Re: Some propellantless propulsion fun

Greg Neill wrote:
"Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:teGdnUwuOIN2txvVnZ2dnUVZ_rjinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx
Greg Neill wrote:
Typical. Whenever you begin to get pinned down on the
actual details of one of your little gedanken experiments
you start shouting about diversions. If you'd just state
the problem clearly and succinctly to being with you
save hours of pointless clarification (followed by
muddying then inevitably abandonment) of the problem.

I gave the complete details about the original post,


Original post missing information:
1. How the ball is accelerated.

This alone shows you are a twisting diversion moron or worse.
The original post here Greg had no "ball" at all.
It had a piston and tube and magnets.
sheesh
You truly are a dingleberry stage one.
LOL

--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Some propellantless propulsion fun
    ... you start shouting about diversions. ... I gave the complete details about the original post, ... The original post here Greg had no "ball" at all. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Some propellantless propulsion fun
    ... you start shouting about diversions. ... I gave the complete details about the original post, ... The original post here Greg had no "ball" at all. ...
    (sci.physics)