sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Backing of a Piezo Transducer
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physics of the Soul
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Physics of the Soul
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Physics of the Soul
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: The phase of matter
  • From: falderals
• The structure of the material on the photon hypothesis
  • From: yinbing-zhou
• Re: Science News for Kids: Polar Ice Feels the Heat
  • From: jimp
• Re: Science News for Kids: Polar Ice Feels the Heat
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Science News for Kids: Polar Ice Feels the Heat
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Science News for Kids: Polar Ice Feels the Heat
  • From: jimp
• Re: blackbody absorption spectrum
  • From: Will Janoschka
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Jerry
• Re: a thought experiment
  • From: RichD
• Re: interpreting circuit
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Obama Insane
• Re: interpreting circuit
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: interpreting circuit
  • From: patrol_boat
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Sue...
• Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Beam Me Up, Scotty!
  • From: Spaceman
• Quantum Gravity 288.7: U.C. Berkeley USA Finds [0, 1] Scale Very Relevant to Cosmology
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Physics of Jesus Abilities
  • From: Benj
• Re: Beam Me Up, Scotty!
  • From: Obama Insane
• Re: Beam Me Up, Scotty!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: electric car companies engaged in planned obsolescence???
  • From: Benj
• Re: Beam Me Up, Scotty!
  • From: Obama Insane
• Re: a thought experiment
  • From: Benj
• Re: Happy days... !
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Beam Me Up, Scotty!
  • From: Obama Insane
• Re: Beam Me Up, Scotty!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "Spooky" Physicists Up Close!
  • From: Obama Insane
• Re: Beam Me Up, Scotty!
  • From: PD
• ORBITAL MECHANICS
  • From: orbitalmechanic
• ORBITAL MECHANICS
  • From: orbitalmechanic
• Re: "Spooky" Physicists Up Close!
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Hawking Radiation and Information
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Science News for Kids: Polar Ice Feels the Heat
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Science Roundup
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Physics of the Soul
  • From: Danny Milano
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Anig
• Re: Backing of a Piezo Transducer
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Science Roundup
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Physics of the Soul
  • From: Damaeus
• Backing of a Piezo Transducer
  • From: nick0039
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Y.Porat
• My ads in the CAUT Bulletin
  • From: Mehran Basti
• a thought experiment
  • From: RichD
• Re: higher moment decomposition for exponential distributions?
  • From: Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: "Spooky" Physicists Up Close!
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: "Spooky" Physicists Up Close!
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: interpreting circuit
  • From: Benj
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Anig
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: New theory - "superpoints"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: PD
• Re: New theory - "superpoints"
  • From: gazeta
• Re: New theory - "superpoints"
  • From: gazeta
• Re: New theory - "superpoints"
  • From: gazeta
• Re: New theory - "superpoints"
  • From: gazeta
• Re: New theory - "superpoints"
  • From: gazeta
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: cyclotron cern black hole
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: cyclotron cern black hole
  • From: sleeplessinsomniak
• Re: interpreting circuit
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Quantum Gravity 288.1: A Strange "Growth" Riccati-Like Equation: Dxy(f(x,y)) = +/- f(x,y)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Japan
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Colonial Expansion In South America
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Japan
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Fireworks math.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physics of the Soul
  • From: Danny Milano
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Raghar
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: PD
• Re: New theory - "superpoints"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: PD
• electric car companies engaged in planned obsolescence???
  • From: strollivarious
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: hanson
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: cyclotron cern black hole
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Fireworks math.
  • From: AZFIREBALL
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "This is a stupid hypothetical" is not an answer!
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: PD
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Happy days... !
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Corr Edwards
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physics of the Soul
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Physics of the Soul
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Brain Interaction with the Quantum Field
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Fireworks math.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Fireworks math.
  • From: AZFIREBALL
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: two rotations make a sphere
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: two rotations make a sphere
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: two rotations make a sphere
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: cyclotron cern black hole
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physics of the Soul
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Help in understanding paper on relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Corr Edwards
• Re: Are neutrinos Majorana particles?
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: Are neutrinos Majorana particles?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: two rotations make a sphere
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Mr. Berlusconi and album of love songs
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Mr. Berlusconi and album of love songs
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Hubble Limit is the end of the EM Force
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Strange Clouds at the Edge of Space
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: empirical evidence for gravitational field of EM radiation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: empirical evidence for gravitational field of EM radiation
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: OK for Engineering student to take Intro to Physics first?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: empirical evidence for gravitational field of EM radiation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: CANDO?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: empirical evidence for gravitational field of EM radiation
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: empirical evidence for gravitational field of EM radiation
  • From: Sue...
• CANDO?
  • From: Dieter Britz
• Brain Interaction with the Quantum Field
  • From: damaeus
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Hubble Limit is the end of the EM Force
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Spaceman
• Quantum Gravity 287.5: Entanglements of the "Third Kind": Classical, Quantum, Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Good Thing Einstien Wasn't a Traffic Cop!
  • From: Huang
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: obamas_insane
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Igor
• Re: Hubble Limit is the end of the EM Force
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Hubble Limit is the end of the EM Force
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Cockroft Walton Qu.
  • From: Benj
• Hubble Limit is the end of the EM Force
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A Question to Sue on Magnetism
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Cockroft Walton Qu.
  • From: jfisher864
• Re: Cockroft Walton Qu.
  • From: jfisher864
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: NoEinstein
• solutions manual to Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, 5th By Bruce,R. Munson, Donald
  • From: sendsolutions
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: 2010 Astrophysics
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum Gravity 287.0: Canada on Negative vs Positive Cosmological Constants and +/- Entanglement
  • From: hanson
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physics of Jesus Abilities
  • From: Danny Milano
• solutions manual
  • From: happyman
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: PD
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Anig
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: srp2inc
• Emitted light travel variant versus objects in cartesian cordinate systems.
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: A Question to Sue on Magnetism
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "This is a stupid hypothetical" is not an answer!
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Physics of Jesus Abilities
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: obamas_insane
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Wireless Power Nearly There
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Physicists 'See' Single Top Quarks at the Tevatron
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: A note about Mrs. Clinton
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Dr. Mary Ruwart
• Physics of Jesus Abilities
  • From: Danny Milano
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Info transfer rate and the non constant speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: OK for Engineering student to take Intro to Physics first?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Musings of a Dummy
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: A Question to Sue on Magnetism
  • From: obamas_insane
• Re: A Question to Sue on Magnetism
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Stop the monkey buisness
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Anig
• Re: Musings of a Dummy
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Stop the monkey buisness
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: wavelength times frequency the correct way
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Dr. Mary Ruwart
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Aug 25, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: The Middle East Peace Plan
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: "This is a stupid hypothetical" is not an answer!
  • From: Mike W
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• There are two kinds of spaces and time:
  • From: socratus
• Re: The Middle East Peace Plan
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "This is a stupid hypothetical" is not an answer!
  • From: obamas_insane
• Re: Musings of a Dummy
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Musings of a Dummy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Hansen '88, then and now
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: "This is a stupid hypothetical" is not an answer!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Dr. Mary Ruwart
• Re: 2010 Astrophysics
  • From: jimp
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Einstien Repost
  • From: hostlocal
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Faster than light information transfer? (ver.2)
  • From: Glenn Møller-Holst
• Faster than light information transfer?
  • From: Glenn Møller-Holst
• Steps For Solving World Crises
  • From: Mehran Basti
• What is a trajectory?
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Spaceman
• solutions manual
  • From: sendsolutions
• Re: Accelerating a mass with a spring - Help please!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 22 Aug 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Quantum Gravity 287.2: More Re U.K. Negative Cosmological Constant
  • From: OsherD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Compost messages
  • From: cmunhollon
• Re: Physicists 'See' Single Top Quarks at the Tevatron
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Twin Paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: OK for Engineering student to take Intro to Physics first?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Twin Paradox debunking 101
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Twin Paradox debunking 101
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: OG
• Re: Twin Paradox debunking 101
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: wavelength times frequency the correct way
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twin Paradox debunking 101
  • From: Sue...
• Hansen '88, then and now
  • From: Mike Jr.
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Emit
• Open sounce FDTD electromagnetic simulation codes in Java now available
  • From: FDTD
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: wavelength times frequency the correct way
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: wavelength times frequency the correct way
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: wavelength times frequency the correct way
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: wavelength times frequency the correct way
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• APS » Journals » Physics » Editorials » Introducing Physics
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: OK for Engineering student to take Intro to Physics first?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: wavelength times frequency the correct way
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: OK for Engineering student to take Intro to Physics first?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Australian Space Weather Agency moves predicted cycle 24 start date out 6 months
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Fireball XL5
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Time does not exist
  • From: Another User
• Re: What nuclear reactions are attributed to cosmic rays?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OK for Engineering student to take Intro to Physics first?
  • From: Benj
• Re: OK for Engineering student to take Intro to Physics first?
  • From: Benj
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: wavelength times frequency the correct way
  • From: Spaceman
• Quantum Gravity 286.91: Classical K.E. = (1/2)mv^2 Versus Early Entanglement 1/3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Ron Mallet's time machine
  • From: fjmd1a@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Androcles
• Re: If we keep digging hole on Earth? What will happen?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Peter Munn
• Re: wavelength times frequency the correct way
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: OK for Engineering student to take Intro to Physics first?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: wavelength times frequency the correct way
  • From: PD
• Re: OK for Engineering student to take Intro to Physics first?
  • From: kronecker
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: hanson
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Fire Flys on wings and cries
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Will you drink Martians' blood?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: wavelength times frequency the correct way
  • From: Spaceman
• AW: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: eduart wolf
• Re: wavelength times frequency the correct way
  • From: PD
• Re: wavelength times frequency the correct way
  • From: PD
• Re: wavelength times frequency the correct way
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Earth viewing distance
  • From: Michael J. Strickland
• Re: OK for Engineering student to take Intro to Physics first?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: OK for Engineering student to take Intro to Physics first?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• OK for Engineering student to take Intro to Physics first?
  • From: me
• Re: Physicist says Higgs Boson to be found by 2010!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Dr. Mary Ruwart
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: OG
• Quantum Gravity 286.9: Early Universe Had 1/3 Entanglement By Equation of State
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Where does the mass go the sun looses?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Physicist says Higgs Boson to be found by 2010!
  • From: YKhan
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Jonathan Thiessen
• Re: Wavelength measurements
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The surface of the 4th dimension
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme Fl is Nazi Germany Hansel is Hitler
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why the Physics Law holds good?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Ron Mallet's time machine
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Spaceman
• Why the Physics Law holds good?
  • From: thaif
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Physicist says Higgs Boson to be found by 2010!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Earth viewing distance
  • From: OG
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Ian Parker
• My opinion about “ black hole”
  • From: socratus
• Earth viewing distance
  • From: Terry Pinnell
• Re: Quantum Gravity 286.7: Netherlands and PRC Apply Fundamental Set in Important Number Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: YKhan
• Re: Where does the mass go the sun looses?
  • From: Artfishlintlgenz
• Re: Where does the mass go the sun looses?
  • From: YKhan
• Re: Where does the mass go the sun looses?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Winston Smith
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Igor
• Re: Where does the mass go the sun looses?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling objec
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: A lot of Solution Manuals in Electronic (PDF)Format!
  • From: Reginaldo . Garza
• Re: Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Where does the mass go the sun looses?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Question for the Relativity deniers
  • From: Corr Edwards
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Climate Change By the Numbers
  • From: jimp
• Re: Where does the mass go the sun looses?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where does the mass go the sun looses?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Exact Math
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: Physicist says Higgs Boson to be found by 2010!
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: Physicist says Higgs Boson to be found by 2010!
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: #4 first-off, old Maxwell Equations then new Maxwell Equations New book: Revised Maxwell Equations-- the AP-Maxwell Equations, which has gravity as a term in Faraday's Law
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Where does the mass go the sun looses?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Exact Math
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Climate Change By the Numbers
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physicist says Higgs Boson to be found by 2010!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Where does the mass go the sun looses?
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Climate Change By the Numbers
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Climate Change By the Numbers
  • From: jimp
• Re: Climate Change By the Numbers
  • From: jimp
• Exact Math
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling objec
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Climate Change By the Numbers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Cheapest Solar power, even cheaper than Coal & Gas.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Both arctic and antarctic ice caps are doing well
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Benj
• Re: Refrigeration using polar polymers
  • From: Mike Jr.
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Emit
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: American made electric car
  • From: none
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: What if the Higgs boson is not found?
  • From: Laurent
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: What if the universe is a simulation?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Both arctic and antarctic ice caps are doing well
  • From: Dr. Mary Ruwart
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Dr. Mary Ruwart
• Re: Pr¨˘vo ? -- Faradayova z¨˘kona
  • From: kunzmilan
• Re: Both arctic and antarctic ice caps are doing well
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: American made electric car
  • From: Benj
• Re: nanoparticle field emission thrusters
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Quantum Gravity 286.4: Electrostatics Generate Entanglement, and Newtonian Gravitation Generates Maximum Entanglement
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 286.5: Newton's F = ma vs F = d(mv)/dt and Entanglement
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Both arctic and antarctic ice caps are doing well
  • From: jimp
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Both arctic and antarctic ice caps are doing well
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Entanglement
  • From: novice
• nanoparticle field emission thrusters
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: #1-#3 New book: Revised Maxwell Equations-- the AP-Maxwell Equations, which has gravity as a term in Faraday's Law
  • From: John Polasek
• Are neutrinos Majorana particles?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Cheapest Solar power, even cheaper than Coal & Gas.
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Light has no electric charge or magnetic poles
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: American made electric car
  • From: none
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: CERN Black Hole Generator Online Soon
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Refrigeration using polar polymers
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Refrigeration using polar polymers
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: CERN Black Hole Generator Online Soon
  • From: Androcles
• Re: #1-#3 New book: Revised Maxwell Equations-- the AP-Maxwell Equations, which has gravity as a term in Faraday's Law
  • From: plutonium . archimedes
• Re: What if the universe is a simulation?
  • From: Benj
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Refrigeration using polar polymers
  • From: Benj
• Re: American made electric car
  • From: Benj
• Re: Refrigeration using polar polymers
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: #1-#3 New book: Revised Maxwell Equations-- the AP-Maxwell Equations, which has gravity as a term in Faraday's Law
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Can body heat be converted into energy?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: American made electric car
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Refrigeration using polar polymers
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What if the Higgs boson is not found?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Does Einstein's E=mc^2 (violate) or (transcend) dimensional analysis?
  • From: PD
• Re: Can body heat be converted into energy?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: d r?tt ? -- Faradays lag
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Does Einstein's E=mc^2 (violate) or (transcend) dimensional analysis?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Does Einstein's E=mc^2 (violate) or (transcend) dimensional analysis?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: PD
• Does Einstein's E=mc^2 (violate) or (transcend) dimensional analysis?
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Can body heat be converted into energy?
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Quantum Gravity 286.4: Electrostatics Generate Entanglement, and Newtonian Gravitation Generates Maximum Entanglement
  • From: Dudly
• Re: The rich live slower, not just longer.
  • From: hanson
• Re: "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Both arctic and antarctic ice caps are doing well
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The rich live slower, not just longer.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What if the Higgs boson is not found?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The rich live slower, not just longer.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Raghar
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: hanson
• American made electric car
  • From: misterfact@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light has no electric charge or magnetic poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum Gravity 286.4: Electrostatics Generate Entanglement, and Newtonian Gravitation Generates Maximum Entanglement
  • From: hostlocal
• Re: The rich live slower, not just longer.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• solutions manual
  • From: sendsolutions
• Re: Refrigeration using polar polymers
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What if the Higgs boson is not found?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Androcles
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Emit
• Re: The wormhole joke
  • From: Spaceman
• Refrigeration using polar polymers
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: What if the Higgs boson is not found?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: What if the Higgs boson is not found?
  • From: PD
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Dr. Mary Ruwart
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: hwabnig
• Re: Both arctic and antarctic ice caps are doing well
  • From: Dr. Mary Ruwart
• Re: What if the Higgs boson is not found?
  • From: YKhan
• Re: What if the Higgs boson is not found?
  • From: YKhan
• Re: The wormhole joke
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Physics of Jesus Hair
  • From: socratus
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum Gravity 286.4: Electrostatics Generate Entanglement, and Newtonian Gravitation Generates Maximum Entanglement
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 286.4: Electrostatics Generate Entanglement, and Newtonian Gravitation Generates Maximum Entanglement
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: Benj
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: Benj
• Re: Physics of Jesus Hair
  • From: Danny Milano
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Quantum Gravity 286.3: Maxwell-Faraday's Law Del X E = -Dt(B) Related to Entanglement |Dst(f)|
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Physics of Jesus Hair
  • From: hanson
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Physics of Jesus Hair
  • From: jimp
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Sue...
• Re: #31 gravity as Displacement Magnetism in Faraday Law provides a explanation of the concept of "center of gravity" ;monograph-book: UNIFICATION OF THE FORCES OF PHYSICS AS A COULOMB UNIFICATION
  • From: _ Prof. Jonez _
• Re: Physics of Jesus Hair
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Wavelength measurements
  • From: hostlocal
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: What if the Higgs boson is not found?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: What if the Higgs boson is not found?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light has no electric charge or magnetic poles
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What if the Higgs boson is not found?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The wormhole joke
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What if the universe is a simulation?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physics of Jesus Hair
  • From: Danny Milano
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Ray Vickson
• What if the Higgs boson is not found?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• The wormhole joke
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: hanson
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: tadchem
• What if the universe is a simulation?
  • From: Nomen Nescio
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: hanson
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Physics of Jesus Hair
  • From: hanson
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: PD
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• A lot of Solution Manuals
  • From: sendsolutions
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: Androcles
• Re: STRICH: Strict Analyses of the Einstein Elevator Gedanken
  • From: PD
• Re: Wrong Observation !!!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: hanson
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: hanson
• Re: Physics of Jesus Hair
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: I know how God created the universe
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Life found on Mars: atomic force microscopy of Phoenix reveals a halophile
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Physics of Jesus Hair
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physics of Jesus Hair
  • From: socratus
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: PD
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: PD
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: PD
• Re: Life found on Mars: atomic force microscopy of Phoenix reveals a halophile
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: jmfbahciv
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Aug 18, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Nice to Know Fl.is Controlled by only Money
  • From: Will Janoschka
• Re: Nice to Know Fl.is Controlled by only Money
  • From: Will Janoschka
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: Androcles
• Physics of Jesus Hair
  • From: Danny Milano
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Where atomic shells orginate
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: hanson
• Re: Bullfoot DNA results in
  • From: rick_sobie
• Google Groups KillFile
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Wavelength measurements
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: Tom Potter
• Galaxy formation is driven by mass of the host dark matter halo
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: Tom Potter
• Daily Earth Temperatures from Satellites
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Why did Marie Antoinette say: "Let them eat cake."
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple proof why wavelength times frequency is not a relative "speed" at all.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple proof why wavelength times frequency is not a relative "speed" at all.
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: The five most important questions in the world
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Simple proof why wavelength times frequency is not a relative "speed" at all.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Simple proof why wavelength times frequency is not a relative "speed" at all.
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Bullfoot DNA results in
  • From: mike3
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simple proof why wavelength times frequency is not a relative "speed" at all.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Bigfoot found
  • From: mike3
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Simple proof why wavelength times frequency is not a relative "speed" at all.
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Scientists use plant chemicals to replicate key photosynthesis process to split water into hydrogen & oxygen
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Simple proof why wavelength times frequency is not a relative "speed" at all.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple proof why wavelength times frequency is not a relative "speed" at all.
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Simple proof why wavelength times frequency is not a relative "speed" at all.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Scientists use plant chemicals to replicate key photosynthesis process to split water into hydrogen & oxygen
  • From: Igor
• Re: Simple proof why wavelength times frequency is not a relative "speed" at all.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Scientists use plant chemicals to replicate key photosynthesis process to split water into hydrogen & oxygen
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: requesting feedback on model for understanding SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Bullfoot DNA results in
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: PD
• Re: requesting feedback on model for understanding SR
  • From: Gabriel Green
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: PD
• Re: requesting feedback on model for understanding SR
  • From: Roger Davis
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Spaceman
• Simple proof why wavelength times frequency is not a relative "speed" at all.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Solar cycle 24, looking like a dud, stays on track signaling start of another extended down period
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Scientists use plant chemicals to replicate key photosynthesis process to split water into hydrogen & oxygen
  • From: Mike Jr.
• NREL Solar Cell Sets World Efficiency Record at 40.8 Percent
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: The universe is creating life
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: requesting feedback on model for understanding SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Plant do not have consciousness / Brain
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Wrong Observation !!!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Quantum Gravity 286.2: Reading Code Effectiveness ("Perception") As Intertwiner of Genetic Code
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Wrong Observation !!!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Wrong Observation !!!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: jimp
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: jimp
• Re: The universe is creating life
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: requesting feedback on model for understanding SR
  • From: Roger Davis
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: Benj
• Re: requesting feedback on model for understanding SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: Benj
• Re: Wavelength measurements
  • From: scidefgrp
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: madscientist
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Iam
• Re: Nothingness. ? !!!
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: requesting feedback on model for understanding SR
  • From: Gabriel Green
• Quantum Gravity 286.1: Lotka-Volterra (Predator-Prey) Equations are Entangled
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Both arctic and antarctic ice caps are doing well
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Inovabrasil 15_08_08 - 20 artigos + lidos (91 artigos postados)
  • From: Rogerio
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: requesting feedback on model for understanding SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Wrong Observation !!!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Where do they stand on science?
  • From: Armadillo_Tamer
• Re: requesting feedback on model for understanding SR
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time travel = perpetual motion machine? Time travel = Horn of Plenty? OR NOT?
  • From: Androcles
• Wrong Observation !!!
  • From: Sanny
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• requesting feedback on model for understanding SR
  • From: Gabriel Green
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: Benj
• Quantum Gravity 286.0: Strings and Double Helixes as Spacetime "Intertwiners"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Wavelength measurements
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 15 Aug 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Time travel = perpetual motion machine? Time travel = Horn of Plenty? OR NOT?
  • From: mike3
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: jimp
• KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: metspitzer
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Gell-Mann commutator algebra wrong?
  • From: akalaniz
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What It’s Like After Death: The New Paradigm Revelations
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Louis_N
• Re: Bigfoot found
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: jimp
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: jimp
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: Benj
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Mike Jr.
• What It’s Like After Death: The New Paradigm Revelations
  • From: sufigeorge
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: Benj
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Questions on faster than light
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Huang
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Questions on faster than light
  • From: madscientist
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: jimp
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: jimp
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: metspitzer
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: Benj
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Nice to Know Fl.is Controlled by only Money
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: hanson
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: jimp
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: jimp
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Nothingness. ? !!!
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Nothingness. ? !!!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: TRUTH IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Nice to Know Fl.is Controlled by only Money
  • From: hanson
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Huang
• Re: Nice to Know Fl.is Controlled by only Money
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The five most important questions in the world
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How many Dimensions Universe has?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Plant do not have consciousness / Brain
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Where do they stand on science?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Nothingness. ? !!!
  • From: socratus
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Where do they stand on science?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Where do they stand on science?
  • From: PD
• Loop Quantum Gravity Resources and Books
  • From: Mushfiq
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: PD
• Re: The five most important questions in the world
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: Where do they stand on science?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: The five most important questions in the world
  • From: PD
• Re: Where do they stand on science?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: STRICH: Strict Analyses of the Einstein Elevator Gedanken
  • From: Florian
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- August 15, 2008
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH: Strict Analyses of the Einstein Elevator Gedanken
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: kronecker
• Quantum Gravity 285.9: A Negative vs Positive Group Action on Phase Space
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 285.8: How Smolin's LQG (Loop Quantum Gravity) and Penrose's Twistor's Missed the Jacobson Radical
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The five most important questions in the world
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Bigfoot found
  • From: kronecker
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: jimp
• Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: socratus
• Re: Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Solar power using a magnifying glass
  • From: metspitzer
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: PD
• physicsworld.com special LT25 newswire
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: THE GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT FRAUD
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Huang
• Re: STRICH: Strict Analyses of the Einstein Elevator Gedanken
  • From: Igor
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: jimp
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: hostlocal
• Re: Bigfoot found
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Bigfoot found
  • From: tadchem
• Re: STRICH: Strict Analyses of the Einstein Elevator Gedanken
  • From: Florian
• Re: Where do they stand on science?
  • From: OG
• Re: Where do they stand on science?
  • From: Armadillo_Tamer
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• OT: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 15 Aug 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: Time travel = perpetual motion machine? Time travel = Horn of Plenty? OR NOT?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Where do they stand on science?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- August 15, 2008
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: THE GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT FRAUD
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Time travel = perpetual motion machine? Time travel = Horn of Plenty? OR NOT?
  • From: mike3
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Wavelength measurements
  • From: Androcles
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Wavelength measurements
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: STRICH: Strict Analyses of the Einstein Elevator Gedanken
  • From: PD
• Special Beijing Olympics 2008 issue: Science and sports
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH: Strict Analyses of the Einstein Elevator Gedanken
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Wavelength measurements
  • From: xray4abc
• Where do they stand on science?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Long life needs money.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: STRICH: Strict Analyses of the Einstein Elevator Gedanken
  • From: Florian
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH: Strict Analyses of the Einstein Elevator Gedanken
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Wavelength measurements
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Inside Science News Briefs -- August 15, 2008
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: THE UNIVERSE-MECHANICS
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: STRICH: Strict Analyses of the Einstein Elevator Gedanken
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: Long life needs money.
  • From: hanson
• Bigfoot found
  • From: kronecker
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Long life needs money.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Long life needs money.
  • From: hanson
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH: Strict Analyses of the Einstein Elevator Gedanken
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Long life needs money.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• solutions manual
  • From: sendsolutions
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Sue...
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Iam
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Iam
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• STRICH: Strict Analyses of the Einstein Elevator Gedanken
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimental verification
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Quantum Physics Exam. (The Quantity of Eternity)
  • From: Y
• Quantum Physics Exam. (The Quantity of Eternity)
  • From: Y
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Tom Potter
• Why did Marie Antoinette say: "Let them eat cake."
  • From: Tom Potter
• Why did Caesar say "I came. I saw. I conquered."
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quantum Gravity 285.7: Are "Mass Operators" Missing From Quantum Logic?
  • From: OsherD
• Time, a consequence of physical processes
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Quantum Gravity 285.6: Using the Mass Cone to "Artificially" Induce Inflation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Differentials in automobiles. What triggers it?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Experimental verification
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 285.5: Comparison of Jacobson Radical Mass Cone and Sr/GR Light Cone
  • From: OsherD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: hanson
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• physicsworld.com newswire (Week 33)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How many Dimensions Universe has?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: PD
• Rainfall warms troposphere, reduces cirroform clouds, reducing global greenhouse factor
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Roy Spencer August 9, 2008 RESEARCH UPDATE
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: Jonathan Thiessen
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Experimental verification
  • From: Igor
• Re: Time travel = perpetual motion machine? Time travel = Horn of Plenty? OR NOT?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Why Octonions 1: Introduction
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The five most important questions in the world
  • From: jamesfenson
• Re: Time travel = perpetual motion machine? Time travel = Horn of Plenty? OR NOT?
  • From: mike3
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: socratus
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Why Octonions 1: Introduction
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Wavelength measurements
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Strich 9
• Quantum Gravity 285.4: Derivation of the Mass Cone m^2 = r^2 + t^2 From Circle Composition (Star) Product
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Nice to Know Fl.is Controlled by only Money
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Experimental verification
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Experimental verification
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: Wavelength measurements
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Wavelength measurements
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Nice to Know Fl.is Controlled by only Money
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Wavelength measurements
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Experimental verification
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: NASA mistook bodily fluids as Mars water source.
  • From: mauimary
• Re: Wavelength measurements
  • From: Androcles
• Experimental verification
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Wavelength measurements
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Wavelength measurements
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Plant do not have consciousness / Brain
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Wavelength measurements
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Feeding Lightning Bolts back into the grid
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• NASA mistook bodily fluids as Mars water source.
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Wavelength measurements
  • From: mauimary
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Wavelength measurements
  • From: xray4abc
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Iam
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Androcles
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Feeding Lightning Bolts back into the grid
  • From: Androcles
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: mike3
• Re: Feeding Lightning Bolts back into the grid
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Gravity 285.3: Mass Is Ultra-Entangled by Probable Correlation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Quantum Gravity 285.3: Mass Is Ultra-Entangled by Probable Correlation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Using the Rickmatt as a backup
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Differentials in automobiles. What triggers it?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Differentials in automobiles. What triggers it?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Why Universe is expanding?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why Universe is expanding?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: why is work a scalar...
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Lets VOTE Einstine Theory.
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Differentials in automobiles. What triggers it?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Why Octonions 1: Introduction
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Feeding Lightning Bolts back into the grid
  • From: El Tardo Armonica
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Why Universe is expanding?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Feeding Lightning Bolts back into the grid
  • From: mauimary
• Re: Feeding Lightning Bolts back into the grid
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Feeding Lightning Bolts back into the grid
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Feeding Lightning Bolts back into the grid
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Igor
• Feeding Lightning Bolts back into the grid
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: why is work a scalar...
  • From: Igor
• Re: why is work a scalar...
  • From: Igor
• Re: why is work a scalar...
  • From: PD
• Re: why is work a scalar...
  • From: PD
• Re: why is work a scalar...
  • From: zxcv_890
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: why is work a scalar...
  • From: PD
• Re: why is work a scalar...
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: why is work a scalar...
  • From: zxcv_890
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why did Richard P. Feynman say, "I love only nature, and I hate mathematicians"?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: mike3
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Time travel = perpetual motion machine? Time travel = Horn of Plenty? OR NOT?
  • From: mike3
• Re: Time travel = perpetual motion machine? Time travel = Horn of Plenty? OR NOT?
  • From: mike3
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time travel = perpetual motion machine? Time travel = Horn of Plenty? OR NOT?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Differentials in automobiles. What triggers it?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Differentials in automobiles. What triggers it?
  • From: Gan
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gas heating during adiabatic compression
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time travel = perpetual motion machine? Time travel = Horn of Plenty? OR NOT?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: PD
• Re: Is EINSTEIN new CHRIST?
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Time travel = perpetual motion machine? Time travel = Horn of Plenty? OR NOT?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Ian Parker
• KEEP UR LAW CLIENTS
  • From: mathi
• Re: Gas heating during adiabatic compression
  • From: tadchem
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: mike3
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: mike3
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: mike3
• Time travel = perpetual motion machine? Time travel = Horn of Plenty? OR NOT?
  • From: mike3
• Quantum Gravity 285.2: Loyola Marymount U. of Los Angeles California and India Develop Unparticles and Riccati Differential Equation Time-Varying Cosmological Constant
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Is EINSTEIN new CHRIST?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: HEPs expelled by galactic jets Dark Matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• pushpa
  • From: latha
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Huang
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• HEPs expelled by galactic jets Dark Matter
  • From: john
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Gas heating during adiabatic compression
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Archimedes Plutonium Cancel FAQ
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Huang
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Androcles
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: why is work a scalar...
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is EINSTEIN new CHRIST?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Why Octonions 1: Introduction
  • From: tadchem
• Quantum Gravity 285.1: Unification at t = 0 with m = t o r
  • From: OsherD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 285.0: Asymptotics of M = L^3 T^(-2) and Why Scaling into [0, 1] is Needed in Our Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why Octonions 8: Concluding Remarks
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Gas heating during adiabatic compression
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Gas heating during adiabatic compression
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Androcles
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Relativity and the Nazi meme
  • From: Talebun
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: physics_club@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Restrictions On Minority Positions
  • From: Mehran Basti
• Re: Gas heating during adiabatic compression
  • From: Androcles
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Gas heating during adiabatic compression
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Is EINSTEIN new CHRIST?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Experimenting with earthquake an earthquake prediction theory.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Long life needs money.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is EINSTEIN new CHRIST?
  • From: hwabnig
• Re: What happens to force in the atomic shell
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The five most important questions in the world
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Gas heating during adiabatic compression
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: 106mpg Car!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is EINSTEIN new CHRIST?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: virtual particle separation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Time travel... again...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Stellar Splitting and pairing NEW Black holes found inside several Nebula
  • From: Dave Parker
• Re: Stellar Splitting and pairing NEW Black holes found inside several Nebula
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Quantum Gravity 285.0: Asymptotics of M = L^3 T^(-2) and Why Scaling into [0, 1] is Needed in Our Universe
  • From: mauimary
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Quantum Gravity 285.0: Asymptotics of M = L^3 T^(-2) and Why Scaling into [0, 1] is Needed in Our Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Is EINSTEIN new CHRIST?
  • From: GigaS
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Why Octonions 8: Concluding Remarks
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Why Octonions 8: Concluding Remarks
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Why Octonions 1: Introduction
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Time travel... again...
  • From: Dr. Mary Ruwart
• Stellar Splitting and pairing NEW Black holes found inside several Nebula
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: why is work a scalar...
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Archimedes Plutonium Cancel FAQ
  • From: El Tardo
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Time travel... again...
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: 106mpg Car!
  • From: jimp
• Re: 106mpg Car!
  • From: kronecker
• Re: Inferior mathematics and science (Part II)
  • From: hanson
• Visible Light Enters the Bizarro World
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Water Striders Put Best Foot Forward
  • From: Sam Wormley
• extreme global weight (developing dedanoe's static lever)
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: why is work a scalar...
  • From: dedanoe
• Quantum Gravity 284.999: The Closeness of Causation and "Anti-Causation" in a Multiverse Circle Composition Product and Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: why is work a scalar...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• why is work a scalar...
  • From: zxcv_890
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 11 August 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Experimenting with earthquake an earthquake prediction theory.
  • From: jimp
• Re: SMITHSONIAN ERECTS STATUE OF PAUL MYERS
  • From: Cletis Perkins
• Experimenting with earthquake an earthquake prediction theory.
  • From: shoppersplace
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: thoovler
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Time travel... again...
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Time travel... again...
  • From: Spaceman
• The five most important questions in the world
  • From: jamesfenson
• Re: Confusion over complex electromagnetic field
  • From: Darwin123
• virtual particle separation
  • From: john
• Re: Time travel... again...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time travel... again...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time travel... again...
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Time travel... again...
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Time travel... again...
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time travel... again...
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Confusion over complex electromagnetic field
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Time travel... again...
  • From: Bob Dobbs
• Re: 106mpg Car!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The EM field of matter effects light EM force
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: 106mpg Car!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: PD
• Re: Physicist's Quantum-'Uncollapse' Hypothesis Verified
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: 106mpg Car!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Physicist's Quantum-'Uncollapse' Hypothesis Verified
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: 106mpg Car!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: 106mpg Car!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: 106mpg Car!
  • From: jimp
• Re: 106mpg Car!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: 106mpg Car!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: 106mpg Car!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 106mpg Car!
  • From: jimp
• Re: 106mpg Car!
  • From: kronecker
• Sex Offender Mark R. Thorson
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: Spaceman
• Sex Offender Mark R. Thorson
  • From: George Orwell
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: PD
• Re: Physicist's Quantum-'Uncollapse' Hypothesis Verified
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: PD
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: PD
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: 30-SECOND PHYSICS PROOF OF GOD
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: PD
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: 106mpg Car!
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: energy of sun that reaches earth
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: PD
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: hanson
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: Yuancur
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: PD
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Cloud electron vs Shell chemical bond
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: 106mpg Car!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: 30-SECOND PHYSICS PROOF OF GOD
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: PD
• Re: Confusion over complex electromagnetic field
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: energy of sun that reaches earth
  • From: tadchem
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Aug 11, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• energy of sun that reaches earth
  • From: viki
• Re: Inferior mathematics and science (Part II)
  • From: Bio Freak
• Re: Quantum Gravity 284.998: Italians Find Repulsive Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 284.998: Italians Find Repulsive Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 284.997: Russians via Dirac Discover One-Dimensional Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Physicist's Quantum-'Uncollapse' Hypothesis Verified
  • From: Sam Wormley
• 106mpg Car!
  • From: kronecker
• Re: What is a periodic crystal lattice?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Confusion over complex electromagnetic field
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Confusion over complex electromagnetic field
  • From: Darwin123
• Physicist's Quantum-'Uncollapse' Hypothesis Verified
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: What is a periodic crystal lattice?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The first point of the universe
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: Traveler
• What is a periodic crystal lattice?
  • From: DarkMatter
• Re: can it be levitation ?
  • From: john
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Confusion over complex electromagnetic field
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: why time is strange ?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Confusion over complex electromagnetic field
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: jimp
• Re: why time is strange ?
  • From: Mitch Raemsch
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: UNIVERSE MECHANICS
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: why time is strange ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: can it be levitation ?
  • From: love hiest
• Re: why time is strange ?
  • From: love hiest
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light is spread out energy
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Free New automatic matching activity builder
  • From: lorlarz
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: hanson
• Re: Non-Stationary Data & Fourier Transform
  • From: marky_sparky
• Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: Nie
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Quantum Gravity 284.996: Relationship of 284.995 (mistyped 294.995) and 2T and STM and Higgs Theories
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Non-Stationary Data & Fourier Transform
  • From: Thomas
• Re: Can there be life on Sun?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Non-Stationary Data & Fourier Transform
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Need some clarification on "work" please.
  • From: jim
• Quantum Gravity 294.995: from 294.994, In Early Universe T^3 was More Important, in Late Universe T^2 is More Important
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 284.994: Does Mass = Time o Length (Jacobson Radical Circle Composition Product) and Could G Be Dimensionless?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
  • From: Vince Morgan
• Re: Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
  • From: Vince Morgan
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Q on Dark Energy
  • From: Mitch Raemsch
• Re: Q on Dark Energy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Confusion over complex electromagnetic field
  • From: Edward Green
• Q on Dark Energy
  • From: McSwell
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Non-Stationary Data & Fourier Transform
  • From: marky_sparky
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Website space for sale at a very cheap rate
  • From: kronecker
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 8Aug 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Neuromancer
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Strich 9
• Oscillation distance vs total motion distance
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Hollywood NetBook™ Retail Integration: Motion Picture
  • From: rogerkolsson@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Inferior mathematics and science (Part II)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The DArk MAtter project, 10 years after
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The Ultimate formula
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 8Aug 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Raghar
• Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 8 Aug 08 Washington, DC
  • From: jimp
• Re: The DArk MAtter project, 10 years after
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Free MP3 downloads for Obama supporters
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Free MP3 downloads for Obama supporters
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Tom Potter
• Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
  • From: Nie
• Re: How Relativists Waste a Shitload of Other People's Money on Nothing
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: PD
• Why only Martians' Haversian canals need to be verified by lab instruments?
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 8 Aug 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: A second bronchus is found under Phoenix.
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Website space for sale at a very cheap rate
  • From: Atezaz . Ahmed
• The DArk MAtter project, 10 years after
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Szapudi’s team sees Sachs–Wolfe effect in CMB photons, signaling the presence of dark energy
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Traveler
• Inferior mathematics and science (Part II)
  • From: Mehran Basti
• A second bronchus is found under Phoenix.
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 284.993: P ' (t-->ty) = P ' ( (t o y) --> y)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: mike3
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: mike3
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 8 Aug 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 8 Aug 08 Washington, DC
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Why Octonions 1: Introduction
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why Octonions 8: Concluding Remarks
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: Mitch Raemsch
• Why Octonions 8: Concluding Remarks
  • From: Rick
• Why Octonions 6: Octonion Work-Force and Conservation Equations
  • From: Rick
• Why Octonions 4: The Octonion Ensemble Derivative
  • From: Rick
• Why Octonions 3: Octonion Algebraic Variance and Invariance
  • From: Rick
• Why Octonions 2: A Full Description of the Algebra
  • From: Rick
• Why Octonions 1: Introduction
  • From: Rick
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Physics Is A Game Played According To Certain Simple Rules
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Light is spread out energy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light is spread out energy
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: "Causality"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Traveler
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Igor
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 8 Aug 08 Washington, DC
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Androcles
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Igor
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Traveler
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Spaceman
• Quantum Gravity 284.992: Translation Into Probable Causation/Influence (PI) For 284.991
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: PD
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Androcles
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 8 Aug 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 284.991: Interpretation of Riccati dy/dt = (1/t)A + By + tCy^2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Confusion over complex electromagnetic field
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Traveler
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Need some clarification on "work" please.
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: PD
• Re: Free MP3 downloads for Obama supporters
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• A lot of Solution Manuals
  • From: sendsolutions
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: "Causality"
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Electromagnetic Signals Influencing Human Thought?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: SR Makes Contradictory Claims
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Non-Stationary Data & Fourier Transform
  • From: Thomas
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• "Causality"
  • From: Nie
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: More on the run-away greenhouse
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: More on the run-away greenhouse
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• what do you mean: electron is stable negatively charged particle?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Quantum Gravity 284.99: Notice that 298.98 has terms in 1/t, B - 1/t = (Bt - 1)/t, and t
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Lets VOTE Einstine Theory.
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Relativity, The Einstein Hoax and Disc Aircraft
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Quantum Gravity 284.99: Notice that 298.98 has terms in 1/t, B - 1/t = (Bt - 1)/t, and t
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Quantum Gravity 284.98: The Riccati Differential Equation dy/dt = (A/(tyo)) + (At - 1)y/t + By(0)ty^2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Energy as Immutable Substance
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: Spaceman
• hysicsworld.com newswire (Week 32)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Perchlorate vs. nitrate (was Re: Finding of perchlorates on Mars
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Light is spread out energy
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Free $100 In Gas at Your Favorite Station
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: Light is spread out energy
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Science Fiction: Global Warming and Physics
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• I think I made my point
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 268)
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Physics Is A Game Played According To Certain Simple Rules
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 268)
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Relativity, The Einstein Hoax and Disc Aircraft
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Relativity, The Einstein Hoax and Disc Aircraft
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Non-Stationary Data & Fourier Transform
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Igor
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 268)
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Lets VOTE Einstine Theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Need some clarification on "work" please.
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Sex Offender Mark R. Thorson
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Lets VOTE Einstine Theory.
  • From: hanson
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Need some clarification on "work" please.
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 268)
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: fuel consumption differences -- same speed
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Confusion over complex electromagnetic field
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Matter Shell; John Wheeler Geometry
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Electromagnetic Signals Influencing Human Thought?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Who are those idiots who post here?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Small Theory in Quantum Field- Liquid Nuclear Methodology
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Confusion over complex electromagnetic field
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: PD
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: PD
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Traveler
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Traveler
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Small Theory in Quantum Field- Liquid Nuclear Methodology
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The constancy of the velocity of light
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: #14 all stores, especially WalMart should switch to a
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: EXPERIMENTAL ARGUMENTS AGAINST SPECIAL RELATIVITY?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: More on the run-away greenhouse
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Non-Stationary Data & Fourier Transform
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: #24 Archimedes Plutonium's Fusion Energy Challenge; new book: Fusion
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Comparison of CAM3 predictions to AIRS (NASA Aqua satellite) observations
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Non-Stationary Data & Fourier Transform
  • From: marky_sparky
• Re: Electromagnetic Signals Influencing Human Thought?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: How Relativists Waste a Shitload of Other People's Money on Nothing
  • From: hanson
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: Spaceman
• Measuring Cloud Ice Helps in Global Warming Predictions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Confusion over complex electromagnetic field
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Who are those idiots who post here?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Quantum Gravity 284.97: A New Volterra-Like Convolution
  • From: mauimary
• Re: Confusion over complex electromagnetic field
  • From: Edward Green
• solutions manual
  • From: sendsolutions
• Re: Non-Stationary Data & Fourier Transform
  • From: Thomas
• Re: Equation for Tesla's Spheric Shield
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Confusion over complex electromagnetic field
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Lets VOTE Einstine Theory.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Need some clarification on "work" please.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Lets VOTE Einstine Theory.
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: How Relativists Waste a Shitload of Other People's Money on Nothing
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: How Relativists Waste a Shitload of Other People's Money on Nothing
  • From: hanson
• Re: More on the run-away greenhouse
  • From: hanson
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Non-Stationary Data & Fourier Transform
  • From: marky_sparky
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Non-Stationary Data & Fourier Transform
  • From: marky_sparky
• Re: Need some clarification on "work" please.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: fuel consumption differences -- same speed
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The constancy of the velocity of light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: PD
• Re: Need some clarification on "work" please.
  • From: PD
• Re: LARRY KING, YOU'VE DIPPED TO A NEW LOW
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: PD
• Re: Who are those idiots who post here?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Nie
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: PD
• Re: Need some clarification on "work" please.
  • From: jim
• Re: What happens when you force opposing magnetic fields together?
  • From: PD
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: PD
• STRICH invention: DAVID inertial motion detector
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: Androcles
• Need some clarification on "work" please.
  • From: jim
• Re: What happens when you force opposing magnetic fields together?
  • From: jim
• Who are those idiots who post here?
  • From: kronecker
• Re: Quantum Gravity 284.97: A New Volterra-Like Convolution
  • From: kronecker
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Free MP3 downloads for Obama supporters
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Can there be life on Sun?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: How Relativists Waste a Shitload of Other People's Money on Nothing
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Cancel Ares - No one seems to understand stability theory
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Quantum Gravity 284.97: A New Volterra-Like Convolution
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: jim
• Free MP3 downloads for Obama supporters
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: What happens when you force opposing magnetic fields together?
  • From: jim
• Re: Physics Is A Game Played According To Certain Simple Rules
  • From: Nostril Rodriquez
• Re: What happens when you force opposing magnetic fields together?
  • From: jonas . thornvall
• Re: Sharing data with Little Green Men
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How Relativists Waste a Shitload of Other People's Money on Nothing
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: More on the run-away greenhouse
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Internal Rocket Effect
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Traveler
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Heavy ice around the Svalbard archipelago surprises scientists
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: The measurement of the absolute speed of the earth through space
  • From: Peter Riedt
• The speed of light is c or c+v or c-v depending on the motion of the target
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• U.S. Climate Change Science Program, Synthesis and Assessment Product 3.1
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Science Fiction: Global Warming and Physics
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Confusion over complex electromagnetic field
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Nothing Can Move in Spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Confusion over complex electromagnetic field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: How Relativists Waste a Shitload of Other People's Money on
  • From: Traveler
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: kronecker
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: kronecker
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: kronecker
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How Relativists Waste a Shitload of Other People's Money on
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: What happens when you force opposing magnetic fields together?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Science Fiction: Global Warming and Physics
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: tadchem
• Re: What happens when you force opposing magnetic fields together?
  • From: jim
• Re: What happens when you force opposing magnetic fields together?
  • From: jim
• Confusion over complex electromagnetic field
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: jim
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: PD
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: jim
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: PD
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Igor
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What happens when you force opposing magnetic fields together?
  • From: PD
• Re: The Forces of Einstein
  • From: Igor
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: PD
• Re: The Forces of Einstein
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Forces of Einstein
  • From: Igor
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Igor
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Sue...
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Igor
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Relative illusion
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Matter Shell; John Wheeler Geometry
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: PD
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Sue...
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Exterior algebras, wedge products, and all that...
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: GHooper
• Re: How Relativists Waste a Shitload of Other People's Money on Nothing
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Energy as Immutable Substance
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Finding of perchlorates on Mars may provide a "life" explanation of the Viking results.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The Forces of Einstein
  • From: PD
• Re: The Forces of Einstein
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Matter Shell; John Wheeler Geometry
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Can there be life on Sun?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Earth's Radiation Energy Balance
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Leverian Trigonometric Dynamics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: What happens when you force opposing magnetic fields together?
  • From: Uncle Al
• newtons law and gun recoil
  • From: s
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: fuel consumption differences -- same speed
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Heavy ice around the Svalbard archipelago surprises scientists
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What happens when you force opposing magnetic fields together?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: More on the run-away greenhouse
  • From: hanson
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The Earth's Radiation Energy Balance
  • From: BURT
• The Earth's Radiation Energy Balance
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: The Forces of Einstein
  • From: BURT
• Re: Non-Stationary Data & Fourier Transform
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: An infinite number of any small thing will produce our universe.
  • From: BURT
• Re: The Forces of Einstein
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Non-Stationary Data & Fourier Transform
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: An infinite number of any small thing will produce our universe.
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Non-Stationary Data & Fourier Transform
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Forces of Einstein
  • From: BURT
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Someone please MASH IN Mark Thorson's face!
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: The Forces of Einstein
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Forces of Einstein
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Mitch Raemsch
• Re: More on the run-away greenhouse
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Forces of Einstein
  • From: Mitch Raemsch
• STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: An infinite number of any small thing will produce our universe.
  • From: Mitch Raemsch
• Re: What time is it on Mars?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: An infinite number of any small thing will produce our universe.
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What time is it on Mars?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The Forces of Einstein
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What time is it on Mars?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: THE PROBABILITY OF HELL
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The Forces of Einstein
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The Forces of Einstein
  • From: Mitch Raemsch
• Re: LARRY KING, YOU'VE DIPPED TO A NEW LOW
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: PD
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: hanson
• Re: What time is it on Mars?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: PD
• Re: Non-Stationary Data & Fourier Transform
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Some propellantless propulsion fun
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: PD
• Re: Heavy ice around the Svalbard archipelago surprises scientists
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Some propellantless propulsion fun
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Can there be life on Sun?
  • From: Sanny
• Re: The Forces of Einstein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tell me about warp device?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Forces of Einstein
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Tell me about warp device?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Exterior algebras, wedge products, and all that...
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Tell me about warp device?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can there be life on Sun?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Tell me about warp device?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Some propellantless propulsion fun
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Non-Stationary Data & Fourier Transform
  • From: marky_sparky
• Re: LARRY KING, YOU'VE DIPPED TO A NEW LOW
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• The Forces of Einstein
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Some propellantless propulsion fun
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Tell me about warp device?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Tell me about warp device?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Some propellantless propulsion fun
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: How Relativists Waste a Shitload of Other People's Money on Nothing
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Some propellantless propulsion fun
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: hanson
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Tell me about warp device?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Science Fiction: Global Warming and Physics
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: fuel consumption differences -- same speed
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Nie
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: PD
• Re: Tell me about warp device?
  • From: Lucien
• Re: What happens when you force opposing magnetic fields together?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: What happens when you force opposing magnetic fields together?
  • From: christofire
• What happens when you force opposing magnetic fields together?
  • From: jim
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: jim
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Some propellantless propulsion fun
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: Sanny
• fuel consumption differences -- same speed
  • From: viki
• Re: Diadein
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: a simple way to improve powerplants
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Aliens
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• FTL Travel is Useless even if it existed?
  • From: mike3
• Quantum Gravity 284.96: Directly Obtaining Convolution Integrals From Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Heavy ice around the Svalbard archipelago surprises scientists
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Tell me about warp device?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Man and dinosaur walked together on dead meat.
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: Mike Jr.
• The brainwash effect of velocity addition.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: More on the run-away greenhouse
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Buzzwords, Pseudoscience and Relativity
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Someone please MASH IN Mark Thorson's face!
  • From: George Orwell
• Re: Tell me about warp device?
  • From: Lucien
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Traveler
• Re: E=MC^2
  • From: Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 284.95: Solution of I[y(t)y(x-t)]dt = (Ax+B)exp(kx), A, B > 0
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Einstein Cult Index
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The Einstein Cult Index
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Science Fiction: Global Warming and Physics
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Traveler
• Re: LARRY KING, YOU'VE DIPPED TO A NEW LOW
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Science Fiction: Global Warming and Physics
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Tell me about warp device?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The constancy of the velocity of light
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: Igor
• Re: Circular Relativist Explanation for Orbit Decay
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Science Fiction: Global Warming and Physics
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Evidence of So-called Gravitational Lensing Fallacious
  • From: PD
• Re: Science Fiction: Global Warming and Physics
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Evidence of So-called Gravitational Lensing Fallacious
  • From: OG
• Re: Science Fiction: Global Warming and Physics
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Aliens
  • From: jimp
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Aliens
  • From: John Park
• Re: Aliens
  • From: jimp
• Re: Aliens
  • From: Cwatters
• El "Sindicato" contra la "OEQDSD"
  • From: Xaustein
• Re: "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Universe"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Uncle Al
• "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Universe"
  • From: Nie
• Re: Are there forces in relativity?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Evidence of So-called Gravitational Lensing Fallacious
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: <<Today the electron's mass in kg is only the Moment of its
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Weight
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The constancy of the velocity of light
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: More on the run-away greenhouse
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: <<Today the electron's mass in kg is only the Moment of its Force. Demonstration of the space-time bond of the actual Moment>>, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: Romano Amodeo
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: PD
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Aliens
  • From: jimp
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: PD
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Igor
• Re: More on the run-away greenhouse
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: hanson
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Tell me about warp device?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: big bang is an oscillatory system
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Aliens
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The constancy of the velocity of light
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: C is Unity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: THE PROBABILITY OF HELL
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Clueless BASTARD Mark Robert Thorson
  • From: George Orwell
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The constancy of the velocity of light
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: PD
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: PD
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: PD
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: mauimary
• Re: Tell me about warp device?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: PD
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: PD
• Re: The constancy of the velocity of light
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: hanson
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The constancy of the velocity of light
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: THE PROBABILITY OF HELL
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Science Fiction: Global Warming and Physics
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Phoenix Contaminated Mars
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Weight
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: More on the run-away greenhouse
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Aliens
  • From: PD
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: PD
• Re: Buzzwords, Pseudoscience and Relativity
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Relativity and Lorentz transformations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity and Lorentz transformations
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: Louis_N
• Re: Relativity and Lorentz transformations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Relativity and Lorentz transformations
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Sharing data with Little Green Men
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Relativity and Lorentz transformations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: OG
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: OG
• Quantum Gravity 294.94: Japan Throws Out Wave Function and Reconstructs QM With Information Operators
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Relativity and Lorentz transformations
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Surely Martian Haversian canals in king's new clothes.
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: The constancy of the velocity of light
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The constancy of the velocity of light
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Aliens
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: How Relativists Waste a Shitload of Other People's Money on
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Aliens
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Aliens
  • From: falderals
• Sex Predator Mark Robert Thorson
  • From: Joe Fretzel
• Re: Sharing data with Little Green Men
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How Do Genius Work? How To Make Genius Work?
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 284.93: Solving I[(x - t)y(t)]dt = f(x), f(x) known
  • From: OsherD
• We may never know for sure what the first stars...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 284.92: Austria, U.K., Others Relate Convolution To Memory and Quantum Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Weight
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Weight
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Weight
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Mitch Raemsch
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: OG
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: CONTINUUM, DISCONTINUUM, EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Science Fiction: Global Warming and Physics
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Igor
• Re: How Do Genius Work? How To Make Genius Work?
  • From: GigaS
• Re: Science Fiction: Global Warming and Physics
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: KPa for 1atm
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: KPa for 1atm
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The constancy of the velocity of light
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Science Fiction: Global Warming and Physics
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Dark Age of Cosmology
  • From: Strich 9
• About the Exploration of the Electron
  • From: Louis_N
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Basic Nuclear Security Disclosure-faq- Liquid Theory Lives, Students
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is This a Subtle but Completely Legitimate Redefinition,
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: In The Round
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Science Fiction: Global Warming and Physics
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The constancy of the velocity of light
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Science Fiction: Global Warming and Physics
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Buzzwords, Pseudoscience and Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: jim
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The measurement of the absolute speed of the earth through space
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The measurement of the absolute speed of the earth through space
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The measurement of the absolute speed of the earth through space
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Buzzwords, Pseudoscience and Relativity
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The constancy of the velocity of light
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: jim
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Duck pond physics for Aether Dingleberries
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Duck pond physics for Aether Dingleberries
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Wow, watching Obama is becoming sport...
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Wow, watching Obama is becoming sport...
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: KPa for 1atm
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Duck pond physics for Aether Dingleberries
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Duck pond physics for Aether Dingleberries
  • From: Spaceman
• Regarding Ayurveda and Ancient Healing.
  • From: R.Mukundha Krishnan Ji - Spiritual Mystic Healer
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: What is a worm hole in theory?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Sharing data with Little Green Men
  • From: Ian Parker
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Aug 04, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is a worm hole in theory?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Duck pond physics for Aether Dingleberries
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: jim
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: jim
• Re: The measurement of the absolute speed of the earth through space
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Quantum Gravity 284.91: Italians Find Radiation-Like Era Before Inflation Relating to Fundamental Set
  • From: OsherD
• Re: KPa for 1atm
  • From: mike3
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ - Gisse Fiddles
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is a worm hole in theory?
  • From: mike3
• Re: The measurement of the absolute speed of the earth through space
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ - Gisse Fiddles
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: What is a worm hole in theory?
  • From: festusbyrne
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ - Gisse Fiddles
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ - Gisse Fiddles
  • From: Sue...
• Quantum Gravity 284.9: Converting Deterministic to Random System in Inverse Diffraction
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Lipkin'sclassic "Lie Groups for Pedestrians
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Quantum Gravity 284.8: Convolution in Inverse Diffraction Theory from U.K. and Germany
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The measurement of the absolute speed of the earth through space
  • From: Pencil-neck of Perdition
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Wow, watching Obama is becoming sport...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Sharing data with Little Green Men
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Mechanical Resonance Question
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ - Gisse Fiddles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: KPa for 1atm
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: jim
• Re: Wow, watching Obama is becoming sport...
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Need help finding magnets for experiment...
  • From: jim
• Re: Wow, watching Obama is becoming sport...
  • From: jimp
• Re: KPa for 1atm
  • From: dan
• solutions manual
  • From: sendsolutions
• Re: Waves for Einstein Dingleberries
  • From: hanson
• Re: Wow, watching Obama is becoming sport...
  • From: hanson
• Re: KPa for 1atm
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: Waves for Einstein Dingleberries
  • From: jack
• KPa for 1atm
  • From: dan
• Re: Waves for Einstein Dingleberries
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is a worm hole in theory?
  • From: Igor
• Re: What is a worm hole in theory?
  • From: Igor
• Re: What is a worm hole in theory?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Wow, watching Obama is becoming sport...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Waves for Einstein Dingleberries
  • From: hanson
• Re: Wow, watching Obama is becoming sport...
  • From: hanson
• Re: Mechanical Resonance Question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Quantum Gravity 284.6: Convolution in Physics
  • From: jack
• Re: Riemanian geometry and the 4th spatial dimension
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Waves for Einstein Dingleberries
  • From: jack
• Solutions Manual Vector Mechanics for Engineers DYNAMICS, 8th Edition by F. P. Beer,
  • From: paysolution
• Quantum Gravity 284.7: A Riccati Quantum Gravity Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Waves for Einstein Dingleberries
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Waves for Einstein Dingleberries
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Waves for Einstein Dingleberries
  • From: hanson
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: "White House Briefed On Potential For Mars Life" - something beyond the water results.
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: Benj
• Re: "White House Briefed On Potential For Mars Life" - something beyond the water results.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Mechanical Resonance Question
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ - Gisse Fiddles
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mechanical Resonance Question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Mechanical Resonance Question
  • From: Edward Green
• New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ - Gisse Fiddles
  • From: Strich 9
• Lipkin'sclassic "Lie Groups for Pedestrians
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Wow, watching Obama is becoming sport...
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Sharing data with Little Green Men
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Sharing data with Little Green Men
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Sharing data with Little Green Men
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Sharing data with Little Green Men
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Talebun
• Re: http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2008/801/3
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: What is a worm hole in theory?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What is a worm hole in theory?
  • From: festusbyrne
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: How Relativists Waste a Shitload of Other People's Money on
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Quantum Gravity 284.6: Convolution in Physics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Mechanical Resonance Question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Diadein
  • From: Paul Stelzner
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Mechanical Resonance Question
  • From: Igor
• Re: another gravity theory
  • From: Igor
• Re: What is a worm hole in theory?
  • From: Igor
• Re: In The Round
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What is a worm hole in theory?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: What is a worm hole in theory?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Bert Hickman
• http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2008/801/3
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is a worm hole in theory?
  • From: Spaceman
• What is a worm hole in theory?
  • From: festusbyrne
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Plonkaty Plonk
• Re: Wow, watching Obama is becoming sport...
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: My New Internet Post- Nuclear Liquid Theory Host
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Mechanical Resonance Question
  • From: PD
• My New Internet Post- Nuclear Liquid Theory Host
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Mechanical Resonance Question
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Generate coherent photons from incoherent plasmons?
  • From: cyber one
• Re: Generate coherent photons from incoherent plasmons?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mechanical Resonance Question
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Generate coherent photons from incoherent plasmons?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Wow, watching Obama is becoming sport...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Generate coherent photons from incoherent plasmons?
  • From: cyber one
• Re: another gravity theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Generate coherent photons from incoherent plasmons?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Problem of Increasing Human Energy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Dragons of God, Arise
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Generate coherent photons from incoherent plasmons?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wow, watching Obama is becoming sport...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Wow, watching Obama is becoming sport...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Generate coherent photons from incoherent plasmons?
  • From: cyber one
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 1 August 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: faster than the speed of light communication
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: GR predicts precession incorrectly
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Space expansion and contraction
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: GR predicts precession incorrectly
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: another gravity theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: another gravity theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wow, watching Obama is becoming sport...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sharing data with Little Green Men
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Wow, watching Obama is becoming sport...
  • From: Benj
• Re: Man and dinosaur walked together on dead meat.
  • From: Benj
• Re: doubt
  • From: PD
• Re: doubt
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Quantum Gravity 284.5: Convolution Has Over 1000 Papers in arXiv Including Subcategories
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Wow, watching Obama is becoming sport...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mechanical Resonance Question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Man and dinosaur walked together on dead meat.
  • From: jimp
• Re: Mechanical Resonance Question
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Wow, watching Obama is becoming sport...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR predicts precession incorrectly
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Sharing data with Little Green Men
  • From: PD
• Re: Dragons of God, Arise
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Dragons of God, Arise
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The Problem of Increasing Human Energy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: <<Today the electron's mass in kg is only the Moment of its Force. Demonstration of the space-time bond of the actual Moment>>, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: tadchem
• Re: doubt
  • From: hwabnig
• Re: doubt
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Sharing data with Little Green Men
  • From: Ian Parker
• "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Fos
• Re: THE PROBABILITY OF HELL
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Man and dinosaur walked together on dead meat.
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Sharing data with Little Green Men
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Why no (new) drilling in the US?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Man and dinosaur walked together on dead meat.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Mechanical Resonance Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Man and dinosaur walked together on dead meat.
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Mechanical Resonance Question
  • From: Robert11
• Re: Quantum Gravity 284.4: (Auto-)-Convolution Relates to Star Product
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 284.4: (Auto-)-Convolution Relates to Star Product
  • From: OsherD
• another gravity theory
  • From: jedakiah
• Re: Sharing data with Little Green Men
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Why is Bush trying to derail McCain?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Sharing data with Little Green Men
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Gravitational time dilation within shell
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: <<Today the electron's mass in kg is only the Moment of its
  • From: Romano Amodeo
• Quantum Gravity 284.3: (f o f) Relates to Convolution Inequalities Via Canada and CUNY
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Gravitational time dilation within shell
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Quantum Gravity 248.3: A 5-Dimensional Riccati Differential Equation With a Generalized Star Product
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• doubt
  • From: iitaspirant2009
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: <<Today the electron's mass in kg is only the Moment of its Force. Demonstration of the space-time bond of the actual Moment>>, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: norton
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: KEITH OLBERMANN, YOU BLEW IT!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 1 August 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Common Batteries'reaction
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: rbwinn
• Re: faster than the speed of light communication
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Gravitational time dilation within shell
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR predicts precession incorrectly
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: faster than the speed of light communication
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: faster than the speed of light communication
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gravitational time dilation within shell
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Man and dinosaur walked together on dead meat.
  • From: jimp
• Re: Gravitational time dilation within shell
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Space expansion and contraction
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Man and dinosaur walked together on dead meat.
  • From: john
• Re: Space expansion and contraction
  • From: nkomli
• Re: Man and dinosaur walked together on dead meat.
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gravitational time dilation within shell
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: faster than the speed of light communication
  • From: Sue...
• Re: faster than the speed of light communication
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GR predicts precession incorrectly
  • From: Igor
• Re: Space expansion and contraction
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Space expansion and contraction
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: faster than the speed of light communication
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Space expansion and contraction
  • From: nkomli
• Re: faster than the speed of light communication
  • From: Androcles
• Re: faster than the speed of light communication
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How Do Genius Work? How To Make Genius Work?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday,
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: GR predicts precession incorrectly
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Man and dinosaur walked together on dead meat.
  • From: tadchem
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 1 Aug 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: news://netnews.mchsi.com:119/sci.physics
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Space expansion and contraction
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Space expansion and contraction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Space expansion and contraction
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Space expansion and contraction
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: The Einstein Cult Index
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: The Einstein Cult Index
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: The Einstein Cult Index
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: <<Today the electron's mass in kg is only the Moment of its
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Space expansion and contraction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravitational time dilation within shell
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Space expansion and contraction
  • From: Spaceman
• Space expansion and contraction
  • From: nkomli
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How Do Genius Work? How To Make Genius Work?
  • From: GigaS
• Re: <<Today the electron's mass in kg is only the Moment of its
  • From: Romano Amodeo
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Cwatters
• faster than the speed of light communication
  • From: jedakiah
• Re: GR predicts precession incorrectly
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: GR predicts precession incorrectly
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: News Flash: Gen Y finally hits Technical Schools!
  • From: Mr. Furious
• Re: Common Batteries'reaction
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• GR predicts precession incorrectly
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: gravity theory
  • From: jedakiah
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Man and dinosaur walked together on dead meat.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: <<Today the electron's mass in kg is only the Moment of its
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Whatever happened to electromechanical batteries as power sources?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Common Batteries'reaction
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: news://netnews.mchsi.com:119/sci.physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: <<Today the electron's mass in kg is only the Moment of its Force. Demonstration of the space-time bond of the actual Moment>>, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: Romano Amodeo
• Re: Bremsstrahlung and sparks
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: <<Today the electron's mass in kg is only the Moment of its Force. Demonstration of the space-time bond of the actual Moment>>, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: spring
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: Edward Green
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Fos
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Britain goes backwards
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: PD
• Re: Dragkoefficient C_D
  • From: Cwatters
• News Flash: Gen Y finally hits Technical Schools!
  • From: Benj
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Negative Time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Whatever happened to electromechanical batteries as power sources?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Whatever happened to electromechanical batteries as power sources?
  • From: Ian Parker
• <<Today the electron's mass in kg is only the Moment of its Force. Demonstration of the space-time bond of the actual Moment>>, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: Romano Amodeo
• Re: Whatever happened to electromechanical batteries as power sources?
  • From: Vince Morgan
• Video: MIT develops solar storage "nirvana": energy crisis solved?
  • From: Bluuuuue Rajah
• Re: Whatever happened to electromechanical batteries as power sources?
  • From: jim
• Whatever happened to electromechanical batteries as power sources?
  • From: jim
• Re: Androcles' Honor List of Einstein Dingleberries
  • From: hwabnig
• Re: Burn yer Bible
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Why is Bush trying to derail McCain?
  • From: hanson
• Quantum Gravity 248.2: Completely Entangled Objects Are Identical With Probability 1
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why is Bush trying to derail McCain?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON?
  • From: Mitch Raemsch
• Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Simulation points to lightweight first stars ???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Common Batteries'reaction
  • From: sunnye
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: ZLOPPS Zero loss of propellant propulsion system
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity Monkey Screening Exam
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Negative Time
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Does God need to prove He exists?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: news://netnews.mchsi.com:119/sci.physics
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Is angular velocity a vector?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Bremsstrahlung and sparks
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Negative Time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Androcles' Honor List of Einstein Dingleberries
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a simple way to improve powerplants
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Bremsstrahlung and sparks
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: Bremsstrahlung and sparks
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Bremsstrahlung and sparks
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Relativity Monkey Screening Exam
  • From: Igor
• Androcles' Honor List of Einstein Dingleberries
  • From: hanson
• Re: a simple way to improve powerplants
  • From: mrdarrett
• news://netnews.mchsi.com:119/sci.physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: a simple way to improve powerplants
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Negative Time
  • From: kronecker
• Re: Negative Time
  • From: Igor
• NASA Confirms, it is WATER NOT CO2
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Entropic Red Shift
  • From: Mitch Raemsch
• Re: Entropic Red Shift
  • From: Igor
• Bremsstrahlung and sparks
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: a simple way to improve powerplants
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: a simple way to improve powerplants
  • From: jimp
• Re: Negative Time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a simple way to improve powerplants
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Entropic Red Shift
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: a simple way to improve powerplants
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON?
  • From: PD
• Re: Cancel Ares - No one seems to understand stability theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Relativity Monkey Screening Exam
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Point particles and infinite energy density
  • From: Mitch Raemsch
• Re: Relativity Monkey Screening Exam
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Negative Time
  • From: BURT
• Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Negative Time
  • From: Uncle Al
• Negative Time
  • From: kronecker
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Relativity, The Einstein Hoax and Disc Aircraft
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Some thoughts on Roswell Part VI
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Entropic Red Shift
  • From: Strich 9
• a simple way to improve powerplants
  • From: jedakiah