# Re: #22 making precise the Energy-Levels of Matter ; Fusion Barrier

*From*: Matthew Johnson <matthew_member@xxxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: 31 Jul 2008 11:52:27 -0700

In article <a63c6078-f55e-4d54-8ffd-deb3277dee6b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,

plutonium.archimedes@xxxxxxxxx says...

[snip]

I should be able to make those Energy Levels far more precise by

saying this:

(1) Electron Energy Exchanges

(2) Nucleus Energy Exchanges

(3) Entire Atom Energy Exchanges

Chemical Energy is really all about chemical bonds and thus is about

electron energy

interactions. Burning of coal or any fossil fuel or the hydroelectric

dam or windmill or

geothermal are all examples of Electron Energy Exchanges.

Fission and Fusion are the nuclear energy exchanges.

So far this looks mostly OK...

And when we combine both electron and nucleus exchanges we have the

entire atom

of its energy exchanges and the specific interaction of Matter to

Antimatter Interaction.

but this is beginning to go off: none of these 'exchanges' converts more than a

tiny fraction of the rest-energy into free energy. So combining both exchanges

does NOT convert the whole atom.

So in the Fusion Barrier Principle, there is never a question of

breakeven for that of

Electron Energy Exchanges because we never have to put half of the

Maxwell Equations

in a tussle fight with the other half of the Maxwell Equations. In

Nuclear Energy

Exchanges we have the Dynamic Laws of Faraday and Ampere in an

inextricable conflict

of control over the machine to extract energy by trying to overcome

the NonDynamic Coulomb

law of Maxwell Equations.

And this is just bizarre. It sounds like the kind of misunderstanding that

emerges when people read popular books on science, but never learn the concepts

fully, as would be done by solving homework problems in a college text on the

same topics.

There is not "tussle fight" between Maxwell's Equations: all the equations are

always satisfied throughout the entire process.

[snip]

.

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Sharing data with Little Green Men** - Next by Date:
**Re: Bible Proves Einstein is Wrong** - Previous by thread:
**Re: Cancel Ares - No one seems to understand stability theory** - Next by thread:
**Re: THE PROBABILITY OF HELL** - Index(es):