Re: The clock malfunctioned.

On Jul 24, 2:31 pm, srp2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 24 juil, 15:01, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Jul 24, 10:57 am, srp2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On 23 juil, 01:18, "Spaceman" <space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

If 2 clocks show different times.
At least one clock malfunctioned in it's proper
counting rate.

Clocks are nothing more that "periodic counting machines".
When a clock does not "count" at the same
rate as another clock, at least one lost it's proper
counting rate.

Only relativist fools can not grasp such a simple fact
that has been known about clocks for centuries.
:)

The real problem really is that rate difference between ground
based atomic clocks and altitude based similar clocks is taken
as ultimate proof of time dilation

Well, THAT'S certainly not true. There's oodles of evidence of time
dilation that don't involve clocks up in the air at all. I don't know
where you get the idea that the whole thing depends on one experiment.

How vaguer and informationless can one get !

Ok. Out with your extended knowledge on the matter.

What other experiment was carried out, not involving atomic clocks
and not based on atomic clocks, confirms so-called time dilation ?

Lots of them:
1. Cosmic ray muon telescopes. Now routine. No atomic clocks.
2. Muon beamlines at accelerator labs. Now routine. No atomic clocks.
3. Muon storage rings, like the ones for the g-2 experiment. No atomic
clocks.
4. K-long decay pipes. Now routine. No atomic clocks.
5. Muonic atoms, in experiments dating back to the 1960's. No atomic
clocks.
6. B-meson vertex reconstruction in silicon strip detectors in
collider experiments. No atomic clocks.
7. Neutrino oscillation studies since SuperKamiokande. No atomic
clocks.

This is just a sample of the ones I know off the top of my head
without doing any literature searches. You DO know how to do a
literature search, don't you?


We'll see what your oodles of evidence amount to.

André MIchaud

without anyone ever trying to
understand the real mechanical reason for the rate difference.

Don't forget that we have been thrown back to rationality's dark
age since the Copenhagen interpretation spread like wildfire
in the 1930's.

So easy to explain everything with magic. Why look for
real ground breaking reasons ?.

André Michaud

.

Relevant Pages

  • Science Disproves Evolution
    ... So orbital clocks seem to be more accurate than the extremely precise ... because the decrease in the speed-of-light measurements ceased ... atomic clocks were used to measure the speed of light. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • U.S. Naval Observatory to Add Leap Second to Clocks (Forwarded)
    ... second will be inserted at the U.S. Naval Observatory. ... clocks around the world. ... Man's oldest clock has always been the Earth. ... to the time kept by atomic clocks. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: The clock malfunctioned.
    ... that has been known about clocks for centuries. ... and not based on atomic clocks, confirms so-called time dilation? ... the explanation written in the reference for yourself, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The clock malfunctioned.
    ... that has been known about clocks for centuries. ... and not based on atomic clocks, confirms so-called time dilation? ... the explanation written in the reference for yourself, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The clock malfunctioned.
    ... that has been known about clocks for centuries. ... and not based on atomic clocks, confirms so-called time dilation? ... the explanation written in the reference for yourself, ...
    (sci.physics)