My New Internet Post- Nuclear Liquid Theory Host

My New Internet Position- Nuclear Liquid Theory Host

By: Douglas Eagleson, 2008
eaglesondouglas@xxxxxxxxx

A statement is about to begin concerning the meaning of the issue. I
have resolved myself to be the representative of advanced liquid
theory here on the internet. I have little interest in statistical
mechanics as the nuclear security system literally invented the
science artificially.

It should take a sing message to a true theorist to worry them of the
impact of defective worldwide neutron standards. So I being my
introduction the introduction where a fission was as always an exact
number of neutron released.


U-235 + 1 N -à D1 + D2 + xN + energy released

“x” represents the exact nature to fission and the difficulty in
absolving the security system designers was to warn of the true impact
of liquid class theory as relates to nuclear weapons. A nonlinearity
occurs while a detonation is under examination by radiation detectors
placed on the weapons casing.

A second reaction occurs other than supercriticality. And the reaction
was always a double Uranium Fission. Implying that supercriticality of
Double-U interaction was the second reaction causing the massive
release to occur.

2U +1N -> D1 + D2 + U + xN +energy released.

Asymmetric fission destabilizes a system by close association of the
second Uranium atom to the fissioning atom. U-233 has a profound
probability of asymmetric interaction. A close examination of the
daughter/product yield curves for compressed U-233 shows a skewed
yield relative to the single U atom fission curve. A destabilized
U-233 double atom system occurs at very low compressions even
mechanical compression alters the skewedness.

Given the design above the number of neutron to initiate double
Uranium fission is predicted. A single Neutron. A multiplicative
supercriticality was as always the issue. How does one predict this
occurance? And the degree of U enrichments was the issue while
geometric size was found of little effect.

A core size probability of interaction initiates a critical event.
And continued interaction demands a slight theory of size to allow all
interaction to proceed in a supercritical event method. At a certain
size/mass of core a continued multiplication of neutrons occurs. And
the idea was as always to allow the density of core U to dictate the
size.

Allowing for the effect of liquid interaction then indicates the
reasoning behind nuclear security existence. A core as a surface must
always leak less than the multiplication rate. It is that simple as a
method of criticality control. Leakage to multiplication rates control
the k of the system. What is commonly misunderstood was the rate of
the Double Atom reaction relative to the single U atom reaction. High
skewedness causes a massive change in the neutron output of the
interaction.

Thus allowing small critical mass sizes for this interaction to
supercritically expand.

So the basic idea was to follow the nuclear security design to
disallow such advanced concepts in theory of weapons. We live in an
advancing age of coming fusion and the coming method of space
travels. So maturity of science was to occur and I was elected by
self appointment the representative of the nuclear security system.

My nuclear design was of such a low enrichment direct two-alpha
initiation. Subcritical mass thermonuclear detonators are truly
possible. Grow up.

So I devised a theory to allow advanced accelerator design and placed
a super compact Deuterium-Tritium Linac on the head of the 2-
dimensionally compressed core and wait for the evaluation to return.

My design.

And to allow scientists to interact with an expert in liquid theory is
my intention.

I am elected by default the only physicist practicing here on the
internet. One sentence can fail a whole science and how many times
have I warned.
.

Relevant Pages