Re: The clock malfunctioned.

On 24 juil, 18:47, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 24, 2:31 pm, srp2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:



On 24 juil, 15:01, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 24, 10:57 am, srp2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On 23 juil, 01:18, "Spaceman" <space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

If 2 clocks show different times.
At least one clock malfunctioned in it's proper
counting rate.

Clocks are nothing more that "periodic counting machines".
When a clock does not "count" at the same
rate as another clock, at least one lost it's proper
counting rate.

Only relativist fools can not grasp such a simple fact
that has been known about clocks for centuries.
:)

The real problem really is that rate difference between ground
based atomic clocks and altitude based similar clocks is taken
as ultimate proof of time dilation

Well, THAT'S certainly not true. There's oodles of evidence of time
dilation that don't involve clocks up in the air at all. I don't know
where you get the idea that the whole thing depends on one experiment..

How vaguer and informationless can one get !

Ok. Out with your extended knowledge on the matter.

What other experiment was carried out, not involving atomic clocks
and not based on atomic clocks, confirms so-called time dilation ?

Lots of them:
1. Cosmic ray muon telescopes. Now routine. No atomic clocks.

And no trace of any proof of time dilation either.

2. Muon beamlines at accelerator labs. Now routine. No atomic clocks.

Same. No trace of any proof of time dilation.

3. Muon storage rings, like the ones for the g-2 experiment. No atomic
clocks.

Same.

4. K-long decay pipes. Now routine. No atomic clocks.

Same.

5. Muonic atoms, in experiments dating back to the 1960's. No atomic
clocks.

Same.

6. B-meson vertex reconstruction in silicon strip detectors in
collider experiments. No atomic clocks.

Same.

7. Neutrino oscillation studies since SuperKamiokande. No atomic
clocks.

Same.

This is just a sample of the ones I know off the top of my head
without doing any literature searches.

Well, you should have. Your opinion is worthless.

I repeat my simple question:

Find one experiment proving time dilation that was
carried out not based on atomic clocks. Give us
the formal reference and explain the proof for the
benefit of us all. Are you a real physicist of the
lonely keyboard addict you always proved to be ?

You DO know how to do a literature search, don't you?

Sure do. Do you ?

André Michaud
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The clock malfunctioned.
    ... that has been known about clocks for centuries. ... and not based on atomic clocks, confirms so-called time dilation? ... the explanation written in the reference for yourself, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The clock malfunctioned.
    ... that has been known about clocks for centuries. ... and not based on atomic clocks, confirms so-called time dilation? ... the explanation written in the reference for yourself, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The clock malfunctioned.
    ... that has been known about clocks for centuries. ... and not based on atomic clocks, confirms so-called time dilation? ... the explanation written in the reference for yourself, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Time Dilation Model, NO ONE can point out whats wrong
    ... A and B are adjacent and they both set their clocks to zero. ... what suffers the later measured time dilation when the two clocks are ... SR states that is the speed (not the acceleration) what causes the ... Any attempt to use an inertial frame to describe a body that ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Time Dilation Test
    ... This includes time dilation due to the earth's rotation ... > their flying clocks with a stationary one in Denver. ... and gravitation when comparing clocks accurately. ... Einstein addressed the twin paradox in special relativity ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Loading