Re: Paths against gravity and using gravity vs energy used
- From: "Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 11:36:33 -0400
Cwatters wrote:
"Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:QeKdnT5P34quQfLVnZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx wrote:> According to all know facts, a longer path will always take
more fuel (energy) than a shorter one would as long as the paths are
already there of course.
Not true. Drag is proportional to the square of velocity so a
constant speed route can take less energy than one that involves a
variable speed. Even if the constant speed route is longer. My reply
is irrelevant though because your problem is badly specified.
I am sorry, I meant to include if traveling at the same speed.
same speed longer path = more fuel than same speed shorter path.
.
- References:
- Paths against gravity and using gravity vs energy used
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Paths against gravity and using gravity vs energy used
- From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Paths against gravity and using gravity vs energy used
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Paths against gravity and using gravity vs energy used
- From: Cwatters
- Paths against gravity and using gravity vs energy used
- Prev by Date: Re: Paths against gravity and using gravity vs energy used
- Next by Date: Towards the grand unified theory: weak gas theory
- Previous by thread: Re: Paths against gravity and using gravity vs energy used
- Next by thread: Re: Paths against gravity and using gravity vs energy used
- Index(es):