Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.

On Aug 18, 5:42 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 16, 8:36 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:







Today, I ran a simple KE test.  I dropped a ¾” dia. chrome steel ball
from a height of 3.3684 feet into a small flower pot full of just-
mixed art clay.  That ball sank in close to its ‘equator’.  I
immediately went up my outdoor staircase and dropped a ¾” dia. PTFE (a
heavy fluoroplastic ball, weighing .2807 times as much as the chrome
steel ball), from an exact height of 12 feet.  The KE value should be .
10469323 for each ball.  Note: 12 feet of drop = .745944d, where d =
16.087 feet, the distance of fall in one second.  The time of fall is .
86368 seconds for the lighter ball.

The PTFE ball landed 1” from the chrome steel ball.  It sank into the
clay only about .75 as deep.  If Coriolis’s equation was correct, both
balls would be imbedded equally.  Those two balls are stuck in the
clay.  I will let everything air dry to serve to document my
experiment.

The above simple experiment can be run with any two equal size, but
different weight balls.  (Ping Pong balls excluded.)  Use Coriolis’s
equation to make the KE values for each ball weight equal.  If you
have access to a tall building where drops can be made from two
heights as required to satisfy the equations, the results, still,
won’t cause equal size holes in the clay.  A semi-parabolic equation,
like Coriolis’s, can never predict impact results when the Law of
Nature is a LINEAR increase in KE with respect to velocity!  My
correct equation is: KE = a/g (m) + v/32.174 (m).

Now, perhaps, you are getting a small dose of the critical review that
publishing experimental results will have to endure, NoEinstein. As
others here have pointed out, there are a number of things that you
document here that are obviously questionable. A published
experimental finding has to be polished and more carefully prepared so
that it will endure this kind of examination.

If you don't want to do that, then you have the wrong hobby.

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dear PD: You are more impressed by the shine on the print paper than
you are by new scientific truths. You should try chasing your own
tail. Evolution never caused yours to disappear. — NoEinstein —
.

Relevant Pages
Loading