Re: Why is Relativity constantly under attack?

"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7fcad7d8-d7ae-44b6-a859-6c48679784bf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Tom Potter" <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tom Potter wrote:

Tom Potter wrote:
The best measure of a model is its' utility
in a few and open market...

"Sam Wormley" <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Na, You're wrong Potter, the measure of a scientific model
is in the data agreeing with the models predictions.

hanson wrote:
That's typical teacher talk which is good for the class room
but totally useless, with NO "utility in a few and open market"
as can be seen in the real world, like here, where Einstein's
crap is still used and where they laugh about it:
= mil/indust. Eng, R&D....................."does not need REL ***"
= *.edu and grantology ...................."does use REL, No ***"
= Promo, Sales & Movies..............."loves REL by the shitload"
= Jews defend it as cultural heritage whether "REL is *** or not".

Tom Potter wrote:
Of course, Sammy makes a bad point
when he parrots the lie
that General relativity was and is
essential to the GPS System.

High school graduate "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
Why do you continue to lie, crackpotter?
http://www.leapsecond.com/history/Ashby-Relativity.htm

hanson wrote:
..... hahahaha... It's your mind that is cracked, Eric. You bought
into the pathetic Ashby ***, published a decade AFTER GPS
was in operation, wherein it takes that Einstein Dingleberry A.
39 equations to arrive the "infamous" 38us delay, when every
highs school graduate can immediately see, with one look, in
ONE FELL SWOOP, that this situation simply follow the edict
of classical mechanics
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/7893092f38cf21e0?hl=en
wherein it says "all what matters in such an approximation is the
mass of the earth, M_e, and the signal height traveled, h, to show
in a single line that

(M_e /h ) * (2 G/c^2) * 86400 = 38 microsec

the daily time drift, wherein M_e = the earth's mass, h = the orbit
height over the surface, G = Newton, c = Lightspeed & the 86400
sec/day.
To boot all that Ashby REL crap is outdated anyway because
newer GPS versions operate on triangulation which has been
posted about extensively by Androcles, who has worked for
many years in that field... Why do you continue to believe and
proselitize old useless crap, Eric?... Get with the program.

High school graduate "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/gps/geninfo/IS-GPS-200D.pdf
Its' right there in the spec.
Again - why do you continue to lie, Potter?

hanson wrote:
Either you'll end up as a "science" teacher for the geriatric
crowd like Sam is, where you can continue to "lie" about the
value of Einstein's crap... ahahahaha... ahahahaha... or ...
.... because the best you can hope for, Eric, when you finally
advance from being a HSG to a BSc, is that you'll find a job
as tech. writer, writing specifications... which are all done
AFTER a system has been designed, produced and is in
operation... ahahahaha....

Heed Potter's and Androcles' advice... Be careful with what
your teacher types are stuffing into tour mind... It only works in
the class room but it is 100% useless for you to put bred and
butter on your table... If you don't believe that then you WILL be
"sorry", like you anticipated to be and so said yourself in
another post.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/9aabe13ab71a49b5?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3fe4d2c97bda10b1?hl=en
Take heed Eric & thanks for the laughs... ahahaha... ahahnson





.

Quantcast