Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2

Hi Autyumn D.C
This is Conrad Countess

You are using a different math system. But as math is a man made
measuring system of what we hope may be reality, my math as unorthodox
as it is cannot be that far off. Two vectors of motion applied by two
equal and 90 degree angular forces will create circular motion., its
as simple as that.
see this:: http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dsn5q6f_11vv737cck

You said: Vectors do both. But the cc in E=mcc is a linear square in
time, not
a rectangular square in span. Your maths suck.


Its not either in this case although it might be translated into each
other. The cc in this case is c in circular motion such as a
trajectory that would follow a 90 degree arc which if constant
creates a circle
or a balance of centripetal and centrifugal forces to produce orbital
or circular motion. v^2 and c^2 can be interpreted and translated into
all of these forms, but in this situation where energy turns to matter
at the high end of the EM spectrum it is precisely because it takes on
a circular or spherical form in order to form a particle or matter
wave, not a linear x linear form or a square form.. I only use the
rectangular form as an analogy and start off point to show that the
same two 90 degree angular lines that create the square can also
create a 90degree arc trajectory which if constant creates a circle.
The amount of energy in a rest mass particle can probably be
illustrated by comparing a square area to a straight line, but the
trajectory of the wave can only be shown by the 90 degree arc which if
constant creates a circle, that it would take following the two 90
degreed lines of force.
As an example see this :

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/transcripts/3213_einstein.html

Containing this passage:
EMILIE DU CHÂTELET: Using Newton's formulas, Monsieur Voltaire, he
then drops a second ball from a higher height, calculated to exactly
double the speed of the first ball on impact.
So, Messieurs, care for a little wager? Newton tells us that by
doubling the speed of the ball, we will double the distance it travels
into the clay. Leibniz asks us to square that speed. If he is correct
the ball will travel not two, but four times as far. So who is
correct?

They are demonstrating the difference between Newton's (F=mv) and
Leibniz (F=mv^2) as an indication that force increase 4x as velocity
doubles, not that velocity is multiplied by itself in a linear manner
v^2 and c^2 can be interpreted in all these ways.

Conrad Countess
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Geometrical interpretation of c^2
    ... You are using a different math system. ... equal and 90 degree angular forces will create circular motion., ... not a linear x linear form or a square form.. ... double the speed of the first ball on impact. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Yo - JohnH
    ... mathematics, from the classical to the contemporary. ... presents math as an eternally fixed array of computations, ... Latin squares, the irrationality of the square root of two, the ... percent probability I?ll get a six in the next 12 rolls of this die,? ...
    (rec.boats)
  • Re: one of my other "passions"
    ... I also like square dancing but I prefer contradancing. ... New generation of square dancers intrigued by its math concepts ... Bryant stopped them to see if they could identify which dancers were the apex of a triangle or how many diamond shapes were in one formation. ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
    ... But to say that any math ... Any mass moving through the ether, ... If a small ball hits a large ball, ... Newtonian physics at every step. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The state-of-the-art in mathematics - The Smart Complex Number System -
    ... I think Professor Escultura is trying to enlighten you. ... >> I think alot of the basic vocabulary of math was written a long time ago. ... >>And again if we square this, ... Correction: ...
    (sci.math)