Re: Why is Relativity constantly under attack?


"Ian Parker" <ianparker2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:18986040-8683-421c-aca5-fc40c44e4c3a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 18 Jul, 20:16, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 18, 8:54 am, Jeff$B"%(BRelf <Jeff_R...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On occasion, I read what you post to Sci.Physics,
including your 33 most recent posts.

I see you dwelling on what you don't like
( to wit: non-textbook physics ) to the exclusion of what you do like:
textbook physics. Everyone But You knows that.

For what value of "everyone" ?

The vast, vast majority of what interests me is not printed in any
textbooks. What is printed in textbooks is either only the basics or
horribly outdated.

It takes time for current concepts to be taught as bob standard.
Relativity can be classed, now at any rate, as bog standard. The fact
that the thread was renamed is to me indicative of something. Next
time I change it it we be changed to

" The Black Sun and Aldebaran [khayyid?]"

That to me can be the only reason for this sniping. You see when
people accept a theory that is experimentally confirmed there is no
neeed to impute motives, they are following scientific method. The
criticism, both in type and volume, of Relativity suggests strong
ulterior motives.

Ian Parker makes a good point when he
points out that unscrupulous people
con the masses into accepting models
in order to promote their selfish agendas.

For example, Aztec priests conned the public
into accepting their model that if they
ripped out the hearts of people,
that the sun would come up in the morning.

Jews conned the public into accepting
much of their religious model.

Freud conned the masses into accepting
his doped up, sexed up perception of
how the mind works.

Marx and Engel conned some of the masses
into accepting class warfare.

The America NeoCons conned Bush
and some Americans into accepting religious warfare.

The best measure of a model is its' utility
in a few and open market,
not how it pits one class against another,
one religion against another,
one race against another.

For example, rational, intelligent folks
who want to learn how to judge the value of models
should compare the General Relativity model
with the DNA model.

Note that although General Relativity has been
enormously hyped for one hundred years,
and Einstein was made Time Magazine's
"Man of the Century" and the masses
were conned into thinking that he was the
most intelligent man who ever lived,

that Einstein's model is a Tower of Babel
that wastes time, money and minds
on such pursuits as time travel, warping through space,
the beginning and end of the universe, worm holes, etc.

whereas the DNA model is used every day to
improve health, create better crops, create better live stock,
fight crime, reconstruct history, etc.

Thanks Ian for pointing out that the enormous hype of
"Relativity suggests strong ulterior motives."

I suggest that this "ulterior motive"
is to portray Jews as intelligent, virtuous victims
rather than a criminal gang that has come into conflict
with all of their neighbors throughout history.

Your pal,

--
Tom Potter

http://www.geocities.com/tdp1001/index.html
http://notsocrazyideas.blogspot.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tdp1001.wiki.zoho.com
http://groups.msn.com/PotterPhotos
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/dingleberry.htm





.

Relevant Pages