Re: The standard of time and identical clocks

Sue... wrote:
On Jun 25, 5:23 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Explain how two identical clocks could have
different time rates show on them when they are brought
back together yet they still ticked at the same "physical" rate.

You don't know what "time" is so it would be a waste
of bandwidth.

Ah,
so you support multiple standards and causes that are circular.
figures.
I know you were just using irrelevant bull*** but I tagged along
anyway to see if you would even think about it.
but alas. You did not.
You need to keep your multiple standards to back up
your rubber ruler world.
Just like any other brainwashed relativist would have done.
:)


BTW... bandwidth is really cheap these days so
you can do some fairly simple maths to acertain
what others think your keystrokes are worth if
they have some concern about the bandwidth
used. ;-)

Do you really think "time changed rate" or do you think
at least one clock goofed up in it's supposed standard by a physical
cause that is being ignored?

See the Noether's theorem above. ^
Time changes rate when the looser of a drag race
crosses the finish line with less fuel than the winner
crosses with.

Nope.
That only means one dragster had a better
overall machine.


The standard has a problem if the clocks are not agreeing
on such a standard.
There is a physical problem with the clocks an it is:???

You are babbling about "time" and you can't even
define it in a physical context.

Time is not physical.
It is a counting method only.
It is 100% mathematical.


What can a bucket of water and a thermometer
tell us about "time's" symmetry partner "energy"?

It can tell me you like diversion tactics to keep
your house of cards that is based upon multiple standards
from being discovered.
:)

But,
You have not given physical cause for the clocks
to show different times.
You still only have the circular bull***.
time changed rate because time changed rate.
Tis truly sad.
and I thought you might actually get it, and start
looking for an actual physical cause.
but....My bad.
Why would a relativist ever knock down thier own church.
I should have known better for thinking you would.
:)

So Sue,
what time is really on Mars when you use all your rubber ruler
crap with the motion of mars over the years?
How far off is Mars time from ours now?
LOL

--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman




.

Quantcast