Re: Starships
- From: "Androcles" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 06:49:37 +0100
"Will Davis" <Will.Davis.2b46726@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Will.Davis.2b46726@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Ok thank you all that have replied to my post. Frankly I am really
| interested in the theory of space travel in the near future. The
| problems which you all have said I already knew, I'm trying to find
| solutions to such problems. For intance the problem of re-entry to
| Earth. Instead of having the ship come directly to the planet
| space-ports would be in orbit around the planet. Since there already is
| a space station in orbit then the next logic step as far as space goes
| is colonization of either the moon or general space. Then following
| that there would be the possiblity of interstellar travel hopefully.
| Thoughts?
When the LGM (little green men) find out that you haven't even colonised
Antarctica yet with its abundance of water, Earth-like gravity, perfect mix
of atmospheric gases, six months of glorious sunshine all summer long,
absolutely ideal conditions to support human life without even needing
a spacesuit, a whole damn continent still unexplored, they'll be having
a good laugh at your idiotic attempts at "the possib[i]lity of interstellar
travel hopefully" and promptly exterminate you for your disease. Stupidity
is contagious. Oops, I just caught some... forget I mentioned the LGM
and hand me back my sanity.
.
- References:
- Starships
- From: Will Davis
- Starships
- Prev by Date: Re: Aqua satellite data contradicts key AGW mechanism
- Next by Date: Quantum Gravity 276.0: Western Canada Finds Gravitational Geons in 1+1 Dimensions With Fundamental Set
- Previous by thread: Re: Starships
- Next by thread: Re: Starships
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
