Re: Does Relativity generate more heat than light?


"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:oMbgk.259903$yE1.91738@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Tom Potter wrote:
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:abb64f15-d1d1-4a8e-a085-4261cef90199@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 16, 9:49 pm, "Tom Potter" <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip repeated blather]

And of course on billion dollar programs
RESEARCHING things beyond man's capacity to EVER
experience in time and space,
like the beginning and end of the universe, black holes,
time travel, warping through space, etc.

-Name one project that has spent billions of dollars on any one of
-these.

You first Gisse.


Blustering Potter cant think of any projects. Awe too bad Potter.
Go back to standing under the horses ass.

I'm surprised that Gisse and Wormley
are ignorant of the Gravity Probe B project.

Excerpts from a couple of posts I made about Gravity Probe B
are listed below.

As I predicted on April 11, 2007
the results to be annouinced on April 15
would be "Yes Virginia, frame dragging MIGHT occur."

As can be seen, the General Relativity Welfare Mothers
announced that they would
"announce the final results of the experiment in December 2007".

What were the "final results"?
Have they proven or disproven GTR,
or will they try to con the taxpayers out of a few billion
more dollars for "Gravity Probe C"?

Quote
======================
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Gravity Probe B results
Date: 15 Apr 2007 05:36:14 -0700

As I posted on 11 April 2007 Wednesday 5:06 PM,
=======================================
"as can be seen by the recent news,
over one billion of the tax payers dollars have been spent
on just one of the many projects to rationalize General Relativity
( Gravity Probe-B ).

Papers on the General Relativity experiment will be forthcoming
in a few days, and maybe, just maybe,
the scientists on the taxpayer dole,
who promoted this project will make the astounding announcement
that "Yes Virginia, frame dragging MIGHT occur."
===============================================

Here is the report on the Gravity Probe B frame dragging experiment
which was released today 4/15/2007.

http://einstein.stanford.edu/

"The other effect, called frame-dragging, is the amount by which the
rotating Earth drags local space-time around with it. According to
Einstein's theory, over the course of a year, the geodetic warping of
Earth's local space-time causes the spin axes of each gyroscope to
shift from its initial alignment by a minuscule angle of 6.606 arc-
seconds (0.0018 degrees) in the plane of the spacecraft's orbit.
Likewise, the twisting of Earth's local space-time causes the spin
axis to shift by an even smaller angle of 0.039 arc-seconds (0.000011
degrees) - about the width of a human hair viewed from a quarter mile
away - in the plane of the Earth's equator. GP-B Scientists expect to
announce the final results of the experiment in December 2007,
following eight months of further data analysis and refinement.
<Data has been on file for two years, and although over one billion
dollars has been spent on this particular rationalization of General
Relativity, they need at least eight more months to <cook the books?>

==============
End quote

As can be seen at the web site below,
NASA took my advice and
Gravity Probe B came last in the NASA review
so the panel recommended cutting funding of the project.

Since Bush and the NeoCons destroyed America's economy
and America's standing in the world community,

American taxpayers can no longer afford the luxury of
funding billion dollar programs to glorify models
hyped by particular races and religions for their glorification.

http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/34284

--
Tom Potter

http://www.geocities.com/tdp1001/index.html
http://notsocrazyideas.blogspot.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tdp1001.wiki.zoho.com
http://groups.msn.com/PotterPhotos
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/dingleberry.htm

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?" [Gravity Probe B tests Einsteins General Relativity]
    ... Quote: "... ... Why after almost eighty years do we still need to test Einstein's theory of general relativity? ... The redshift has been confirmed -- notably in the elegant NASA program Gravity Probe A. The perihelion data have been strengthened, and supplemented by evidence from an astrophysical object, the Taylor-Hulse binary pulsar. ... Gravity Probe B is designed to reveal -- and check with high precision -- two extraordinary consequences of general relativity, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Gravity Probe C
    ... the General Relativity Welfare Mothers ... more dollars for "Gravity Probe C"? ... GP-B Scientists expect to ... when it allowed hundreds of thousands of theorists into America, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
    ... magnetic and electric effects, windage, etc. ... Excerpts from a couple of posts I made about Gravity Probe B ... the General Relativity Welfare Mothers ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Gravity Probe B comes last in NASA review
    ... Panel recommendation is to cut funding of mission by Septemberhttp://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/34284 ... the General Relativity Welfare Mothers ... Have they proven or disproven GTR, or will they try to con the taxpayers out of a few billion more dollars for "Gravity Probe C"? ... Earth's local space-time causes the spin axes of each gyroscope to ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Does Relativity generate more heat than light?
    ... time travel, warping through space, etc. ... Excerpts from a couple of posts I made about Gravity Probe B ... the General Relativity Welfare Mothers ...
    (sci.physics)