Re: Why is Relativity constantly under attack?
- From: "Tom Potter" <tdp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:39:22 +0800
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:xrngk.260678$yE1.221541@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Tom Potter wrote:
The best measure of a model is its' utility
in a few and open market...
Na, You're wrong Potter, the measure of a scientific model
is in the data agreeing with the models predictions. For
example, there predictions of Special and general relativity
have never been contradicted, but confirmed, by observations.
Newton's gravitational theory didn't explain what gravitation
is but does provide reasonable accuracy for calculations.
GTR provides a more complete understanding of gravitation
and is more accurate than Newton... orbital precession,
gravitational lensing, etc. and yes, GTR predicts accurately
the corrections necessary for Global Navigation Satellite
Systems (GNSS).
You've got to admit, Potter, that GPS have proved to be quite
the utility for the world... generating tens of billions of
dollars of economic and utilitarian benefit to the peoples
of this world. Both the quantum mechanics and general relativity
have made that possible. :-)
GTR is an essential tool in investigations of compact
astronomical objects... binary pulsars, supernovae, quasars,
supermassive black holes, galactic evolution and galactic
cluster evolution... Dark Matter distribution and cosmology.
And so on!
Sammy makes a good point!
"GTR is an essential tool"
if you want to model things beyond man's capacity
to ever experience in time and space such as
"binary pulsars, supernovae, quasars,
supermassive black holes, galactic evolution and galactic
cluster evolution... Dark Matter distribution and cosmology.
And so on!" ( Time travel, warping through space, worm holes,
the beginning and end of the universe,
the mind of God, etc.)
Of course, Sammy makes a bad point
when he parrots the lie
that General relativity was and is
essential to the GPS System.
Shame on you Sammy!!!
--
Tom Potter
http://www.geocities.com/tdp1001/index.html
http://notsocrazyideas.blogspot.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tdp1001.wiki.zoho.com
http://groups.msn.com/PotterPhotos
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/dingleberry.htm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is Relativity constantly under attack?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Why is Relativity constantly under attack?
- References:
- Re: Does Relativity generate more heat than light?
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Does Relativity generate more heat than light?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Does Relativity generate more heat than light?
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Does Relativity generate more heat than light?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Dwelling on stuff you don't like.
- From: Jeff▲Relf
- Re: Dwelling on stuff you don't like.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Eric Gisse dwells on non-textbook physics, not textbook physics.
- From: Jeff▲Relf
- Re: Eric Gisse dwells on non-textbook physics, not textbook physics.
- From: Eric Gisse
- Why is Relativity constantly under attack?
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Why is Relativity constantly under attack?
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Why is Relativity constantly under attack?
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Does Relativity generate more heat than light?
- Prev by Date: Re: Magnetic field transmitters and receivers.
- Next by Date: Re: Why is Relativity constantly under attack?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is Relativity constantly under attack?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is Relativity constantly under attack?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|