Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- From: "Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:37:08 -0400
Greg Neill wrote:
The accounting balances. A lower force over a longer
time trasnfers the same amount of momentum as a
larger force over a shorter time. The momentum
transfered, for a constant force, is F*dt.
So you still refuse to acount for the KE increase of
the larger mass.
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- References:
- Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- From: Greg Neill
- Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- Prev by Date: Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- Next by Date: Re: The opposing rockets and the box
- Previous by thread: Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- Next by thread: Re: Propellantless propulsion fun 3 (recirculative propelant)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
