Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- From: "Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:45:42 -0400
Greg Neill wrote:
"Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:zaudnfRJT4xcaxjVnZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx
If you would think about it without ignoring
relative mass and kinetic energy differences,
You might understand that it does work.
While you're explaining the difference in motion that
a large mass in motion makes (we are eager to hear),
you might take a moment to explain what "relative mass"
is in your version of Newtonian physics.
Oh Greg,
I am not going to go over classical physic with you,
You are too brainwashed by your rubber rulers to
think about such classical thought without it interfering
with your religion.
It seems you do not get kinetic energy and the reasons
that a mass in motion with a higher velocity will transfer
more force than the same mass with a lower velocity.
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- References:
- Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- From: Greg Neill
- Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- Prev by Date: Re: Some propellantless propulsion fun
- Next by Date: Re: Some propellantless propulsion fun
- Previous by thread: Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- Next by thread: Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading