Re: Paths against gravity and using gravity vs energy used
- From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 14:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 5, 3:40 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Two paths are created for going over a mountian.
One path (path D for direct route) is a straight line to the top
and a straight line to the bottom on the other side.
Another path (path C for curved) is a curved path to the top
and a curved path to the bottom on the other side.
The distance bewteen the start of the paths to the end of
them is the same and we can use a tunnel to prove such
of course.
So...
What path would need more final energy use to follow?
Your curved path just happens to coincide with my
orbit. I am not wasting fuel to decelerate and
negotiate your tunnel.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_of_mass
Sue...
:)
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Paths against gravity and using gravity vs energy used
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Paths against gravity and using gravity vs energy used
- References:
- Paths against gravity and using gravity vs energy used
- From: Spaceman
- Paths against gravity and using gravity vs energy used
- Prev by Date: Re: Paths against gravity and using gravity vs energy used
- Next by Date: Re: Newtons Corollary - Einsteins Postulat
- Previous by thread: Re: Paths against gravity and using gravity vs energy used
- Next by thread: Re: Paths against gravity and using gravity vs energy used
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|