Re: Google please assign this group a moderator

"Androcles" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote

Google please assign this group a moderator
-- someone to filter out Einstein's dingleberries.

hanson wrote:
ahahaha... AHAHAHHAHA!...AHAHAHAHHA... AHAHA....

-------------------
"Androcles" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
]news:Fk0dk.255827$1B6.87140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"hanson" <hanson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:LJXck.1116$al3.341@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
| "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:4872b4c6$0$26079$9a6e19ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >
| Noke wrote:
| ... GPS, etc. apply relativity.
| >
| "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| Wrong. GPS must use relativistic corrections or it
| would be terribly inaccurate.

"Androcles" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
AHAHAHAHAHA!
It IS terribly inaccurate. 90 feet above or below a runway
is not a good place to land... especially below. And where are
the calculations done? In the receiver.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/GPS/GPS.htm

Bob Clarke writes (on the problem of finding Longitude in sci.astro):
As far as I can tell, though, the
basic idea is to use the Moon as a clock. The Moon moves its own
diameter with respect to the background stars every hour or so, and
thus measuring an accurate lunar position gives the time. Combining
time with altitudes of stars gives longitude. There are second-order
corrections for "horizontal parallax," but the basic method should
work.

If Earth, like Mars, had two smaller moons instead one large one
how much easier would it be to locate latitude and longitude with
an astrolabe?
Or better yet, enough moons so that three or four could be seen
at all times instead of only when one is above the horizon?
Suppose we put a radio transmitter on every moon so that
we were not dependent on a visual sighting, but could "see"
right through cloud whenever we wanted to?
Suppose each moon could tell us where it was on that radio
signal so that we didn't need an astrolabe?
An even better improvement would be to have each moon
carry an accurate clock and tell us the exact time it was there
when it sent the radio transmission.
This would be sci-fi, of course... unless it was called GPS...

| GPS clocks are
| corrected to keep time with a chosen time system
| (which itself is corrected for local relativistic
| effects, too).

GPS clocks are corrected with GMT (the real British version of
the American imposter's UTC) just like every other fucking clock
including Cassini's. Amazingly, they are all "synchronized".
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/operations/saturn-time.cfm
That Greg Neill fella sure is a bullshitting fuckhead.

| >
| hanson wrote:
| Einstein Dingleberries like Noke and Neil are damaged
| goods who have fallen victim to Albert's REL-scam that
| makes them live in their unreal fantasy world:
| < http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/a2a290997bafd30c>
| wherein it says:
| " Where is Einstein referred to for his contributions in your link?
| < http://lbs.gpsworld.com/gpslbs/content/printContentPopup.jsp?id=481835 >
| Where does Nokia, Motorola, LG, Samsung, TRG, Garmin or
| TomTom say that they could not have achieved that level/success
| of technology were it not for Einstein and his SR and GR? "...
| No answer, [Sam] huh, how come?.... ahahahahaha...
| >
| http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/57ec86d591efba8c?hl=en
| wherein its says:
| GPS NEVER needed any SR nor GR! Not for its conception, not
| for its design, not for its development, not for its manufacture, not for
| its production, not for its testing, not for its operations and not for
its
| improvements.... ahahahaha... ONLY a few Einstein Dingleberries
| in academia invented **BELATEDLY, AFTER THE FACT**, some
| convoluted stories to describe GPS operations. .... BFD!... Any
| fool and writerling can tell a story about something that has already
| been built... and Einstein Dingleberries do take the cake in this...
| ... ahaha... AHAHAHA....
| >
| http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/7893092f38cf21e0?hl=en
| wherein it says: In this case here, any decent engineer, let alone
| physicist, can quickly see, in ONE FELL SWOOP, that all
| what matters in such an approximation is the mass of the earth,
| M_e, and the signal height traveled, h, to show in a single line that
| >
| [1] (M_e /h ) * (2 G/c^2) * 86400 = 38 microsec
| >
| the daily time drift, wherein M_e = the earth's mass, h = the orbit height
| over the surface, G = Newton, c = Lightspeed & the 86400 sec/day.
| >
| After a decade in operation it took Ashby & other Einstein
| Dingleberries, 39 equations to conjure up these same 38 usecs...
| ahahaha... They all tried, as jonnies-come-lately ... to get fame
| by association, .... ahahaha... and you sorry EDs suck up their
| *** with a religious fervor that is only seen in Islamist extremists
| who do defend their Koran.... ahahaha.... So, thanks for the laughs
| you New-Age Disciples... ahahaha.... ahahahahahahahanson
|
"Androcles" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote That Greg Neill dingleberry wants some of the limelight.
He wants us to believe he's one of the smart guys.
Little does he realize limelight was canned in favour of the laser.
Still, let him go on with his music hall jokes.
"Who was that lady I saw you with last night?"
"That was no lady, that was my wi-fi."

Google please assign this group a moderator --
someone to filter out Einstein's dingleberries.

hanson wrote:
ahahaha... AHAHAHHAHA!...AHAHAHAHHA... AHAHA....











.

Quantcast