Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ - Gisse Fiddles
- From: "Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 12:49:13 -0400
Strich 9 wrote:
Eric Gisse;1201768 Wrote:
...Every modern treatment of relativity and various flavors of
quantum theory I have seen all treat mass as an invariant, which
makes me wonder what his point is...
[...]
Mass, length, time, these are all invariant. So-called relativisitic
mass has come in conflict with quantum dynamics and now it is being
reinterpreted as invariant in -modern- relativity. In -time-,
relativity will come to grips with an invariant length and time, and a
neo-relativistic invariant length and time will evolve.
Interestingly, SR posited a so-called -space-time continuum- which was
flat, and GR, posited a so-called *-space-time-mass continuum -* which
was curved, curvature being due to the latter quantity. These popular
concepts will be looked at with amusement by future generations of
intellects.
It is already being laughed at today by anyone that understands
that 0.6c + 0.6c = 1.2c
and not one bit of basic math can prove that wrong without proving
itself wrong also.
:)
It is pathetic how a flawed theory continues to be espoused by
pseudo-intellects who can find no employment except to dream up
fictional scenarios. Perhaps relativity physicists should apply to
Marvel comics, where their concepts may find more application.
Or the SciFi network.
:)
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Creator of the Clock Malfunction Theory
Spaceman
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Mechanical Resonance Question
- Next by Date: Re: Mechanical Resonance Question
- Previous by thread: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ - Gisse Fiddles
- Next by thread: Re: New version of"Does mass increase with speed?" FAQ - Gisse Fiddles
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
