Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"


"Marvin Barley" <mtodorov3_69@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:a8d531d3-04e2-4006-96e8-118ff9601938@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| On Jul 8, 5:44 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| > Dlo wrote:
| >
| > > "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
| >
| > [snip crap]
| >
| > Google Images (SafeSearch disabled)
| > goatse
| >
| > > E-mail:- einsteinh...@xxxxxxxx
| >
| > Idiot.
| >
| > --
| > Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
| > (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most
mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
|
| OH.
|
| So get an example.
|
| One twin travels near speed of light.


Relative to what? All velocities are relative :-)


| The other one remains staying.
| So the twin brother traveling near the speed of light ages more
| slowly.

Why did Einstein say
the speed of light from A to B is c-v,
the speed of light from B to A is c+v,
the "time" each way is the same?

Ref: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img22.gif

"Easy: he did NOT say that." - cretin harald.vanlintelButNotThis@xxxxxxx
According to moron van lintel, Einstein did not write the equation he wrote.

According to xxein:
It is an artefactual/superficially imposed yin-yang of sorts.

According to Lamenting Shubert:
Why do you want to know?


|
| Ooops. But there is relativity! There is no reference point in
| Universe!

Correct, so what is the speed of light relative to?

| Then: Which brother travels near the speed of light, and
| should age slower?

Yep... but you see, "time" (in quotation marks) is not time,
so the traveling brother ages "slower" but not slower.
Einstein was very careful to use quotation marks in his third postulate.

| So, there is no twin paradox, or the inertial systems aren't relative
| to each other at all?

Einstein was very careful NOT to say inertial.
In fact he said:
"If we assume that the result proved for a polygonal line is also valid
for a continuously curved line" so this inertial crap is a fake version
of relativity.






.

Relevant Pages

  • Unified Field, Special Relativity
    ... A Discussion of Special Relativity ... scientists will be found turning back to Einstein again ... requires one to violate the dictates of ‘simple common sense'. ... takes for the beam of light to travel from clock ‘a' to clock ‘b' (Tb- ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Unified Field, Special Relativity
    ... A Discussion of Special Relativity ... scientists will be found turning back to Einstein again ... requires one to violate the dictates of ‘simple common sense'. ... takes for the beam of light to travel from clock ‘a' to clock ‘b' (Tb- ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity
    ... quantisation of an energy matter neither along the nature, ... A Discussion of Special Relativity ... scientists will be found turning back to Einstein again ... takes for the beam of light to travel from clock 'a' to clock 'b' (Tb- ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
    ... "The Einstein Hoax", and its related texts, were written ... tenets on "Faith" since it/they cannot be proven, ... rigor on theoretical physicists as we do on Land Surveyors. ... General Relativity has allegedly replaced Newtonian ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?
    ... "The Einstein Hoax", and its related texts, were written because ... then insured the survival of that "Faith" by controlling what material that ... Unlike many, if not most, physicists, the writer is not foolish ... General Relativity has allegedly replaced Newtonian Gravitational ...
    (sci.physics)