.
Now, some are wondering if Al Gore might be Obama’s choice. Gore is
certainly qualified to be President. But is his being pro environment
a strong enough justification for having anyone support Obama, whom
...
read more »- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- References:
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- Prev by Date: Re: The global population curve
- Next by Date: Quantum Gravity 272.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Versus The Paradox of Non-Conservation of Energy in GR
- Previous by thread: Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- Next by thread: Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|